Harri vs. JobAdder

Harri is optimized for hotel companies and medium-sized companies with a high demand for personnel, due to its potential it allows the recruitment of suitable employees for each job

Incentivized

I've already answered this question. JobAdder is easy to use, easy to configure, has great support, has a strong product roadmap, good partner integrations...really a top-notch platform.

Incentivized

• I9 is filled up with machine accuracy. The fact that it is not possible to override the system and hire someone without a proper and valid work permit, makes our lives more relaxed.
• Adding a new policy is done within a couple of hours... for the company that has close to 400 employees.
• Reporting is quick and very easy to handle. All of your data can be pulled from the phone!
• Managing interviews and handling hiring is extremely fast. everything is being done through three clicks.

• JobAdder is known for its clean, intuitive, and modern UI
• JobAdder simplifies job distribution with one-click posting to multiple job boards

• Isn't very clear on how to load your own templates
• The interview calendar could be vastly improved in my opinion, and perhaps tie in with personal calendars on phone/email

• Job requisition process could be more fleshed out
• Would be good to have different levels of access for different users
• Having multiple workflow and email templates variations can quickly make things cluttered

Incentivized

I have never had to use customer support on Harri’s website. I would say that this tells you a lot about the software itself - very user-friendly - which is why I scored it a 7! There have been a few times when it has taken me a while to work out errors on a page, for example, phone number formats. It would be useful if Harri were to provide more information e.g., if you were to hover over the telephone number, for example. It told you the way it wanted you to write it.

Incentivized

It was a very confusing Sales process at Fourth and with Harri, it was seamless and easy to use and communicate with their team.

PCRecruiter was our original choice for a software company to use because of the price and multiple reviews. However, when it comes to accessibility, JobAdder is the clear winner. While it may not be as customizable as some of the other companies out there, it is easy to use amongst the group, can be accessed anywhere, and keeps documents and files organized.

Incentivized

• Using Harri we found that through its functions we were able to attract a large number of potential employees with skills suited to our needs.
• We were easily able to identify and reflect the great time gain and paperwork savings obtained by using this software.
• Harri allows the use of all the ATS tools present in this type of software, presenting itself as one of the most complete at a moderate cost.

Incentivized

• The ability to post to multiple job boards from one platform, along with automated candidate tracking, has saved recruiters admin time
• Rigid workflows make it difficult to scale or tailor the system
• Slow product updates and minimal evolution in core features over time can lead to stagnation.