TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

HP OpenView (Discontinued) vs. IBM Netcool Network Management vs. ScienceLogic AI Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    HP OpenView (Discontinued)

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AHP OpenView, later HP BTO was a system and network monitoring tool from Hewlett-Packard, and is now End of Life (EOL).N/A

    IBM Netcool Network Management

    Score7 out of 10
    N/ANetcool Network Management integrates the IBM Tivoli Network Manager IP Edition, Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus and Netcool Configuration Manager products into a unified solution that consolidates the management of networks.N/A

    ScienceLogic AI Platform

    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    ScienceLogic provides a unified IT Operations platform designed to manage operational workflows using high-fidelity Telemetry Data and explainable automation. The ScienceLogic AI Platform is deployable across On-Premises, Cloud, and Hybrid Environments. The platform consolidates monitoring tools to provide Observability and enables engineers to automate manual processes using Machine Learning capabilities. The platform utilizes automation for Closed-Loop Remediation and provides insights…N/A
    Pricing
    HP OpenView (Discontinued)IBM Netcool Network ManagementScienceLogic AI Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HP OpenView (Discontinued)IBM Netcool Network ManagementScienceLogic AI Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeRequired
    Additional Details——ScienceLogic SL1 offers four tiers: SL1 Advanced – Application Health, Automated Troubleshooting and Remediation Workflows SL1 Base – Infrastructure Monitoring, Topology & Event Correlation SL1 Premium – AI/ML-driven Analytics, Low-Code Automated Workflow Authoring SL1 Standard – Infrastructure Monitoring – with Agents, Business Services, Incident Automation, CMDB Synchronization, Behavioral Correlation
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    HP OpenView (Discontinued)IBM Netcool Network ManagementScienceLogic AI Platform
    Considered Multiple Products
    Discontinued Products
    Chose HP OpenView (Discontinued)
    User friendly, easy to access and more detailed info during the monitoring.
    Incentivized
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    SL1 is easy to implement which is much easier to understand and what more implementation can be further deployed
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    The price
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    ScienceLogic SL1 comparing with ITM/Netcool monitoring has better price. It's more easy to implement and mange ScienceLogic SL1 then other monitoring tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    ScienceLogic SL1 has great UI to configure any monitoring after setup, also has agent-less monitoring that's the great feature against mandate agent monitoring tool like ITM and Zabbix. ScienceLogic SL1 UI has great flexibility to configure any monitoring and modification as …
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    Configuration and User Interface is simple in ScienceLogic SL1
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    Agentless, easy, and powerful. Easy to deploy, maintain and manage. The one-stop solution replaces multiple monitoring tools, has an inbuilt ticketing system, and can be integrated with any tools. Easy to deploy any application monitoring via REST API calls. Dynamic …
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    It is a unique competitor against other tools since it has a long history and it is able to evolve for the future. The concept is tested and worked on from time to time. It has its own positive sides and some space to make it better. It can be adopted for most environments, …
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    ScienceLogic SL1 more cloud-oriented than Nagios. Product support is also very important for corporate users.
    IBM Tivoli Monitoring is a relatively expensive solution that requires dedicated professional support and complex infrastructure.
    Dynatrace is good for performance …
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    SL1 was selected by our solution architects and I was not involved during the selection process. But during implementation and configuration, I realized that the tool is easy to use because of its discovery feature. Also, it is flexible in use and we are able to create our own …
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    ScienceLogic SL1 single tools have the features of all the different IBM tools. [The] main advantage of SL1 is it has Dynamic Applications which provides the benefit of agentless monitoring [capabilities] where it is not provided by any other IBM tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    I was not involved in the decission, it was more business decission. PCA was a product without accurate alarms.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    SL1 stands apart from the others, imo, in their workflow automation capabilities. Giving customers a Python snippet environment to develop customer-coded diagnostic and remediation solutions stands out for us. Some of the other products I've looked at provide similar …
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    ScienceLogic SL1 was the only option for WYSIWYG dashboards when we selected them in 2009 and noticeably cheaper. Other vendors are now catching up and ScienceLogic is starting to price themselves out of their market segment.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    As a big company we use almost all monitoring tools on the market but ScienceLogic may be different since it can be used as part of our offerings.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    In general EM7 stacks up well to other commercial products and open source products. Personally I have worked with well over 25 or 30 different monitoring products (probably 50 if you include product evaluations) and would rate EM7 around the top 75% as it applies to features …
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    Much Better. Support in-house and ease of use compared to Netcool.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    Overall ease of use, cost effective and it's the company's only focus.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    87%
    Would buy again
    81 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    71 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    86 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    85%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    44 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    81%
    Implementation went as expected
    58 Answers
    Features
    HP OpenView (Discontinued)IBM Netcool Network ManagementScienceLogic AI Platform
    AIOps Features
    Comparison of AIOps Features features of HP OpenView (Discontinued) and IBM Netcool Network Management and ScienceLogic AI Platform
    Feature
    HP OpenView (Discontinued)
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Netcool Network Management
    -
    Ratings
    ScienceLogic AI Platform
    7.6
    26 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Monitoring and Alerting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.225 Ratings
    Performance Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings7.826 Ratings
    Incident Management00 Ratings00 Ratings6.626 Ratings
    Service Desk Integration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.525 Ratings
    Root Cause Analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings7.721 Ratings
    Capacity Planning Tool00 Ratings00 Ratings7.222 Ratings
    Configuration and Change Management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.723 Ratings
    Automated Remediation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.620 Ratings
    Collaboration and Communication00 Ratings00 Ratings7.920 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence00 Ratings00 Ratings7.319 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    HP OpenView (Discontinued)IBM Netcool Network ManagementScienceLogic AI Platform
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cisco Meraki Dashboard
    Score9 out of 10
    Cisco Meraki Dashboard
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Cisco Prime LAN Management (discontinued)
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Cisco Prime LAN Management (discontinued)
    Score7.7 out of 10
    ignio AIOps
    Score8.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HP OpenView (Discontinued)IBM Netcool Network ManagementScienceLogic AI Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (228 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (24 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (15 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (14 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (14 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.6
    (20 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (6 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.7
    (8 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (99 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (15 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (7 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.3
    (7 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HP OpenView (Discontinued)IBM Netcool Network ManagementScienceLogic AI Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Discontinued Products
    HP Openview really helped us when we migrated our old SAP Data from IBM Platform to OpenText.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    This tool was integrated with Control-M, so whenever we receive any job failure, long-running job, job not started yet, etc, we receive an alert against it. This tool is also integrated with Maximo where we receive the incidents as well for it. Alert's color was as per the criticality of the job and that makes it very easy for an associate to act on it to resolve. We have the SLAs for the jobs as per the urgency of the jobs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScienceLogic
    For Windows, the issue is in higher resource consumption related to WinRM monitoring, which provides better options then the SNMP monitoring, which on the other hand is less resource intensive. The problem is also with support for OS with other than English language.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Discontinued Products
    • SAP Batch Job monitoring.
    • File Systems
    • Database Montioring
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • This is one of the best monitoring tools.
    • Very simple to user.
    • Color code makes it very simple as per severity.
    • We receive the heartbeat alert every hour that shows the system is running up and fine.
    • We have black, red, yellow, and orange color alerts that show the critical, urgent, major, and minor incidents.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScienceLogic
    • Best overall coverage of montioring different technologies.
    • Easy to use in any environment
    • Customizable being able to generate your own reports, dashboards, DA's, RBA's, etc.
    • Have very good out of the box integrations with other monitoring solutions such as ServiceNow
    • Always improving and regularly releasing new versions and upgrades to the system/DA's.
    • Interactive community
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Discontinued Products
    • Monitoring interface should be more user friendly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Sometimes color differences of the incidents as per the criticality .
    • We don't receive the heartbeat alerts sometimes.
    • If the tool is down and we don't receive the alerts on the console we wait for the heartbeat alert and it makes some extra delay in resolving things.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScienceLogic
    • Dashboards are quite old and are of Iron age. Need to have AP2 dashboards only instead of AP1 and consistent new design across all functionalities.
    • Reporting is not improved since Y2020 and need to revamp completely. Need to integrate Dashboards and Reporting. PowerBI Like functionality to be given OOTB. Reports should be extracted in Excel, PDF, HTML and should be heavily automated.
    • Create and Open APIs for basic and advanced monitoring data extraction.
    • Topology based Event Correlation and Suppression should be improved drastically. Need to identify critical network interfaces based on Topology and monitor them. Basic customization of Dynamic App and/or Powerpack to exclude/include certain metrics/events to be permitted OOTB instead of customizations.
    • Integration with ServiceNow to be improved and to be taken to next level. Automation Powerpack should be made available OOTB as part of base product and to be priced attractively.
    • Take product to next level where we can monitor actual impacted IT or Business Service instead of metrics and events BSM and Topology map to be auto discovered and identify the network dependencies and alternate paths automatically instead of manual creation of BSM.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    It is simply because of all the best possible autonomy solutions it is providing and getting better day by day. Using AI and Devops along with handy automation, The monitoring and Management of devices becomes much easier and the way it is growing in all the aspects is one the best reasons too. Evolution of the SL1 platform in the autonomy monitoring and management is quite appreciable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    The core functions are there.
    The complexity is due to the complexity of the space.
    The score is based on comfort (I no longer notice the legacy UI) and the promise that I see in the 8.12 Unified UI (a vast improvement).
    It is also based on the fact that with 8.12, you can now do everything in the new UI but you still have the legacy UI as a fallback (which should now be unnecessary for new installations)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    SL is always there and online when you need to get info from it. The only times when SL was not available in our own data center, was when network links from out side of the data center was down and those links were not in our controll. Having a central database and people accessing it all over the world, may put a bit of constarin on the performance of the dashboards when reports gets generated, but that is far and few n between.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    SceinceLogic SL1 architecture helps the platform to give a top-notch performance in every respect, Data collection to reporting happens very smoothly. With the new user interface pages load much faster. Individual appliances carrying the individual task ensure things are working without lag. Integration with ticketing tool(SNOW) is well managed by the ScienceLogic, no issue or much delay has been observed while interacting with an external tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    So far, it's good as part of my overall experience, except for a couple of use cases. The support team is well knowledgeable, has technical sound, and is efficient. When support escalates to engineering, the issue gets stuck and takes months to resolve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    It was good, Do the online training first and understand it and you will get the most out of the in-person training that way. This also takes you to an advanced level which is very good and the training as been overhauled once again along with new product coming in such as Zebruim / Skylar, worth going through again if it a while back that you first did this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    There are a lot of educational materials and courses on the SL1 training site (Litmos university). However the recording quality is sometimes not very good - screen resolution is low. There is a lack of professional rather than user-oriented documents and there are mistakes in documentation and education is not well structured.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    Implementation is smooth if we are to just support the out-of-the-box features available in ScienceLogic. For any custom requirement, having to go to SL1 Professional Services is the worst part of procuring this suite. And more often than not, SL1 Professional Services also ask to raise feature request. So, you subscribe to Professional Services to only hear back from them that "This feature is not supported and needs to have a separate feature request". At times frustrating.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Discontinued Products
    User friendly, easy to access and more detailed info during the monitoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    This is one of the essential tools for monitoring. This tool was integrated with Maximo and Control-M in my organization. So whenever any job failed in Control-M, we receive an alert against it in the IBM Netcool/OMNIbus. We receive the alerts in different colors as per the criticality. Black for critical ones(Sev1), red for urgent (Sev2), yellow for major(Sev3), and orange for minor(Sev4). So it makes an easy to operate and act on the alerts as per the severity. This tool is very user-friendly and easy to use. No additional training is required for the tool to operate, just a simple KT is enough.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScienceLogic
    Science logic SL1 is so user friendly and it's really easy to navigate between function. I would recommend Sciene logic SL1 to all of them who are looking for really useful monitoring tool and expecting easy way of managing it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    Our deployment model is vastly different from product expectations. Our global / internal monitoring foot print is 8 production stacks in dual data centers with 50% collection capacity allocated to each data center with minimal numbers of collection groups. General Collection is our default collection group. Special Collection is for monitoring our ASA and other hardware that cannot be polled by a large number of IP addresses, so this collection group is usually 2 collectors). Because most of our stacks are in different physical data centers, we cannot use the provided HA solution. We have to use the DR solution (DRBD + CNAMEs). We routinely test power in our data centers (yearly). Because we have to use DR, we have a hand-touch to flip nodes and change the DNS CNAME half of the times when there is an outage (by design). When the outage is planned, we do this ahead of the outage so that we don't care that the Secondary has dropped away from the Primary. Hopefully, we'll be able to find a way to meet our constraints and improve our resiliency and reduce our hand-touch in future releases. For now, this works for us and our complexity. (I hear that the HA option is sweet. I just can't consume that.)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Discontinued Products
    • Biggest support in maintaining 10,000 Linux servers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Color feature of the alerts as per the criticality is the amazing feature.
    • Heartbeat alert is also an unique feature.
    • No additional training is required to use this tool. just a simple KT is enough.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScienceLogic
    • Once a powerpack is developed and configured for a device for one customer, it is easy to deploy the same powerpack on a second customer estate and configure specifically for that customer without having to reinvent the powerpack. This saves time and therefore money.
    • Once the customer estate tuning is complete, the Operations team have come trust the alerts. This is especially true when transient or self-correcting alerts are automatically cleared without ops team involvement, but a record is still available for audit and debugging purposes. This saves time and therefore money.
    • When setup correctly, it provides good visibility into applications, devices and whole customer estates. This saves time and therefore money when issues arise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    ScienceLogic AI Platform Screenshots

    Screenshot of Unified Observability and Contextual IntelligenceScreenshot of Relationship Mapping & Service VisibilityScreenshot of ITSM and Collaboration IntegrationsScreenshot of Low-Code Workflow BuilderScreenshot of Dynamic Application DevelopmentScreenshot of Executive Overview Dashboard