Function Point is a project management software built specifically for ad agencies, design studios, and marketing departments.
$46
per month per user
OpenText Magellan
Score9 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
N/A
Pricing
Function Point Productivity Software
OpenText Magellan
Editions & Modules
Agency (30-49)
$46
per month per user
Studio (10-29)
$48
per month per user
Boutique (5-9)
$52
per month per user
Enterprise
Call for Pricing
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Function Point Productivity Software
OpenText Magellan
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Customers save 11% on annual billing. Demo’s available.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Function Point Productivity Software
OpenText Magellan
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Function Point Productivity Software and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Function Point Productivity Software
7.9
6 Ratings
3% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
7.96 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
7.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
5.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
6.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.56 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Function Point Productivity Software and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Function Point Productivity Software
9.0
6 Ratings
16% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates
9.66 Ratings
00 Ratings
Invoicing
9.66 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Function Point Productivity Software and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Function Point Productivity Software
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Function Point Productivity Software and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Function Point Productivity Software
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
4% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Function Point Productivity Software and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Function Point Productivity Software
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Function Point Productivity Software and OpenText Magellan
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
Time tracking - like several time tracking solutions, FP uses a clock that will track in real time so that you do not need to remember how long you worked on a project to input later.
Dashboards - I love FP's dashboards that let me track my personal utilization, the utilization of my team members and all of my open tasks.
Reporting - FP's reports provide insight organization-wide into how we are doing and where we (as an organization) are spending our time. As with any reporting, though, it is important to manage the cleanliness of your data to make the reporting useful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Function Point often provided reports that were inaccurate due to bad calculations. The support team would work with us to troubleshoot these issues, but the fact remained that calculations were wrong.
Function Point was purchased by a new parent company that increased prices over their nearest, superior, competitor, pricing themselves out of the market.
Function Point's interface is dated, as is its code base.
New features are being implemented not as software revisions or upgrades, but as new for-pay features.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workamajig was NOT a good fit, after over a year of back-end setup. FunctionFox didn't have the financial integration capabilities we needed, but we used it for years and were happy with the service and support. FunctionPoint brought together the 30,000-foot view of the projects and resources with a simplified process for getting day-to-day jobs into the queue, which was essential for our organization.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.