IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Jaspersoft vs. Microsoft BI (MSBI)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a data integration platform used to understand, cleanse, monitor and transform data. The offerings provide massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities.N/A
Jaspersoft
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Jaspersoft commercial edition is an embedded business intelligence suite designed to be built-into SaaS products as an integrated reporting engine. It provides reports and dashboards for customer-facing applications without requiring app developers to build their own reporting engine.N/A
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft BI is a business intelligence product used for data analysis and generating reports on server-based data. It features unlimited data analysis capacity with its reporting engine, SQL Server Reporting Services alongside ETL, master data management, and data cleansing.
$14
per month per user
Pricing
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerJaspersoftMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Power BI Pro
$14
per month per user
Power BI Premium
$24
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerJaspersoftMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsJaspersoft offers flexible pricing for ISVs and SaaS per customer or by CPU core.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerJaspersoftMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Considered Multiple Products
IBM InfoSphere Information Server

No answer on this topic

Jaspersoft
Chose Jaspersoft
Facility in Data integration was one of the main reasons to choose TIBCO Jaspersoft. Besides the multi-dimension in analytics.
Chose Jaspersoft
Mostly because of better looking reports than Microsoft. Other useful scenario for us was adhoc reports which reduced our development time. We were not satisfied about Microsoft reporting services improvements over the years, and hoped to get more from Jaspersoft. Simply when …
Microsoft BI (MSBI)

No answer on this topic

Features
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerJaspersoftMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.7
4 Ratings
5% above category average
Jaspersoft
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Connect to traditional data sources9.94 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL7.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.6
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Jaspersoft
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Simple transformations10.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Complex transformations9.24 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.0
4 Ratings
2% above category average
Jaspersoft
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Data model creation8.72 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Metadata management7.74 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules and workflow8.44 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration8.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing and debugging7.14 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Jaspersoft
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Integration with data quality tools10.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools9.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
7.6
100 Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.5
50 Ratings
15% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings7.687 Ratings9.543 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings7.588 Ratings9.450 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.886 Ratings9.548 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
7.4
98 Ratings
8% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.6
50 Ratings
18% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings7.289 Ratings9.545 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.397 Ratings9.450 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.781 Ratings9.550 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings00 Ratings9.939 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
7.7
101 Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.6
49 Ratings
15% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings7.176 Ratings9.545 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.799 Ratings9.545 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.759 Ratings9.541 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.582 Ratings9.544 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings7.562 Ratings9.924 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
7.7
72 Ratings
4% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.6
49 Ratings
18% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.472 Ratings9.548 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings7.153 Ratings9.545 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings9.942 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings00 Ratings9.53 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
8.1
98 Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.5
50 Ratings
11% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.194 Ratings9.547 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.192 Ratings9.544 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.588 Ratings9.547 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings7.773 Ratings9.529 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings00 Ratings9.53 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
6.6
64 Ratings
16% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.8
39 Ratings
13% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings7.959 Ratings8.936 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings5.528 Ratings8.027 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings8.141 Ratings10.036 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
Jaspersoft
7.6
90 Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.4
22 Ratings
19% above category average
REST API00 Ratings7.981 Ratings9.919 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings8.062 Ratings9.919 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings7.754 Ratings9.918 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings8.155 Ratings9.917 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings6.558 Ratings9.519 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings7.760 Ratings6.918 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerJaspersoftMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Small Businesses
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
dbt
dbt
Score 9.1 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.9 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerJaspersoftMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(5 ratings)
7.3
(119 ratings)
9.9
(73 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(23 ratings)
8.0
(25 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(16 ratings)
10.0
(15 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(26 ratings)
8.9
(15 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
6.9
(3 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(7 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(15 ratings)
9.6
(7 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerJaspersoftMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Information Server is extremely useful to replace manual developments that require a lot of coding effort. It significantly increases the productivity of the initial development and the future maintenance of the processes since it has a visual development environment with self-documentation.
Read full review
Jaspersoft
It is well suited for the fact of scalability itself and the breadth of features this application has in order to make the migration from legacy systems to the newer different versions more seamless and effective. Data integrity and security are the main aspects of this tool which does not lose their value when doing day-to-day operations for data mapping.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft BI is well suited for Stream analytics, easy data integration, report creation and UI/UX designs (limited but what all available are great ones) Microsoft BI may be less appropriate for handling huge number of datasets and difficult queries. It may also be difficult for a company with heavy data.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • IIS best for ETL ,not ELT , and many and diffrent source systems.
  • It also can process big data , unstuctured data
  • It is not only DWH , you can use infosphere for analys and see the bigger architecture of your OLTP systems
Read full review
Jaspersoft
  • TIBCO Jaspersoft allows you to embed reports into your own application, which gives users the feeling they are using a single product.
  • TIBCO Jaspersoft Studio allows for more advanced report development, such as adding subreports, drilldown to detail reports, images, page headers, page footers, maps, and more.
  • TIBCO's Jaspersoft Domain Designer is very easy to use and navigate.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Comparatively easy to use compared to other data analytics solutions, collaborating with other colleagues on data work is simple.
  • Using Visual Studio for database, ETL, reporting, and analytics development save time and money.
  • Transfer of data from one application to another via Excel and comparison of data attributes between applications
  • Dashboard functionality, as well as Python support, are available, allowing you to add additional charts and graphs.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • I would be nice to have a new web development environment for DataStage.
  • Connectivity Packs such as Pack for SAP Application are a little pricey.
  • It is confusing for new developers the possibility of developing jobs using different execution engines such as Parallel or Server.
Read full review
Jaspersoft
  • One of the issues we found during our implementation was that the reporting software would work faster for certain data sources and not the others. Extracting CSVs and XML was slower in comparison to JSON in our experience.
  • Jaspersoft Studio was the main IDE we used for development. Built atop the Eclipse IDE, we found that the tool was really resource intensive and generally take long time to initialize.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • The race to perfect gathering of Non-Traditional datasets is on-going; with Microsoft arguably not the leader of the pack in this category.
  • Licensing options for PowerBI visualizations may be a factor. I.e. if you need to implement B2C PowerBI visualizations, the cost is considerably high especially for startups.
  • Some clients are still resistant putting their data on the cloud, which restricts lots of functionality to Power BI.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
  • Scale of implementation
  • IBM techsupport
Read full review
Jaspersoft
JasperSoft has been amazing. It is well documented, fast, and transparent in how it functions. We have been very confident in JasperSoft in every aspect of our business and offerings where we've used it. On top of that, their improvements to the product have been fantastic. I am really looking forward to seeing where they take their product and how we can leverage that to please our clients
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft BI is fundamental to our suite of BI applications. That being said, Northcraft Analytics is focused on delighting our customers, so if the underlying factors of our decision change, we would choose to re-write our BI applications on a different stack. Luckily, mathematics are the fundamental IP of our technology... and is portable across all BI platforms for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Jaspersoft
I think it's a tool well suited for a software developer. Others with less coding skills could struggle somewhat with the tool. I find java a little unforgiving as a language for expressions and not very user friendly for the technically dis-inclined. Sometimes the numeric conversions cause issues (who knew that 0 and 0.0 would cause different things to happen). Previous experience with a reporting tool that used visual basic for its' expressions that I found much simpler to use. On the other hand, java is so widespread, you can easily google the syntax to accomplish what you need to do.
Read full review
Microsoft
The Microsoft BI tools have great usability for both developers and end users alike. For developers familiar with Visual Studio, there is little learning curve. For those not, the single Visual Studio IDE means not having to learn separate tools for each component. For end-users, the web interface for SSRS is simple to navigate with intuitive controls. For ad-hoc analysis, Excel can connect directly to SSAS and provide a pivot table like experience which is familiar to many users. For database development, there is beginning to be some confusion, as there are now three tool choices (VS, SSMS, Azure Data Studio) for developers. I would like to see Azure Data Studio become the superset of SSMS and eventually supplant it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Jaspersoft
We've never had an outage of the software itself. If it was unavailable, it was due to a network outage, not a problem with Jasper.
Read full review
Microsoft
The product has been reliable.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Jaspersoft
Complex reports on heavy data load may take considerable amount of time. We have experinced some latencies/misfires regarding to this.
Read full review
Microsoft
SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) can drag at times. We created two report servers and placed them under an F5 load balancer. This configuration has worked well. We have seen sluggish performance at times due to the Windows Firewall.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Jaspersoft
They have a great customer support ticketing system in which they always respond same-day. They offer conference calls with srcreensharing as well in order to better understand your issues.
I wish that the lower level support access came with more than just 12 cases per year though as this makes us less likely to reach out for questions on things that we then instead try to solve ourselves which results in loss of time in trying to acquire new features and or solve a problem.
Read full review
Microsoft
While support from Microsoft isn't necessarily always best of breed, you're also not paying the price for premium support that you would on other platforms. The strength of the stack is in the ecosystem that surrounds it. In contrast to other products, there are hundreds, even thousands of bloggers that post daily as well as vibrant user communities that surround the tool. I've had much better luck finding help with SQL Server related issues than I have with any other product, but that help doesn't always come directly from Microsoft.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Jaspersoft
It did the job of getting us to our deadline we set for ourselves for initial launch. The customer we launched the product for was also there to learn about it at the same in order to better understand the capabilities. This helped greatly so that the customer was on the same page on what was possible when using jaspersoft. I think most people would not want their customers aware the product they are using is third-party but in this case it was a new experience for us both and so as we learned more about jaspersoft, we both had better communication on what the future road map was for their business needs in BI.
Read full review
Microsoft
This training was more directed toward what the product was capable of rather than actual programming.
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Jaspersoft
Resources available in the TIBCO Knowledge Base are covering almost everything. They are well organized, and covering almost every possibility. There is always the change to get back to the TIBCO support or to the dedicated Customer Success Manager whenever something very specific or bound to a customization is not covered.
Read full review
Microsoft
I have used on-line training from Microsoft and from Pragmatic Works. I would recommend Pragmatic Works as the best way to get up to speed quickly, and then use the Microsoft on-line training to deep dive into specific features that you need to get depth with.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Jaspersoft
Having just completed an upgrade to the latest version of Jaspersoft, I am happy to say their support was very good. There were a couple of small challenges which were not easily resolved, but they were primarily related to the fact that we had skipped updates for a couple of versions. The current update procedures assumed we were upgrading from the prior latest version (6.4) to to the new version (7.1).
Read full review
Microsoft
We are a consulting firm and as such our best resources are always billing on client projects. Our internal implementation has weaknesses, but that's true for any company like ours. My rating is based on the product's ease of implementation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
DataStage is more robust and stable than ODI The ability to perform complex transformations or implement business rules is much more developed in DS
Read full review
Jaspersoft
When looking at the different features of these reporting engines, and what we were going to be using it for, the answer seemed clear. Jasper offered exactly what we were looking for, and did so for a price that we were happy with. For a scalable, feature-rich reporting engine that doesn't break the bank, Jaspersoft is the way to go.
Read full review
Microsoft
We have used the built in ConnectWise Manager reports and custom reports. The reports provide static data. PowerBI shows us live data we can drill down into and easily adjust parameters. It's much more useful than a static PDF report.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Jaspersoft
We haven't really started to explore the scalability of the product as yet, but in terms of existing deployments it has done what we need it to do.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Productivity of the development of integration processes.
  • Better documentation and governance.
  • Reduce training costs of various technologies.
Read full review
Jaspersoft
  • When we demo our Jaspersoft environment to potential clients, their eyes light up and they sit up in their chairs a bit more. A lot of our meetings have ended with with the client very interested in our product due to Jaspersoft.
  • Our existing clients have been very satisfied with the adhoc features of Jaspersoft. We've been able to provide them better access to their data on their terms instead of ours. Of course this turns into a huge win for us.
  • We've always used SQL Server Reporting Services to deliver our reports to our clients. Converting to Jaspersoft has allowed us to generate the reporting layer that our clients demand. They no longer feel like they are settling for what we offer.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • As a SaaS provider we see being able to provide self-service BI to our client users as a competitive advantage. In fact the MSSQL enabled BI is a contributing factor to many winning RFPs we have done for prospective client organisations.
  • However MSSQL BI requires extensive knowledge and skills to design and develop data warehouses & data models as a foundation to support business analysts and users to interrogate data effectively and efficiently. Often times we find having strong in-house MSSQL expertise is a bless.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Jaspersoft Screenshots

Screenshot of Report DesignScreenshot of Ad-hoc ReportingScreenshot of Mobile ReportingScreenshot of Dashboard