TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GNU Make

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AGNU Make is an open source and free build automation tool.N/A

    Jitterbit

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AJitterbit is a cloud integration technology for cloud, social or mobile apps. It provides accessibility for non-technical users, including easily creating API’s and data transformation scripts within the integrations.

    $1,000

    per month

    Pricing
    GNU MakeJitterbit
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Jitterbit
    $100.00
    Starting Price Per Month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GNU MakeJitterbit
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    GNU MakeJitterbit
    Cloud Data Integration
    Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of GNU Make and Jitterbit
    Feature
    GNU Make
    -
    Ratings
    Jitterbit
    7.2
    12 Ratings
    11% below category average
    Pre-built connectors00 Ratings8.012 Ratings
    Connector modification00 Ratings7.211 Ratings
    Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
    Data quality services00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Data security features00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
    Monitoring console00 Ratings6.011 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    GNU MakeJitterbit
    Small Businesses
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Make
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    IBM App Connect
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    Workato
    Score9.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GNU MakeJitterbit
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.1
    (2 ratings)
    7.0
    (25 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (9 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.1
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GNU MakeJitterbit
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    GNU Make is a great tool for simple builds where language-specific options are not available, or to provide shortcuts for common commands (e.g., "make build" as shorthand for "go build ..." with a bunch of flags). However, it is complementary to other build systems. It does not replace them, which is perhaps one of its greatest strengths as well (works with existing ecosystem instead of trying to do everything). GMU Make it simple to get started with, and the philosophy of understanding how sources map to outputs, as well as the dependency graph, are beneficial.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jitterbit
    This is a great tool for bringing data out of your locked, internal systems and getting it into the cloud. It meshes well with Salesforce and is fairly easy to use, helping the transition from other older, more complex tools into a more modern environment. It has lots of competition in this space and some are better than others, but if your data is straight forward and you know it well, Jitterbit will get the job done. If you are not as close or comfortable with your data and need to do some wildly complex migrations, there might be better packages out there for you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Performance and accuracy of cross-module dependencies.
    • Simple to write and easy to understand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jitterbit
    • UI is super easy to understand with a low learning curve so admins can figure it out and maintain it without breaking anything.
    • It's FREE! There's a paid version too but I like that you can use most of the features for free and they're not pushy with buying.
    • There's a great user community that you can google and ask any questions. Most problems I've encountered have been posted and answered already.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • No dependency management tools (but there are no cross-platform tools of this type anyway)
    • Tedious to do cross-compilation (Debug & Release builds, 32- and 64-bit builds, x86/ARM builds)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jitterbit
    • Migrating operations from QA to Production work well for initial deployment, however, when migrating an update to an existing job to production, sometimes certain project items are duplicated. This is not the end of the world... the duplicates can be removed, but would be nice if it was not required.
    • I have not found a way to trap under-the-covers SOAP errors (for example, when a query you are running against Salesforce takes too long). You get a warning error in the operation log that the job only pulled a "partial" file, but it does not fail.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Jitterbit
    I have been evaluating other tools as a continuous improvement practice. I would like something that would be easier to use for a non-technical user. I work for a small organization and have no back-up for Jitterbit if something happens to me. We don't have the technically savvy employees to understand it.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    In general, it is fair to say the support is sufficient although we do not deal with support directly. There are a lot of forum people chiming in with suggestions or recommendations of particular usage or issues we run into. Since it is open software, patch and fixes will be available from time to time. A lot of information is available in the web now for knowing GNU Make from learning, example, teaching, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jitterbit
    They have some of the best support of any software vendor that we use. They always get our issues resolved quickly
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    I'm a full-stack developer that has used various build tools, including Maven, Gradle, and NPM/yarn. For our C projects, I also investigated CMake and Ninja, but they seemed more difficult to learn and more tedious to work with. GNU Make is a single binary that can be easily downloaded, even for Windows under MingW32, is straightforward to learn, and works pretty well despite its age.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jitterbit
    Evaluated Dell Boomi and Celigo as alternatives prior to purchasing Jitterbit. We went with Jitterbit at that time because we could handle all changes ourselves without any assistance from Jitterbit, and we liked their size and nimbleness. Dell Boomi was too big for us, and Celigo at that time did not have a self-service model. Every change had to go through them (although that has since changed). We were not in a position to be able to wait for someone to make changes for us given the rate of change within the business.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Streamline the build based on a lot of existing component being done, reusable.
    • Commonly understandable, therefore, rampup effort is small.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jitterbit
    • The time it takes to connect systems has reduced by orders of magnitude. Previously, we would custom-develop connectors between various systems and they would all be managed by different vendors. With Jitterbit speed-to-deploy and the efficiency gained by managing all connections in one dashboard has been the greatest piece of the ROI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots