TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GitKraken

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AGitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.

    $0

    iManage Work

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AiManage Work is a document management solution formerly known as HP Worksite. iManage was divested from Hewlett-Packard in 2015 and is now an independent company, headquartered in Chicago.N/A
    Pricing
    GitKrakeniManage Work
    Editions & Modules
    Hosted by GitKraken
    Customized according to the amount of team members.
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GitKrakeniManage Work
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GitKrakeniManage Work
    Considered Both Products
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    No answer on this topic
    iManage
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    GitKrakeniManage Work
    Version Control Software Features
    Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of GitKraken and iManage Work
    Feature
    GitKraken
    9.9
    1 Ratings
    12% above category average
    iManage Work
    -
    Ratings
    Branching and Merging10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Version History10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Version Control Collaboration Tools10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pull Requests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code Review Tools9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Access Control10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Testing Integration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue Tracking Integration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Branch Protection10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    GitKrakeniManage Work
    Small Businesses
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    M‑Files
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    Esker
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Tungsten Capture
    Score9.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GitKrakeniManage Work
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    9.6
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GitKrakeniManage Work
    Likelihood to Recommend
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    The software is easy to use and share within our team. Licensing and setup is straightforward. The product just works and we love it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    iManage
    Legal team using this product helps the team to better access documents securely within their email app (Outlook) and the user experience to control the document is excellent and being able to make it private and isolate confidential documents during a court session is very important and iManage has met our requirements. Also, being able to access instantly from users' workstation/laptop devices is very important and iManage plugin for outlook has satisfied our Business requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    • Customizable workflow steps help organize projects
    • Time tracking down to seconds helps to estimate sprints
    • Burndown charts let you know when to plan your next release
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    iManage
    • Very reliable, once setup it is usually pretty flawless outside of Outlook-related issues.
    • Simple and easy to use organization of files and groups.
    • Customizable for different departments or sections to divide up access and partition document system.
    • Allows collaboration with outside parties and makes sharing documents quick and easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    • Timing Out - when editing a story or bug, occasionally Axosoft will time out and all changes will be lost
    • Viewing past sprints can be hard to locate
    • Multiple users within a Story - Axosoft could do a better job managing multiple users on the same story
    • User Interface isn't entirely user friendly and looks a bit outdated
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    iManage
    • Proper implementation of the software is important. We have a client who also has iManage for their large in-house legal department but the implementation seems to have not been as thorough so their experience with the software has not been as positive.
    • Again, proper implementation is key to how powerful the software can be. For a long while our organization did not have the full-text searching implemented, and it was a game changer when we finally did it.
    • I understand that our implementation of iManage does not allow for multiple template matters based on different situations. So we have five default folders, but it would be nice to have a couple of templates, with different numbers and names of the subfolders depending on the situation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    No answers on this topic
    iManage
    It has been what our firm has always used, and overall everyone seems to be pleased with it. It is user friendly and intuitive and it doesn't appear we have any intention of changing what we use for our purposes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    Over the years, I have used many Git tools, but GitKraken stands out. It's now my favorite Git tool by far—excellent graphical overview of the branches, straightforward usage of all functionality, and lots of integration available. Currently, I am using GitKraken to connect to the ADO and quickly create PRs, using gitflow and tracking the work of my team mates.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    iManage
    To me iManage is very intuitive and user friendly. The switch from the application vs the Outlook extension was an adjustment, but it was one I made pretty easily once it happened.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    No answers on this topic
    iManage
    We had an issue a few years ago where a plug-in of some sort which allowed the viewing of PDFs got updated and then whenever some people previewed PDFs in iManage then Outlook would crash. My outlook crashed over 20 times in a single day once. It was a pretty bad time. I know one of our information technology professionals in another office worked non-stop with iManage to get it resolved, and it seemed like they did take the issue pretty seriously.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    I actually like JIRA better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    iManage
    I have viewed several other document management system software, but iManage was already installed at my company before I started working here. For us, I think this is the right solution. Companies with a smaller number of employees or smaller document collections could find some other options that might suite their needs and budget better. We definitely want an on premises solution that provides all the security, tracking, searching, and integration issues iManage offers. Many of the other solutions have adopted cloud technologies only at this point and we are not ready to consider cloud storage due for our sensitive documents at this point.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
    • Productivity bump for developers over previous software
    • Code is never gone forever and can be found if needed
    • Allows us to collaborate and finish projects faster
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    iManage
    • The amount of time needed in searching is reduced to few seconds and organizing the documents by case numbers has been the best ROI for our Legal team.
    • The Automation for index searching and AI of relating to the case numbers increases the productivity for the users within our legal team where error is minimum.
    • Less efforts are required to manage Permissions and granting permissions. Applying APIs for granting permissions has been automated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    GitKraken Screenshots

    Product screenshot