Factorial is a business management software designed to streamline HR processes, including time and attendance tracking, talent development, payroll, and finance management.
$80
per month
KeldairHR
Score7 out of 10
N/A
Hyrell is a cloud-based applicant tracking system. Its capabilities include batch or mass communication with potential candidates via multiple channels like email, social recruiting, and job boards, employee screening and testing, resume parsing, data management, and analytics.
$299
per month
Pricing
Factorial
KeldairHR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Up to 5 Open Jobs
$299
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 10 Open Jobs
$499
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 20 Open Jobs
$799
per month with an annual agreement
Up to 30 Open Jobs
$1049
per month with an annual agreement
More then 30 Open Jobs
Contact Company
per month with an annual agreement
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Factorial
KeldairHR
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Pay for the number of open positions you plan to have and you get unlimited users, all the core features, unlimited applicants, and unlimited storage.
More Pricing Information
Features
Factorial
KeldairHR
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Factorial and KeldairHR
Feature
Factorial
7.8
1 Ratings
5% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Factorial and KeldairHR
Feature
Factorial
7.7
1 Ratings
7% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Approval workflow
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Balance details
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Factorial and KeldairHR
Feature
Factorial
5.0
1 Ratings
49% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Update personal information
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
View company policy documentation
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
View job history
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Factorial and KeldairHR
Feature
Factorial
6.0
1 Ratings
29% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Factorial and KeldairHR
Feature
Factorial
5.3
1 Ratings
36% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Report builder
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pre-built reports
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Factorial and KeldairHR
Feature
Factorial
3.5
1 Ratings
79% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
New hire portal
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Factorial and KeldairHR
Feature
Factorial
2.8
1 Ratings
97% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Factorial and KeldairHR
Feature
Factorial
5.8
1 Ratings
32% below category average
KeldairHR
-
Ratings
Performance plans
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Factorial and KeldairHR
I am not fully convinced about factorial HR yet. We are about to transition to a new tool after using Recruitee for a long time. The bar was high when it came to recruitment ATS. and Factorial HR is multifaceted but not as well structured or functional. Support in other languages should also be improved, as those are the most common reviews I have seen online.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is great at getting applicants to apply. The one down side is that a majority of our applicants are applying from a mobile device so they are unable to complete the entire application process. When you send them a link to complete the rest of the application from a desktop computer, many do not have access to this. Because of this, they do not answer some of the "weed out" questions that give us insight as to what type of employee they would be.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Automatic position posting has increased our exposure drastically as an employer. We have increased our applicant flow by over 100%.
Hyrell's applicant communication features have allowed us to stay engaged with candidates during every step of the hiring process. It makes for a very professional first impression.
I love that Hyrell is user-friendly. The system is incredibly easy to use. We have a high number of users throughout nine locations with varying skill levels utilizing technical applications. All of our users seemed to catch on very quickly.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The main issue I have with the system is that in order for a template update to take effect, it has to be re-posted (at least that's the process as I understand it.) For example, I have updated one of our existing job templates to include a new hard skill question. The template is posted in over 50 locations and in order for this update to go into effect, I have to manually re-post these positions which can be very time consuming. If there was a way to automatically update a posting with template changes it would be a huge help to our business.
Meets all expectations for application processing. Does a great job of pushing the job ad out to multiple online job boards. Provides good email alerts. Relatively easy to use even for my supervisors who are only in the system on occasion.
I have never had to wait for response. Someone always speaks directly to me, sometimes more than once, and email follow-up keeps the issue in the field of vision until there is a resolution.
I does not stack up very well. It's best feature is that it is a 360 HR platform, but it needs to evolve and improve. Recruitee and Teamtailor seem way better options, in my opinion, for the Applicant tracking system. Time off tends to get confusing at times, and employees prefer tools like bamboo or Roots, which integrate well with other tools.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Hyrell came up against ClearFit and ZipRecruiter. ClearFit looked very strong, but ultimately its pay per posting model didn't provide enough cost certainty. ZipRecruiter seems to be a strong player too. There was a lot of flash with ZipRecruiter but the product didn't seem as complete where it mattered for my client. Hyrell was a good balance on feature set and provided good value. The client needed something that was easy to use so they could get up and running quickly. The Hyrell trial went well and the ramp up was very quick and easy. Hyrell's subscript plans fit my clients needs starting with the Solo plan (3 active jobs) and then quickly moving up to the Small Business plan (9 active jobs) after a few months once additional hiring managers came on-board.
Hyrell has kept us moving, tracking and hiring strong candidates, even has we have moved from hiring 1 or 2 people a month to 3 or 4 a week! Great program, good features and fantastic supportl (Thanks, Emily!!!)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info