Fourth Analytics vs. IBM Planning Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fourth Analytics
Score 4.1 out of 10
N/A
Fourth Analytics holds HR, scheduling, payroll, purchasing, stock and POS data in one place, as well as third-party data such as social media sentiment, customer reviews and mystery diner.N/A
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Pricing
Fourth AnalyticsIBM Planning Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fourth AnalyticsIBM Planning Analytics
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Fourth AnalyticsIBM Planning Analytics
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.9
81 Ratings
11% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.472 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.381 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings8.976 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.8
86 Ratings
6% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.384 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings9.385 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.565 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.982 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
84 Ratings
2% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings7.879 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.378 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.378 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.669 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
7.9
84 Ratings
4% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings9.384 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.179 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings7.675 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings6.89 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.1
87 Ratings
5% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.685 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.686 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.687 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.712 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.281 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
7.4
77 Ratings
8% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings7.476 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings6.941 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings6.950 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.3
91 Ratings
11% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings9.589 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.591 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings9.591 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings9.590 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings8.790 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.5
85 Ratings
6% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings9.381 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings8.376 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings8.875 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings7.575 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings6.768 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.578 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings9.280 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
86 Ratings
6% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.582 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.883 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.585 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings8.875 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings6.854 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
9.1
87 Ratings
12% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings9.386 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings9.382 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings9.485 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings9.485 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings9.484 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings7.958 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Fourth Analytics
-
Ratings
IBM Planning Analytics
8.9
87 Ratings
7% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings8.984 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.585 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings8.177 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Fourth AnalyticsIBM Planning Analytics
Small Businesses
ActivTrak
ActivTrak
Score 8.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Score 9.7 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Score 9.7 out of 10
Anaplan
Anaplan
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Fourth AnalyticsIBM Planning Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(4 ratings)
9.5
(97 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(5 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(62 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(4 ratings)
9.3
(87 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Fourth AnalyticsIBM Planning Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
HotSchedules and Fourth
Fourth Analytics is just a great system for HR management of staff, the reports that you can pull from it are really helpful, for example employee anniversaries. It is particularly useful at working alongside other platforms such as our hiring system, Harri, and our T&A machine where staff clock in and out. I can’t really say where it is less appropriate as it offers me everything I need as the restaurant administrator.
Read full review
IBM
I would be likely to recommend IBM Planning Analytics, particularly in scenarios where comprehensive financial and operational planning is essential. For instance, in our construction company, it is awesome for optimizing resource allocation across multiple projects, creating detailed project budgets, and conducting risk analysis to mitigate project uncertainties.
Read full review
Pros
HotSchedules and Fourth
  • Break down of hours in department costs.
  • Allowing access to contracts & other HR bits.
  • Access to payslips to go through issues with the staff.
Read full review
IBM
  • Forecasting after taking into account seasonal trends and exceptional transactions
  • Unlike spreadsheets, there is no fear of an user making changes to the mastercopy accidentally. Each user gets his or her own workspace to analyze.
  • For entities operating in multiple countries, connects seamlessly with IBM Cognos Controller for taking into account variation in currencies
Read full review
Cons
HotSchedules and Fourth
  • More Updates
  • Bug Fixes
  • More Functions
Read full review
IBM
  • IBM Planning Analytics was an upgrade from an older version of TM1 that is experiencing some growing pains, some functionality is harder to reach than it has been in the past
  • It is easy to learn as a surface user with created reports, but it does require some technical skills to make advanced calculations and reports if there is no reliable consultant available, much like Excel
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
HotSchedules and Fourth
No answers on this topic
IBM
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Usability
HotSchedules and Fourth
No answers on this topic
IBM
For developers, admins and end users looking for flexibility, IBM Planning Analytics would rate very highly on usability. For example, a developer has access to a highly performant built-in ETL (Extract Translate Load) tool and scripting language called Turbo Integrator that can (among other things) bring in data via flat file or direct connection from many data sources, move data around Planning Analytics, perform batch calculations, export to files or other data stores. In the rare situation where limitations are encountered there is a well documented REST API. Admins and end users benefit from the intuitive PAW (Workspace) interface as well as the rich Excel integration through Planning Analytics for Excel (PAfE). Since flexibility inherently comes with a little more complexity, so an organization with simple and "cookie-cutter" requirements may rate Planning Analytics a little lower.
Read full review
Support Rating
HotSchedules and Fourth
Sometimes it was difficult to resolve an issue with a single person.
Read full review
IBM
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
HotSchedules and Fourth
Not used any others as none like it in the UK.
Read full review
IBM
Anaplan does not handle sparsity; this is very problematic for large volume data sets (many 0's). There also are limitations to the number of dimensions that can be used in a module. If more dimensions are required, then separate modules need to be built and intertwined. IBM PA does not have these limitations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
HotSchedules and Fourth
  • Automated reporting
  • Successful documentation on staff and right to work
Read full review
IBM
  • One of the advantage is on its ability to ease budget and planning
  • Secondly,the fact that it allows for forecasting means based on such insights means that organisations are able to prepare for future eventualities
  • Thirdly, since it can accommodate data from multiple sources means that one is able to carry out best business practices like planning.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Fourth Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis