Likelihood to Recommend HCL DX does really well at managing and maintaining the site. It allows the business to basically maintain the site while IT spent time developing new and enhanced functions. The main issue I currently have with HCL DX is not directly with the product but it does play a role. It is difficult finding skilled resources to support HCL DX in my experience.
Read full review It is well suited for heavy-duty A/B testing where management would like to see and quantitatively determine the effect of a change. It is not so efficient to try for a single page simple form, except when the form is part of a larger workflow. The security model is not very well understood, including RBAC and protection against injection attacks.
Read full review Pros With Version 8.5, IBM Web Content Manager introduced in place editing capabilities which allow authors to make content edits on sections of the page instead of going to the content itself. This feature allows authors to make changes in context of the page and preview changes within the actual look and feel of a live page. Projects provide a collaborative atmosphere for the author community so that authors can interact and work as a team to manage inter-dependent content changes under one project and publish all changes at once, instead of working separately on individual content changes. This brings awareness across authors in an organization and easy knowledge share. IBM Digital Data Connector is a cool feature that allows [users] to integrate external content sources onto the portal using IBM Web Content Manager presentation components. This allows UI/UX designers to present integrated external data in any manner they want, manage UI changes with an underlying approval process and leverage syndication to push changes live immediately. IBM Web Content Manager offers a targeted content feature that allows business users to deliver personalized content to customers based on customer demographic information, browsing history and other transaction related information. Any rules created follow the publishing process thereby making it just a configurable item resulting in less turn around to turn on the feature on a website. IBM Web Content Manager offers 'multi lingual solution' out of the box which allows content creation for almost all popular languages. Syndication feature has improved a lot and it now provides a detailed views comprising of 'failed items', 'items that have syndicated successfully, 'items in queue'. Failed items view provides detailed and clear cut information of what resulted in failure helping IT to troubleshoot problems easily. Read full review Provides quicker release cycle for the way the product cards should be displayed. Provides feedback for new product introduction and how it'll be perceived. Allows rapid blackout from user experience changes that alters traffic flow. Read full review Cons IBM Web Content Manager should provide some easily usable connectors through a GUI to connect to bring content from custom data sources including connecting to Salesforce and custom databases. Should further optimize and enhance creation of rich and responsive content driven UIs on various digital channels. Should further optimize and enhance content personalization features. Read full review Can use better interface for managing test, including scheduling and notification. Feels too heavy for simple projects, though this isn't a factor once past the PoC stage. Notification on various aspects can be made more powerful and granular if such a need arise. Read full review Likelihood to Renew IBM products always moves forward to adapt to new requirements and technologies. I have used versions 6, 6.1, 7 and 8 of IBM WCM, and I know IBM is ready to revamp the tool based on emerging needs, and still provide the capabilities to migrate your old system to the newer versions.
Read full review Usability New versions has increased user experience facilitating usability.
Read full review Support Rating We had some issues related with performing and the support was suitable and sucessful.
Read full review Implementation Rating Implementation was successful due to Websphere application server used.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Magento and Prestashop are E-commerce CMS platforms. They are used in a different scale of application than WCM.
Concerning Joomla, it's a useful CMS forsmaller website. Once again this is an other scale of application than WCM Liveray can compete WCM 7 concerning the : ¤ specific development ¤ security ¤ responsive
Read full review There is a big difference between the two:
Google Optimize uses Bayesian analysis while Optimizely uses Frequenting. There is a risk of counting multiple visits.
Google Optimize data isn't available instantly (if I remember correctly). Optimizely's analyses dashboard is a lot richer and offers a better experience, though it may get intimidating.
Read full review Return on Investment Negative: Very complex architecture for on-premise deployments (too many servers to installed) Positive: Easy customization Negative: Architecture limited to cloud solutions WCM is an old product and needs an update Blog, and community are not integrated in Digital Manager for discussion Templates are not available to integrate basic services (FileNet, more complex BPM , e-commerce) Read full review Almost immediate payoff in terms of the benefit. Easy to justify the TTM benefits to upper management. Still somewhat hard to justify ROI, though this is not my expertise. Read full review ScreenShots Optimizely One Screenshots