TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

F5 BIG-IP vs. F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

F5

Connect with F5

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with F5 so that F5 and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    F5 BIG-IP

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AF5 BIG-IP software from Seattle-based F5 Networks is a load balancing and application protection solution suite available on cloud or via virtual editions, on a subscription or perpetual licensing basis.N/A

    F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AF5 Distributed Cloud WAF leverages F5's Advanced WAF technology, delivering WAF-as-a-Service and combining signature- and behavior-based protection for web applications. It acts as an intermediate proxy to inspect application requests and responses to block and mitigate a broad spectrum of risks stemming from the OW ASP Top 10, persistent and coordinated threat campaigns, bots, and layer 7 DoS.N/A
    Pricing
    F5 BIG-IPF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    F5 BIG-IPF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    F5 BIG-IPF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    Considered Both Products
    F5
    Chose F5 BIG-IP
    We are recently not evaluating, but we have started the deployment for WAF and we're using GTM, LTM, you name it. F5, we are using all of them.
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 BIG-IP
    Scale and timing
    Incentivized
    F5
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    A lot of companies already use the BIG-IP and this is the most seen combination.
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    We use bigIP primarily for on-premises infrastructure and protection against volumetric DDoS attacks, including F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall).

    El bigIP lo utilizamos más para infra on premise, proteccion de ataques volumetricos de DDoS que inculye F5 …
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    I prefer F5 Distributed Cloud over BIG-IP is due to we have multiple BIG-IPs, and login in to each one and administer them individually is time consuming. Versus maintaining visibility globally on just one dashboard. In addition, the WAAP services in Distributed Cloud is …
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    F5 continues to be the leader in our mind, offering the most robust and powerful WAF on the market that meets our needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    waf de azure, pero El waf de azure es mas para empresas pequenas,

    Azure WAF, but Azure WAF is more for small businesses
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    F5 provide the robustness and single console for multiple solution and management and functional is easy and more adoptable to use for day to day support and functions. where there are more option for threat and security prevention and enabling the customer to support the …
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    As per company standards
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    When comparing F5 Distributed Cloud WAF, Akamai, Cloudflare, and Fastly, Fastly generally stands out for its raw speed and focus on developer-friendly features, while Cloudflare is often considered the best balance of speed, security, and ease of use, making it a popular choice …
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    Our organization chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) because, in our opinion, F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) has Better WAF protection
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    Much simpler to enable and apply. No concerns of resource usage on hardware appliances
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    Big IP has been a great help in giving visibility to our tools and what ingress/egress traffic they have.
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    F5 Distributed Cloud WAF IS ALREADY ESTABLISHED WITH SOLUTIONS LIKE BIG IP SO IT IS EASIER FOR ANY VENDOR TO PUT THEIR TRUST ON F5 SOLUTIONS
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    LTM is the first layer for optimize and accelerate the service then the waf protect them
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    because the solution was well know by the team
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    Better filtering of urls.
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) Is what solve my security problems
    Incentivized
    Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    They are both really seamless and efficient.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    99%
    Would buy again
    258 Answers
    98%
    Would buy again
    178 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    215 Answers
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    158 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    255 Answers
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    174 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    179 Answers
    96%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    129 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    94%
    Implementation went as expected
    196 Answers
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    142 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    F5 BIG-IPF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    F5 BIG-IPF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (265 ratings)
    9.2
    (180 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    7.7
    (11 ratings)
    Usability
    8.7
    (140 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    8.7
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.7
    (12 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.2
    (3 ratings)
    8.6
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.3
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    8.3
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    F5 BIG-IPF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    F5
    LTM's scope of action goes beyond load balancing. Tools for control, governance, and application enhancement, as well as APIs like iRULE, are very important for day-to-day operations. Furthermore, the F5 BIG-IP WAF offers exceptional security. Advanced firewall and routing functionalities are helpful in more complex environments. O LTM possui um escopo de atuacao que vai alem do balanceamento. Ferramentas para controle, governanca e aprimoramento de aplicacoes e API como iRULE sao muito iportantes para o dia a dia a operacao. Alem disso o WAF do F5 BIG-IP tem uma qualidade de seguranca exceptional. As funcionalidades avancadas de firewall e roteamento ajudam em ambientes mais complexos. This review was originally written in Portuguese and has been translated into English using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    It is doing its job effectively, and its scalability is superb. So, if you have a mixed environment with cloud and on-premise systems to protect this product, provide a solution to the challenge. However, its management is more suited to DevOps teams rather than to the ones responsible for on-premise systems, making the management a bit more complex.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    F5
    • My company is kind of like it's a safe thing if you log in and you provide another second login to get the code to log in, confirm that it's a correct that you are logged into the account and it just provides more for the company
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    • Layer seven attacks are becoming far more common. Traditionally it was always layered three, layer four, where you get an additional firewall, but with the application layer attacks become more frequent, more popular, et cetera. So having the web application firewall protecting us, and then with the recent Log4j, that's the most recent use case when it gave us that instant level of protection whilst we remediated the Log4j that we had that and the F5 Distributed Cloud WAF was protecting us.
    • I have a great relationship with the account manager, my account manager, and I think he drives the best price possible, um, for me, and I'm happy with that price.
    • F5 Distributed Cloud WAF is always innovating and evolving.
    • We run a very competitive proof value where we run numerous competitors against each other, and then we evaluate from that and then make the selection, and F5 Distributed Cloud WAF was the winner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    F5
    • I think a couple of challenges. One, I mean the cost, it's not an inexpensive product, but I think it's probably parity with value, maybe a little on the pricey side of things.
    • As far as features and what we'd like to see more cloud native type experiences like where NGINX and F5 kind of come together, we're moving more of the cloud just like everybody else, and it's a little clunky right now.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    • Lack of warnings, currently the console does not provide a warning when deleting key-value entry.
    • The web GUI could use some tweaking, currently no undo option when removing exclusion rules.
    • Configuration complexity, currently menus and options are hidden, making it hard to configure vs on prem.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    F5
    Stability of product and easy way to have account manager contact. F5 support team is also always available to help with major issues. Last year during the major OS upgrade F5 team and F5 leadership always shared clear information and F5 team was dedicated to help us to have it closed in record time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    We gave it an 8 because it protects our web apps well and is reliable. The WAF is flexible and meets most of our needs. It could improve in user interface and make integrations easier, but overall, it’s a solid and effective security tool for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    F5
    It is a good product to use but right now it is lacking the automation of certificates, management of iRules and automation of certain configuration. Also creating an APM policy from scratch with many APM agents take a long time due to slow load times of the GUI and the need to create everything from scratch every time. It's tough to reuse the configuration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    I believe is a solution that was designed from the start to be simple and easy to use. Coming from Imperva, it simply eased the burden and complexity of managing and securing our apps on different environments (cloud and on-prem). It easy to scale and very quick to deploy (as a cloud waf should be), provide us with DevOps integrations, visibility and automatic insights from multiple events that guarantee peace of mind for us analysts and opp managers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    F5
    No answers on this topic
    F5
    Seems no issue
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    F5
    No answers on this topic
    F5
    Unnoticed slowness
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    F5
    I've supported F5 for three different companies. Our F5 support has been very consistent, regardless who the customer is. F5 technicians are very experienced and provide good support, even when issues are more related to knowledge than they are with the ability of the product to do what you need it to do.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    I never contacted support for this product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    F5
    Practical cases and hands on , many hours of training with tipical cases
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    F5
    No answers on this topic
    F5
    Online training saves me lots of time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    F5
    implementation is fine
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    Just make sure you origin servers have F5 IPs allowed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    F5
    We are recently not evaluating, but we have started the deployment for WAF and we're using GTM, LTM, you name it. F5, we are using all of them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    The other one that I've used in the past, they're very similar and I haven't used it recently, so I can't do a side-by-side comparison today. But I can say that F5 does everything we want it to do consistent with what this other product did do and it's got enhanced features and of course we have a long history with F5 as a product set in general.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    F5
    No answers on this topic
    F5
    Dont see any issue so far
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    F5
    • The F5 BIG-IP has improved all our load balancing needs, we have over 400 LTM VIPs in our environment this all use to be done with DNS round Robin configurations.
    • we have created unique APM solutions to support our external customer base
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    • The biggest gain for us was speed. Before F5 Distributed Cloud WAF, onboarding a new app to our WAF stack meant manual rule tuning, traffic sampling and regression testing. Right now, we spin up a service, tag it with the right policy and its ready (production ready) within hours
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshot