Genesys Multicloud CX (formerly Genesys Engage, or PureEngage) is the Genesys customer engagement platform for enterprises. It is designed to be flexible for enterprises, who often have multiple and multi-national locations (including outsourcing) and large peak volumes and populations.
N/A
Pega Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Pega Platform is a combined business process management and robotic process automation (RPA) platform with advanced workforce analytics from Pegasystems.
$0.45
one-time fee per case**
Pricing
Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
Pega Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Low-code Factory Edition
$0.45
one-time fee per case**
Standard Edition
$0.80
one-time fee per case**
Enterprise Edition
Custom Quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
Pega Platform
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
**350,000 cases / year minimum. Additional cases available in blocks of 150,000.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
Pega Platform
Features
Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
Pega Platform
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
9.2
118 Ratings
9% above category average
Pega Platform
-
Ratings
Agent dashboard
10.0109 Ratings
00 Ratings
Validate callers
10.096 Ratings
00 Ratings
Outbound response
9.099 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call forwarding
8.089 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click-to-call (CTC)
9.083 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warm transfer
10.0105 Ratings
00 Ratings
Predictive dialing
9.281 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive voice response
10.0106 Ratings
00 Ratings
REST APIs
10.099 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call scripts
9.075 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call tracking
10.0103 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multichannel integration
9.9105 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM software integration
5.199 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
8.5
107 Ratings
3% above category average
Pega Platform
-
Ratings
Inbound call routing
9.0100 Ratings
00 Ratings
Omnichannel inbound routing
10.092 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recording
8.980 Ratings
00 Ratings
Quality management
8.080 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call analytics
8.088 Ratings
00 Ratings
Historical reporting
10.0103 Ratings
00 Ratings
Live reporting
9.0100 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer surveys
6.864 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics
7.073 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Pega Platform
5.3
63 Ratings
37% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
4.062 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.062 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.061 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Pega Platform
8.0
66 Ratings
4% below category average
Process designer
00 Ratings
8.965 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
7.857 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
9.965 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
7.251 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
7.048 Ratings
Support for modeling languages
00 Ratings
5.46 Ratings
Form builder
00 Ratings
9.059 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
8.756 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Pega Platform
9.0
50 Ratings
8% above category average
Social collaboration tools
00 Ratings
9.050 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Solution is extremely agile and flexible. The new generation of containerized solution would be a game changer since it brings the ease of deployment and ability to get the innovations to a new total different place. I believe it is really hard to find in the competition who would have something similar or even close
Pega Platform has introduced the low code feature, using app studio seasonal and professional developer can develop application easily and quickly. The initial application can be build by Business analyst and product owner who has less knowledge of Pega Platform, further application can be enhanced/extended by professional developer. We can develop end to end application and promote to higher environment. Easily we can perform parallel development using branch.
VHT as a stand alone model can be easily plugged into to the current call routing with minimal changes and it works like charm.
Platform SDKs are a powerful tool that help integrate with other third party solutions or to build custom made applications.
The whole routing solution is amazing . With user friendly composer, you have the option of building both VRUs and routing strategies. And, they are very easy to deploy.
The level of details for report customization is another strong point.
Quick development time. Much of the Pega "rules" are easy to configure and implement.
Visually friendly and modern. Much of the UI/UX elements in the system are continuously supported and updated, giving a nice feel to the apps.
Many of the configurations and rules Pega gives to the developers can also be delegated to business users. The organization and structure of the client's business can easily be adapted in the Pega platform.
Genesys needs to pick up the pace with application upgrades. We see more and more issues with Genesys applications falling behind the operating systems versions. We need more apps to be ready for the latest server OC models. There is a lag.
There seems to be constant unrest with the management application platform, CME, SCI, Genesys administrator, GAX, then GAX plugins, then a move away from plugins. We would like one stable management platform that encompasses ALL aspects of management within the contact center.
Real-time reporting deficiencies with Genesys pulse web. this application cannot live up to CCPulse with respect to flexibility of views. Pulse web was a plugin now it's not a plugin any longer. constant movement, we finally get pulse web plugin onto production, 6 months later these something supposedly better.
Genesys Engage is instrumental in us meeting our service obligations to our customers. Engage enables our organization to deliver interactions to the right staff and helps us minimize service and coverage gaps through historical and real-time reporting. Additionally, we feel that only Genesys Engage can meet and exceed our business needs and requirements.
Pegasystems has continued to demonstrate a strong partnership with our organization and investment in their product that aligns with our overall vision and need. Pegasystems has engaged us at every level, with the assistance of minor defects to the overall roadmap planning and alignment of our goals
Overall, from a customer perspective and also an agent perspective, it is very easy to use Genesys Engage's platform. The Agent Desktop and Genesys WDE are good. Usability is high and I would consider it an easy to use product and easy to adopt from this perspective.
Pega Platform is enhancing its product and launching new features day by day which help to achieve customers needs. If I talk about the earlier version of Pega Platform (i.e. pega v5 and 6.3) there were many numbers of limitations in Pega Platform and if we need to do some customization then needed to write custom java and jave scripts to achieve the functionally. Now I can say Pega Platform is running with market trends and demand. Pega Platform is giving all the options which support the current technologies like decisioning capabilities, real time processing, mashup, process fabrics etc..
There are occasional failures, but distributed and High Availability features work well when architected, installed, and configured properly. Thoroughly reading and understanding system documentation is a must.
Never being disappointed in my 11 plus years of utilizing the various aspects of the system. No matter what we throw at it, the systems continue to perform as expected.
There's definitely room for improvement. I would have love to see the chat functionality work more frequently. The level of expertise has diminished over the years. I understand that this in part has to do with the number of new products that has been introduced, but should not be an excuse for the lack of readiness.
It’s very slow sometimes, but that may be our servers. Also the Knowledge Library needs some work - again, not sure if it’s our setup or what- but I’m unable to search the body of an article for content, so I have to be very intentional with tagging, but it’s not ideal.
Good training, but on limited locations. You can almost only follow trainings in europ in the UK and in Germany. Uk location is relatively difficult to get to and on a exppensive location. The content of the training is good, supplied training material is okay, but sometimes a bit outdated. When you follow a training it is most likely because of a recent purchase which is uasually the latest version.
Interesting webinars on relevant topic are being provided regularly. Th e webinars a often provided by Genesys and hosted by a very experienced product owner. In many occasions a customer is invited to share his / her experiences and best practices. Webinars can be watched at a later time for your convenience.
It was a death march. We finally learned enough about the product to know that our vendor knew nothing and had done it wrong. We hired voice engineers and took over the project. We should have fired our vendor much earlier
For a similar contact center structure, I find Genesys products are faster to produce outcomes, and fast to respond (loading, changing screens...). However, in terms of user interface, I do prefer the way NICE did things there. Coming from an agent background, I find that the NICE agent interface is more visually appealing and offers more flexibility (parameters for agent exceptions).
We did evaluate multiple products offerings with Pega Platform capabilities and observed that Pega PRPC rules engine and case management capabilities are better over so many BPM Tools. We also conducted a detailed study with developers to identify the best products out of Suite of BPM products. It's observed that Rules engines integration is very streamlined with forms in Pega whereas other tools multiple have powerful data model capabilities but lacks the ease of creating business rules.
The Interactive Intelligence SIP based contact center platform has broken through the barriers of "board based" technology to processor based limits on scalability. This means their CIC premise or cloud platform can be engineered to support agent counts into the thousands.
Utilizing Genesys Contact Center Portfolio has added increased employee efficiency, providing better availability to customer demands which in turn has increased customer satisfaction.
Utilizing Genesys Contact Center Portfolio has added increased management efficiency, automating resource planning and scheduling and providing management more time to focus on other important tasks.
For one of the applications we worked on, we were able to reduce the processing time on a case from 2 days to 20 minutes by utilizing Pega
We were able to resolve the issue of the routing of cases to users based on a specific algorithm by use of Pega
Pega case management feature was extensively used in one of the application to establish a parent-child relationship which was very helpful for all the business users