TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) vs. OpenText Content Suite Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)

    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them.N/A

    OpenText Content Suite Platform

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AThe OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
    Pricing
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPriced by company size—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    80%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) and OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Feature
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    7.2
    6 Ratings
    0% below category average
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Infection Remediation7.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) and OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Feature
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    7.8
    10 Ratings
    8% above category average
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Network Analytics7.79 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Recognition7.89 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification7.510 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Analysis7.510 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting8.210 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification7.99 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) and OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Feature
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    8.4
    7 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Content capture & imaging00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Document management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Records management00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Automated workflows00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
    Mobile support00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Integration00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.8
    (18 ratings)
    9.0
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.6
    (18 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Usually SOC leverages Intel from mutiple sources. The scenarios are: 1.Suitable: In large scale SOC where more than 5000 devices are being monitored and the tech stack is wide, Mandiant will play an excellent role in that scenario. 2.Not Suitable: In small scale SOCs wherein limited devices belonging to the same tech stack is being used then the analysts can rely on OSINT and it is not useful to buy the solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Great for content management and records even for organizations whose staff are not much experienced in the technical backgrounds as it's easy to use and no previous knowledge on HTML is required. It is great for storing invoices and payment proofs and for organizations dealing with global clients for general use documents.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • accelerated threat response feature, prioritizing threats according to requirement.
    • Optimization of the threat intelligence , and can be integrated with 3rd party tools.
    • Features like - Breach ,Adversary, Machine and Operational Intelligence.
    • Mandiant dynamic host and the malware views along with indicators.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Document Management is being done well since it allows you to put in a corporate folder structure that applies to the business unit you currently work in.
    • Records Management works well in this organisation as it allows you to classify the document according to the file plan, as well as manage it according to the retention schedule for tat file plan.
    • The ability to collaborate on files works really well. You can share with users within your group, as well as allow other users access to the files for either read access to read/write access.
    • Access control of the folder and even individual files allows you to ensure only necessary people can have the right type of access. This is especially welcome in the government environment where document management is of utmost importance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Paywalls exist throughout the data set and can halt an investigation without the right model
    • Some data was incomplete or broken up between pay tiers
    • Navigation through the data lacked a definitive trail or breadcrumbs to retrace steps during investigations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
    • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
    • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence has a very usable platform, with well-differentiated sections for the analyst, as well as the possibility of cross-searching to obtain the desired results. All this is presented with an interface that is easy on the eye and not very messy, which increases productivity and the speed with which work is done.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Strong for Core Content and Records Management
    Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    It gives more ways to analyze threats and options to fixed it. This device gives more visibility on vulnerability detection and its analysis. It provides detailed reports to have more information of all malwares which help us to increase overall security of our current organization
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Having used OpenText Content Suite for a long time, I can say it stands the competition. It offers many versions which is unlike many products in its category. Also, while it is not affordable, I believe the cost is justified considering what a business can achieve with this software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • Improved incident response time
    • Specific investigations that have reduced the attack surface
    • Technical reports on threats not controlled by the bank's local team
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • With OpenText Content Suite, we can easily keep documents safe
    • Document collaboration is easy with OpenText
    • We can easily handle invoicing and automation thanks to features such as content capture and imaging.
    • With OpenText Content Suite, there is better file sync and archiving
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots

    Screenshot of Mandiant Advantage DashboardScreenshot of Mandiant Advantage Actor DetailsScreenshot of Mandiant Advantage Actor Graph