Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs. FortiClient vs. SentinelOne Singularity

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Forcepoint SWG
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The Forcepoint ONE Secure Web Gateway (SWG) is one of the three foundational gateways of the Forcepoint ONE all-in-one cloud platform. Forcepoint ONE SWG monitors and controlsany interaction with any website, including blocking access to websites based on category and risk score, blocking download of malware, blocking upload of sensitive data to personal filesharing accounts, detecting shadow IT, and optionally providingRemote Browser Isolation (RBI) with Content Disarm andReconstruction (CDR).N/A
FortiClient
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Fortinet offers FortiClient, their endpoint security system emphasizing automated advanced threat protection, security fabric integration, secure remote access, endpoint quarantine, and a comprehensive reporting dashboard.N/A
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
SentinelOne is endpoint security software, from the company of the same name with offices in North America and Israel, presenting a combined antivirus and EDR solution.
$4
per agent, per month
Pricing
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayFortiClientSentinelOne Singularity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Singularity Ranger IoT
$4
per agent, per month
Singularity Core
$6
per agent, per month
Singularity Control
$8
per agent, per month
Singularity Complete
$12
per agent, per month
Singularity Cloud
$36
per VM/Kubernetes worker node, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Forcepoint SWGFortiClientSentinelOne Singularity
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSpecific pricing details for FortiClient services vary depending on the number of endpoints, the duration of the subscription, and the specific features included.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayFortiClientSentinelOne Singularity
Considered Multiple Products
Forcepoint SWG
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Data Resolve - DLP - inDefend, Clearswift Endpoint Data Loss Protection (DLP) and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
Chose Forcepoint SWG
We actually have replaced Forcepoint Web Security with Zscaler Internet Access and have been extremely happy with the change.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint [Web Security] services are [...] cost-effective and provide better ROI for small/medium and even large enterprises without losing any important features. They also have controls for all the channels and technology areas.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
We were not yet ready to replace the firewall, so we chose a separate solution that integrates with our network. We also looked at Ironport but could not get a supported configuration (our partner did not support it).
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint Web Security provided off-network coverage which was not possible utilizing the on-premises deployment of the Cisco Secure Web Appliance that we were previously using. The Forcepoint Web Security product was more cost-effective for the specific feature set that we …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcpoint Web Security keeps my organization's users safe from malicious threats, including zero-day threats. It protects against zero-day threats with real-time threat intelligence and remote browser isolation, and provides deep content inspection for encrypted and unencrypted …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
I am aware of another cybersecurity specialist in another organization that utilized the Acronis Cyber Cloud for Enterprise but cannot speak to its usage. I can only say that the Forcepoint products and history of support alongside its powerful reputation is one of the largest …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint Web Security is far superior to the rest.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint Web Security stacks up against them because Forcepoint is easy to install and get running. Forcepoint also has great support and notifies our organization when there are updates. I also appreciate the analytics and features Forcepoint has to offer.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
To be honest, once using Forcepoint for our Web Security, I have not wanted to look anywhere else. The dashboard gives me quick insight of threats, productivity, and bandwidth usage. Again, this is a layer in my security and it fills many holes. I feel safe and I do like I can …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
We have evaluated Sophos, however, it proved to be overly complex to manage and administer compared to the Forcepoint solution.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint was one of the first web security appliances deployed by our organisation for content filtering and protecting from other complex web threats.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
We chose Forcepoint Web security over other vendors as it is the best in its class in my opinion. It is used by a number of large organizations and government agencies and it has enormous expansion/integration capabilities with other modules e.g. CASB, DLP which all play a …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint permits out-of-office protection, and the adoption of an endpoint is a good hit for reaching this.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
The only other product that I have used does not stack up against Forcepoint at all. Given that they aren't nearly as powerful as Forcepoint.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
I purchased an up-and-coming product called SurfControl in 1999. Although I don't know who acquired SurfControl or when, I know that I just stuck with it, and I haven't had to evaluate another web security product in over 20 years, and that's a good thing.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
FortiGate offers more granularity over the cloud, but the hybrid seems to be just what we need. We will be moving forward with the hybrid deployment over FortiGate. We would like to thank the POC engineers for helping us make this decision. We look forward to a fruitful …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
We have not evaluated any other products other than Forcepoint as we have been satisfied with the product.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint Web Security is a much more robust web protection suite than TRITON, and much easier to manage once it is implemented.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint's preassigned policies are a great way to get started. Sourcefire was much more transparent on what was happening to each packet and where it came from and to. But adding in rules and fine tuning the URL filtering was difficult. It took considerably more effort to …
FortiClient
Chose FortiClient
We chose FortiClient because it is one of the popular and trustworthy VPN solutions. It provides stronger security validation and solid web control than Ivanti Secure Connect. it also provides advanced threat protection.
Chose FortiClient
Overally, FortiClient has less vulnerabilities than the two other products. The price is comparable to Citrix Gateway, but significantly less than Cisco AnyConnect. Much of the benefits of the FortiClient come with its ability to integrate with other Fortinet solutions. Without …
Chose FortiClient
Mikrotik VPN operates on open standard solutions like OpenVPN, newer Wireguard, and older much less secure: PPTP and L2TP. FortiClient is available as an app on all platforms (IOS, Android, Windows) and there is no problem with migration and installation.
Chose FortiClient
We selected FortiClient as it is reliable and popular security solution than Ivanti connect secure.
Chose FortiClient
FortiClient helps protect computers, whether laptops or mobile devices, so we can have secure access. SonicWall Analytics helps monitor network traffic, detect risk patterns, and detect network anomalies.
Chose FortiClient
My current organization is using FortiClient and they decided to use it since longer period. The main advantages is we are using it for connect RDP and and access private URL. But main reason is one time configuration is help us to connect it any time from anywhere. It's …
Chose FortiClient
We evaluated both Ivanti Connect Secure and FortiClient but we decided to go with FortiClient due to better pricing, advanced features and reliability.
Chose FortiClient
From the very beginning it has showed more effective and efficient features, from almost any point of view, at a price not this greater than the previous one
Chose FortiClient
The service and memory consumption were too much when I was using those apps, And because of high memory consumption, my system was heating, Slow in operations, and the battery was also draining. For the above reasons, I moved to Forticlient.
Chose FortiClient
Simply put, the deployment with Forticlient is a lot simpler and generally takes less time, consumes fewer system resources, and is easier to manage centrally. The VPN client included with the endpoint protection gives us a lot of confidence that our end users are protected …
Chose FortiClient
Cisco AnyConnect and OpenVPN Access Server
Chose FortiClient
Endpoint protection which can be installed in all operating systems and devices including Linux OS, MAC OS, Andriod, Windows. In devices you use laptop, desktop and smartphones. I select FortiClient because it is more reliable, stable connection, more features, user-friendly, …
Chose FortiClient
Meraki MX has a much more basic set of features compared to FortClient and the Fortinet ecosystem of devices and software. Setting up a FortiGate with FortiClient can take a little more time, but the feature set is much richer. We use Meraki MX is a few offices, but are now …
Chose FortiClient
FortiClient was selected by our CEO/CFO and administration staff. Compared to Cisco product, from my point of view as a user, it is incredibly inefficient and unreliable.
Chose FortiClient
We use FortiClient because we use Fortinet products in our office. Compared to other endpoint security software we've used in the past, FortiClient does everything else others do.
Chose FortiClient
FortiClient is more secure and it is more stable than VPN Clients. The previous VPN was crashing a lot during the day.
Chose FortiClient
Web filtering, WAN optimization, application firewall and antivirus /antimalware functionality for laptops, PCs and mobile devices.
Chose FortiClient
AnyConnect would disconnect randomly. One of the main reasons for switching was a vulnerability in the client that Cisco had no plans on patching. We would have to constantly address the vulnerability once a quarter after our vulnerability scans.
Chose FortiClient
We have used Trend Micro and Kaspersky in the past and currently also use Cb Defense. We were looking for a next-gen AV product with visibility into what was actually happening on our end points when we found Cb Defense. FortiClient seems more like Trend or Kaspersky in not …
Chose FortiClient
FortiClient is a more sophisticated solution that offered us additional features that we could not get from the Netgear device we were using. The added VPN aspect also made FortiClient as better solution. NetGear does offer more sophisticated products, but our IT partner …
Chose FortiClient
We still use Bitdefender GravityZone on all of our endpoints in the office, but now we use Forticlient on the end users personal PC/laptops to allow remote access to our network. They work well together, both have their purpose for our end users.
Chose FortiClient
We selected FortiClient because the price is very good. Also, the solution features are perfect for our business. We like FortiClient and we recommend with trust. If you are a small company FortiClient is perfect for you. Assure security of your information. The VPN is working …
Chose FortiClient
FortiClient has a physical desktop client that is not loaded through the browser. This makes life a lot easier because your VPN connection is always sitting right where you need it, and not behind a certain IP address that changes from time to time. FortiClient's interface and …
Chose FortiClient
FortiClient is easier to use and configure and offers security according to market standards. My position within the company is just to use the program, it was not my decision to choose it, but I think they made a good decision.
SentinelOne Singularity
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity is also a very good product.Crowdstrike is also a leading company in EDR point of view and provide wide range of services and product.But because of last incident happen crowdstrike customer are bit hesitate going with crowdstrike.And SentinelOne …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Recommendation of an outside consultant.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
It’s very easy to deploy from our rmm and delivers fast responses to issues
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Microsoft was cheaper, but way more difficult to get setup and deployed and to manage. VMWare carbon black got purchased by broadsoft, so I doged a bullet there.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
VMware Carbon Black EDR
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Only reason for choosing SentinelOne Singularity over crowdstrike was the cost because SentinelOne Singularity was much cheaper at that time as compared to the crowdstrike. Also, SentinelOne Singularity rating in gartner was higher than the crowdstrike which also gave it an …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity is a far superior product to Symantec Endpoint Security, which is the product we migrated from, when we purchased SentinelOne. Symantec simply missed security incidents it should have been able to catch, and support has recently changed for the worse. …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
In the distant past we had used iSensor through Dell. I can't say much about iSensor because we never really had it show any incidents or activity or reports. It might be better these days but from what I can tell, SentinelOne is the Gold Standard currently.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
There is no question, although they all have pro's and cons, SentinelOne is far superior
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne and Microsoft Defender are both best of industry EDR solutions. We employ both in out environment in tandem to provided complete coverage of systems and protection against all emerging cyber threats.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Webroot is a great product but did not provide the versatility that we really were desiring. It allowed to us to centrally manage, but required policy-based management, and not the endpoint detail we wanted. SentinelOne's central management provides a variety of options for …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne is definitely next-gen endpoint protection which makes it better than Symantec or Trend in that category. It prevents attacks and installs, allows you to monitor and update on the fly and works well overall. Also it is not as bulky as other products so you don't get …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne had all of the major features that we were looking for. The other products either required too much administrative attention or were lacking key features. For example, one could be uninstalled by the end user. We required that the installation be password …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Compared to the competition there really is no comparison. While there are many far better known endpoint protection products that have been around many years longer, SentinelOne puts them all to shame. It is the most solid endpoint/anti-virus product that I have used in over …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
There are in my opinion products with the characteristics that can be [compared] to SentinelOne.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne has provided us better protection than other products we used in the past. We have also seen less impact on the system performance.
Features
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayFortiClientSentinelOne Singularity
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
-
Ratings
FortiClient
9.0
Ratings
5% above category average
SentinelOne Singularity
9.2
Ratings
7% above category average
Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings8.80 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Centralized Management00 Ratings9.40 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings8.80 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings8.70 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Malware Detection00 Ratings9.20 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayFortiClientSentinelOne Singularity
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.2 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.1 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.1 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayFortiClientSentinelOne Singularity
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayFortiClientSentinelOne Singularity
Likelihood to Recommend
Over the years, [in our experience], the maintenance of the Forcepoint Web Security solution proved to be more cumbersome and troublesome with each version upgrade. In addition, it did not transition well to support the large increase of remote workers. We also experienced weird incompatibilities with the client. We have since replaced this solution with Zscaler Internet Access, a cloud-based secure web gateway solution with a client that behaves as expected, is more flexible, and requires significantly less administration.
Read full review
Forticlient works well for us as a component of Fortinet's overall security fabric. We use Forticlient alongside Fortigate and FortiAnalyser to create our endpoint security posture. We found deploying Forticlient simplistic, and our end users respond well to any application notifications and make use of the VPN client with little training.
Read full review
It works extremely well for investigating the root cause analysis of events because you can see so much detail into what was happening before, after, and around the detective incident. A weak point would be when the AI gets a little over-aggressive or doesn’t quite understand the use case for specific tools. Our RMM tool was detected as a pup.
Read full review
Pros
  • This package is one of the few that offers a category, quota time, that allows us to limit certain categories and or websites for staff that would normally be blocked for customers and may not be something that is needed in their day to day job duties. We allow staff one hour a day, broken down into six 10 min increments, to visit sites for shopping, travel arrangement and other areas that are more of a personal need than a business need.
  • Forcepoint has a wide selection of categories that can be enabled, quota timed or restricted at a top-level or you can go more granular and drill down to subcategories to allow for only partial access.
Read full review
  • [FortiClient] splits the traffic very well. For example, when users connect a VPN to the office they are connecting to the internal system which uses VPN traffic. If users access the public internet they use the internet traffic, but [Fortinet] does not route this traffic back to the office.
Read full review
  • SentinelOne provides excellent protection against known and unknown attacks to our endpoints.
  • The recovery option provides a fast, first line of defense against ransomware and other system damaging attacks.
  • SentinelOne requires minimal administrative support making it a very cost effective and efficient solution.
Read full review
Cons
  • The user access logs contain a lot of useless information. I understand this is very hard to tackle as I've seen this across any product that logs web activity.
  • I would like to see more customization options of website block pages.
Read full review
  • font way too small on login, unable to select an option, for example, to see each letter of password as typed promotes errors at login
  • login errors and failure rate extremely high as [reported] by all our physicians and other providers: not infrequently one will have to return to office after hours in order to complete charts or access charts to answer patient after hours questions
  • frequent disconnects in spite of excellent internet signal
  • unacceptable interruptions in patient care
Read full review
  • Possibly for compatibility with legacy Windows OS's and non Windows OS's.
  • Some settings are greyed out and unable to change but I believe this is to protect you from making a bad configuration change.
  • Could do better with reporting at the base level subscription.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is very stable, the organisation has "locked in" the product and has no plans to change or try another product. We have already renewed our 2019-2020 licenses. It is user friendly and people catch on easily when they first use it. The only downtime is when we install Microsoft updates! It has excellent reporting which help in determining how the organisation's Internet is used and also during both internal and external IT audits.
Read full review
Because the software is very simple and easy to use, very efficient, and has a stable connection that allows the user to perform tasks without problems. Also, this software does not need to be configured by IT technicians, since it comes with a very developed and understandable set up guide.
Read full review
Reliable for simple installation and above all efficient
Read full review
Usability
Despite the intimidating Linux CLI when you use the appliance for troubleshooting, the web security usability compensates as most of the Administration of the system is done there. It is GUI based and has an easy to use UI where one can navigate around rather easily like getting reports, checking alerts, looking the whole setup under deployment to check if all services are running in one place though there are other parts to the system.
Read full review
The FortiClient is a piece of software that works super well once it is on a stable version and does not receive multiple updates. However, it will pickup mysterious bugs in newer versions that are tough to diagnose without simply rolling back. The update process is easy, but it requires EMS exposed to the internet to use the built-in functionality.
Read full review
There are some minor issues with the platform that can be mildly frustrating, but the overall performance, peace of mind, and ROI make it worth using. The management console is intuitive and easy to learn, the endpoint clients are simple but give IT professionals enough data to make management easy and simple
Read full review
Support Rating
The is a quick first response to acknowledge your issue and the Engineers never take more than two hours to fix an issue and we hardly get issues looking at the fact that the system is pretty stable. There is also a robust Knowledge Base in the site for known problems.
Read full review
FortiClient is a security suite with which we can keep our equipment well-protected. And it is that in a system like Windows, which is always the target of all kinds of attacks, it is not enough to have a simple antivirus.
Read full review
Their support is good and quick to respond. The one issue we faced was when a non-protection issue arose there was a lot of dancing around trying to figure things out. This was frustrating as it took significantly longer to figure out issues. Lots of repetitive log gathers, screen caps, uninstalls that never seemed to resolve issues. Eventually, the product would be updated and the issue seemed to be resolved, but seemed to be the only solution.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Research known issues with upgrading from the Support Knowledge base, this will enable you avoid road blocks along the way and reduce your dependence on Forcepoint Support
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
To be honest, once using Forcepoint for our Web Security, I have not wanted to look anywhere else. The dashboard gives me quick insight of threats, productivity, and bandwidth usage. Again, this is a layer in my security and it fills many holes. I feel safe and I do like I can just let it do its thing
Read full review
The service and memory consumption were too much when I was using those apps, And because of high memory consumption, my system was heating, Slow in operations, and the battery was also draining. For the above reasons, I moved to Forticlient.
Read full review
In the distant past we had used iSensor through Dell. I can't say much about iSensor because we never really had it show any incidents or activity or reports. It might be better these days but from what I can tell, SentinelOne is the Gold Standard currently.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have had potential malware outbreaks prevented because of Forcepoint Web Security
  • Questionable access of certain materials on the internet has been prevented because of our implementation
  • The organization's network resources now have more bandwidth because of the restrictions the application provides
Read full review
  • I have more flexibility in working remotely, knowing that I have a reliable and secure way of accessing files on my work network. This increased flexibility has led to better productivity, more freedom to work when and how I want, and confidence in knowing I can access what I need to when I need to.
  • Working with employees on the other side of the world, I have confidence in sharing my files with them by simply working on my local network. This increases collaboration, speed, and efficiency.
Read full review
  • SentinelOne has already proved its value by stopping attacks that would have gone otherwise unnoticed until much later in their infection process.
  • The Vigilance team has provided quick response to threats that were not easily contained via the automated response SentinelOne's agents provide. This has given us a significant piece of mind.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SentinelOne Singularity Screenshots

Screenshot of SentinelOne