Google App Engine vs. Twilio Segment

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google App Engine
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Google App Engine is Google Cloud's platform-as-a-service offering. It features pay-per-use pricing and support for a broad array of programming languages.
$0.05
Per Hour Per Instance
Twilio Segment
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Segment is a customer data platform that helps engineering teams at companies like Tradesy, TIME, Inc., Gap, Lending Tree, PayPal, and Fender, etc., achieve time and cost savings on their data infrastructure, which was acquired by Twilio November 2020. The vendor says they also enable Product, BI, and Marketing teams to access 200+ tools (Mixpanel, Salesforce, Marketo, Redshift, etc.) to better understand and optimize customer preferences for growth— all integrations are pre-built and…
$120
per month
Pricing
Google App EngineTwilio Segment
Editions & Modules
Starting Price
$0.05
Per Hour Per Instance
Max Price
$0.30
Per Hour Per Instance
Free
$0.00
Includes 1,000 visitors/mo
Team
$120.00
Includes 10,000 visitors/mo
Business
Contact Sales
Custom Volume
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google App EngineTwilio Segment
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google App EngineTwilio Segment
Considered Both Products
Google App Engine

No answer on this topic

Twilio Segment
Chose Twilio Segment
Segment is not really suitable for most websites that have more than 10k MTU - If you run a semi-popular website, there are many tools out there that will do basic web analytics, like Google Analytics. Google Analytics provides simple resources for tracking user growth, …
Features
Google App EngineTwilio Segment
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
9.5
32 Ratings
20% above category average
Twilio Segment
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces9.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability10.032 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead9.032 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability8.024 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control10.031 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration10.028 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation10.029 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication10.028 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification9.028 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery9.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes10.029 Ratings00 Ratings
Tag Management
Comparison of Tag Management features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Twilio Segment
7.6
2 Ratings
8% below category average
Tag library00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Tag variable mapping00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Ease of writing custom tags00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Rules-driven tag execution00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Tag performance monitoring00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Page load times00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Mobile app tagging00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Library of JavaScript extensions00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Twilio Segment
7.6
2 Ratings
7% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Traffic allocation control00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Website personalization00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Customer Data Management
Comparison of Customer Data Management features of Product A and Product B
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Twilio Segment
8.3
3 Ratings
1% above category average
Account Scoring00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
Customer Data Governance00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Data Connectors00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Data Enhancement00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Data Ingestion00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Data Storage00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
Data Visibility00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Event Data00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Identity Resolution00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google App EngineTwilio Segment
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google App EngineTwilio Segment
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(35 ratings)
8.7
(21 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.3
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.7
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(12 ratings)
7.7
(8 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google App EngineTwilio Segment
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
App Engine is such a good resource for our team both internally and externally. You have complete control over your app, how it runs, when it runs, and more while Google handles the back-end, scaling, orchestration, and so on. If you are serving a tool, system, or web page, it's perfect. If you are serving something back-end, like an automation or ETL workflow, you should be a little considerate or careful with how you are structuring that job. For instance, the Standard environment in Google App Engine will present you with a resource limit for your server calls. If your operations are known to take longer than, say, 10 minutes or so, you may be better off moving to the Flexible environment (which may be a little more expensive but certainly a little more powerful and a little less limited) or even moving that workflow to something like Google Compute Engine or another managed service.
Read full review
Twilio
Best suited: - Merging emails coming from: Facebook leads forms, Unbounce or landing pages forms, Google forms, any other kind of lead generation tool and bundling all that information together for a single user "profile". - Passing events generated in multiple applications by the same user (product selected in web, product discarded in cart, etc) and delivering those events into other applications (like a CRM) Less appropriate: - Reading/updating data directly from segment from a frontend application
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Quick to develop, quick to deploy. You can be up and running on Google App Engine in no time.
  • Flexible. We use Java for some services and Node.js for others.
  • Great security features. We have been consistently impressed with the security and authentication features of Google App Engine.
Read full review
Twilio
  • Multi-platform. Segment has easy integrations in many different web, backend, and app platforms/frameworks. We use the Segment SDK in Android and iOS as well as our node.js backend.
  • Segment is fairly affordable for early-stage companies that are trying out different analytics software. The "developer" plan is free and is suitable for most companies with products that have a small user base.
  • The UI is great! It is extremely intuitive and easy-to-learn, and this made it take very little time to integrate this software into our analytics and marketing workflows.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • There is a slight learning curve to getting used to code on Google App Engine.
  • Google Cloud Datastore is Google's NoSQL database in the cloud that your applications can use. NoSQL databases, by design, cannot give handle complex queries on the data. This means that sometimes you need to think carefully about your data structures - so that you can get the results you need in your code.
  • Setting up billing is a little annoying. It does not seem to save billing information to your account so you can re-use the same information across different Cloud projects. Each project requires you to re-enter all your billing information (if required)
Read full review
Twilio
  • More and richer sources. For example, MailChimp is a source but the data you get from MailChimp is quite limited. I ended up writing my own scripts to take better advantage of MailChimp's API because Segment's integration was lacking.
  • Better examples on how to set up event tracking. Pageview tracking is easy enough, but it would be nice if they had a sample app and corresponding code for it and showed you, via Git commits, how to add various kinds of events.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
App Engine is a solid choice for deployments to Google Cloud Platform that do not want to move entirely to a Kubernetes-based container architecture using a different Google product. For rapid prototyping of new applications and fairly straightforward web application deployments, we'll continue to leverage the capabilities that App Engine affords us.
Read full review
Twilio
No answers on this topic
Usability
Google
I had to revisit the UI after a year of just setting up and forgetting. The UI got some improvements but the amount of navigation we have to go through to setup a new app has increased but also got easier to setup. Gemini now is integrated and make getting answers faster
Read full review
Twilio
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Google
Good amount of documentation available for Google App Engine and in general there is large developer community around Google App Engine and other products it interacts with. Lastly, Google support is great in general. No issues so far with them.
Read full review
Twilio
Over the period it took us to set up, we kept going back to their enablement team to help us with the setup, and they were always ready and were very helpful in the entire process. Even with their documentation, they took the time out to help us work through the process. We've never had a message/email unanswered for more than an hour on working days.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
We were on another much smaller cloud provider and decided to make the switch for several reasons - stability, breadth of services, and security. In reviewing options, GCP provided the best mixtures of meeting our needs while also balancing the overall cost of the service as compared to the other major players in Azure and AWS.
Read full review
Twilio
We chose Twilio Segment for the good API integration and node resources, I would use Ontraport again, particularly if I didn't have the requirements for API and development/platform integration. Certainly the set up and management is easy and seamless with both the API and the user interface to use depending on circumstances and requirements.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Effective employee adoption through ease of use.
  • Effective integration to other java based frameworks.
  • Time to market is very quick. Build, test, deploy and use.
  • The GAE Whitelist for java is an important resource to know what works and what does not. So use it. It would also be nice for Google to expand on items that are allowed on GAE platform.
Read full review
Twilio
  • Segment has enabled us to get a full view of our front end activity, join it to our back-end activity, and get full visibility into our funnels and user activity.
  • Segment lets us send events to ad tools with a full audit trail so all the numbers line up.
  • Segment also brings data from other sources into our data warehouse, saving our data engineering time from building commodity connectors.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Twilio Segment Screenshots

Screenshot of Destinations CatalogScreenshot of Destinations Main OverviewScreenshot of Sources Main OverviewScreenshot of DebuggerScreenshot of DocsScreenshot of Destination Settings