Hippo CMMS vs. MaintainX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hippo CMMS
Score 2.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…
$35
per month per user
MaintainX
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
MaintainX helps users track reactive maintenance, preventive maintenance, and control the daily operations of businesses such as safety inspections, quality inspections, and operating checklists with a digital audit trail.
$19
per month per user
Pricing
Hippo CMMSMaintainX
Editions & Modules
Hippo Starter
$35
per month per user
Hippo Plus
$55
per month per user
Hippo Pro
$75
per month per user
Essential
$19
per month per user
Premium
$49
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hippo CMMSMaintainX
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup Fee$600 Single User$8.33 undefined
Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.Discount available for annual commitment.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hippo CMMSMaintainX
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Hippo CMMSMaintainX
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Hippo CMMSMaintainX
Likelihood to Recommend
2.2
(8 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Hippo CMMSMaintainX
Likelihood to Recommend
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
Read full review
MaintainX
MaintainX would work best for any organization that has work orders with multiple steps to complete (especially for repeated work orders) and multiple employees to manage. It would also be especially good for businesses where the work schedule is variable or if the same steps need to be completed regularly
Read full review
Pros
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Simple to use Work requester.
  • Great customer service and support.
  • Not filled with non-essential items like a lot of "Larger" company CMMS systems
Read full review
MaintainX
No answers on this topic
Cons
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Completed work order reporting can be improved. It seems harder than it should be to get the data I need.
  • I would like to streamline the work order closing procedure. I feel like it takes longer than it should to open various screens and add labor, mark tasks complete, change status, etc. It is a minor inconvenience, but just waiting a few seconds opening up a new window is time-consuming with many WO at a time.
  • Labor tracking and reporting could be improved.
Read full review
MaintainX
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I've used Hippo for several years now. I'm sure other programs have been developed since I did my comparison testing. But Hippo has always done everything we needed it to do. It's very reliable. My guys don't doubt whether or not it's doing its job. The calendar view, ease of use and floor mapping set this program apart from others.
Read full review
MaintainX
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their task.
Read full review
MaintainX
MaintainX is easier to use, more flexible, and allows us to manage multiple work orders at once, and the mobile app makes it easier for our workers to see and manage their work orders for their shifts. goFMX was more dated, did not offer a mobile app, and much harder to manage the work orders
Read full review
Return on Investment
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Allows tracking something that we did not have before
  • Decision making is now with hard data
  • Replacement and repair cost have been reduced with tracking of maintenance.
Read full review
MaintainX
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Hippo CMMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

MaintainX Screenshots

Screenshot of The Work Order ScreenScreenshot of InspectionScreenshot of Equipment MaintenanceScreenshot of Regulatory ChecksScreenshot of Cost Saving InsightsScreenshot of Parts Ordering