FileHold Document Management vs. SAP CPQ
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FileHold Document Management | Score7.7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | FileHold is a document and records management software. FileHold is integrated with both Microsoft Office and Microsoft Teams and provides secure single log in to both FileHold and Office 365. FileHold can be deployed on a customers own servers or private cloud or hosted by FileHold on the Azure Cloud Standard features include; document scanning, version control, search, tagging, full user audit trail, archiving and scheduled disposition. Out of the box, users can search the FileHold… | $30 per month per seat |
SAP CPQ | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | SAP CPQ (replacing the former CallidusCloud CPQ solution) has been built to be independent of any CRM. The vendor says that this makes their solution more flexible. The vendor also says their solution provides businesses the flexibility to customize and enhance the solution without the constraints of CRM code. Pricing and product catalog changes can also be made by the users without having to rely on a CRM administrator. | N/A |
| FileHold Document Management | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | In all cases the price per user will decrease as more users are added to the system. FileHold has many optional and custom features that can be chosen and will change the price. For outright purchase of a license there is an optional 20% per year support and upgrade fee. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FileHold Document Management | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 88% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | |
| FileHold Document Management | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FileHold Document Management | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | Agentforce Revenue Management Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FileHold Document Management | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.5 |
| Usability | 6.0 | 7.8 |
| Performance | 7.0 | - |
| Support Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Ease of integration | 6.0 | - |
| FileHold Document Management | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | FileHold Document Management Screenshots | SAP CPQ Screenshots |










