Foundation Software Construction Accounting vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. TermSync

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Foundation Software headquartered in Strongsville, Ohio offers their construction accounting and payroll software. The vendor states that their job costing construction accounting software is designed to be easy to use and provides the accounting and management tools needed to run a successful construction business.N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
TermSync
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
TermSync is a cloud-based accounts receivable management platform. It helps companies get paid faster, reduce administrative costs, and improve customer relationships. It works with clients’ existing accounting systems and can be up in running in a day or less. Companies can choose from various modules including invoice delivery, customer portals, collection workflow management, and advanced reporting & analytics. TermSync was acquired by French company Esker in January 2015.N/A
Pricing
Foundation Software Construction AccountingMicrosoft Dynamics GPTermSync
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Foundation Software Construction AccountingMicrosoft Dynamics GPTermSync
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Foundation Software Construction AccountingMicrosoft Dynamics GPTermSync
Features
Foundation Software Construction AccountingMicrosoft Dynamics GPTermSync
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
7.1
4 Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
TermSync
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data5.12 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history6.94 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration9.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.7.23 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management5.12 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
7.7
4 Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
TermSync
-
Ratings
Pay calculation7.53 Ratings6.319 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment8.24 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration7.53 Ratings5.915 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files6.13 Ratings7.518 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management7.23 Ratings6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management7.23 Ratings6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
7.2
3 Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
TermSync
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets7.23 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
7.8
4 Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
37% below category average
TermSync
-
Ratings
Dashboards9.53 Ratings3.529 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports7.54 Ratings6.239 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.94 Ratings6.539 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability7.24 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
8.9
4 Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
TermSync
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation9.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing9.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app6.92 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders6.93 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
8.5
3 Ratings
12% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
TermSync
-
Ratings
Job costing6.93 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases9.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
TermSync
-
Ratings
API for custom integration00 Ratings2.526 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings6.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
TermSync
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings5.932 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.240 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
40% below category average
TermSync
-
Ratings
Accounts payable00 Ratings6.445 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings5.936 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management00 Ratings6.436 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation00 Ratings5.741 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management00 Ratings4.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking00 Ratings8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management00 Ratings4.628 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support00 Ratings2.919 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance00 Ratings3.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing00 Ratings9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal00 Ratings7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings6.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings4.721 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings3.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings4.726 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings2.916 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings4.117 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings3.814 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings6.219 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.6
26 Ratings
46% below category average
TermSync
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking00 Ratings6.224 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings1.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings4.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module00 Ratings4.615 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Foundation Software Construction Accounting
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
TermSync
-
Ratings
Pricing00 Ratings3.618 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings3.621 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings1.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings5.225 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings5.39 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility00 Ratings3.812 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution00 Ratings3.57 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Foundation Software Construction AccountingMicrosoft Dynamics GPTermSync
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 2.1 out of 10
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 6.2 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.4 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.1 out of 10
Accounting Seed
Accounting Seed
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.4 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.6 out of 10
BlackLine
BlackLine
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Foundation Software Construction AccountingMicrosoft Dynamics GPTermSync
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(5 ratings)
6.0
(51 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.9
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(4 ratings)
6.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Foundation Software Construction AccountingMicrosoft Dynamics GPTermSync
Likelihood to Recommend
Foundation Software
Working as a general contractor or subcontractor, I highly recommend Foundation Software Construction Accounting. I would not recommend it for anything outside construction, but it could still be used for other businesses.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Esker
If you are one person or managing 10, TermSync allows you to track what you and your team is working on. When to follow up with customers so that no one is missed. It allows you to see if each teammate is pulling their weight and getting done what needs to be done or if more help is needed. The Executive Metrics reports give you all the information for month end reporting and also shows you the weaknesses so you can motivate your team to excel in those areas.
Read full review
Pros
Foundation Software
  • Invoicing
  • Reports
  • Payroll
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
Esker
  • The dashboard makes it easy to organize my daily work and to track customer contacts.
  • TermSync makes it easy for our customers to communicate with us at a time the best works with their schedule.
  • I love the credit reference reports. This saves us all the time of printing, completing and faxing credit reference reports.
Read full review
Cons
Foundation Software
  • I think A/P Invoice approval could be much smoother.
  • Purchase orders should be more detailed able to be issued and easily modified and enter invoices against them.
  • A/P check distribution should let you select checks for ACH payment and printed check in the same run.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Esker
  • Reporting. It is hard for TermSync to create a report for every business type out there so you may need to have some things customized, but they are always willing to assist.
  • The requirements needed to accept payments online requires some information that larger companies may not want to give out.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Foundation Software
There are some things it lacks, certain reports or history audits. I have to call them to do certain things-submit a ticket and wait on someone to call back instead of getting someone immediately. Especially if it's urgent. I have to wait on them to push an update-and they usually run a week or 2 later- to pull quarterly or annual tax forms.
Read full review
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Esker
No answers on this topic
Usability
Foundation Software
I give Foundation Software Construction Accounting this rating because once you learn the software and how detailed its with multiple steps to complete transactions, it is very user friendly and keeps you from making user errors.
Read full review
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Esker
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Foundation Software
Support is usually pretty great. Most of the time return calls to tickets logged are fairly quick. Most everyone is knowledgeable and helpful.
Read full review
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Esker
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Foundation Software
the person from them was impatient and would make comments about we've been over this
Read full review
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Esker
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Foundation Software
Personally,
I did not have a hand in deciding the software, but for our company is has not
led to increased productivity or made things easier. It has been more difficult
for payroll to be inputted correctly and the payroll reports for certified
payroll often come out incorrect and we need to manually figure out how to correct
the issues and get them in correctly
Read full review
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Esker
When researching for this type of product, I did reach out to other vendors. I worked closely with Billtrust in the past and they were lacking in this area when I was ready to make my move. It is my understanding that they have something very robust in the works but I can't say where that will fall on the cost spectrum. By comparison, other companies, like Get Paid had priced themselves right out of our market. TermSync gave us the tools we needed at a price we could afford in the least amount of time and very little assistance from our IT Group, which was a big relief.
Read full review
Scalability
Foundation Software
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Esker
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Foundation Software
  • Financial Management
  • Return on Investmetn
  • Job Costing
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
Esker
  • Our over 60 day list has been reduced by more than 100 accounts.
  • Our DSO is consistently trending lower.
  • All of the customer notes are stored in one place saving time for everyone.
Read full review
ScreenShots