IBM Planning Analytics vs. Microsoft SQL Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Microsoft SQL Server
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft SQL Server is a relational database.
$1,418
Per License
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
Subscription
$1,418.00
Per License
Enterprise
$13,748.00
Per License
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Considered Both Products
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM PA is like having pivot tables on steroids. Possibilities are endless.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is easier to use and setup for me. Easier to make reports. Works fast
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Anaplan license costs were higher than in IBM Planning Analytics.
Microsoft SQL Server

No answer on this topic

Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.5
108 Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports7.495 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.4108 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.8102 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.7
114 Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis7.9110 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.4112 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.486 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.9110 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.0
108 Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Publish to Web7.9102 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.9101 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning8.499 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.992 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.4
109 Ratings
4% below category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.8109 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.0101 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.999 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.931 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.9
114 Ratings
9% below category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)7.9112 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.5113 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.0114 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.641 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.4106 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.2
100 Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access7.596 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application6.861 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.172 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
123 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning8.3119 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial budgeting8.6122 Ratings00 Ratings
Forecasting9.2122 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario modeling8.9121 Ratings00 Ratings
Management reporting8.3122 Ratings00 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
114 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Financial data consolidation9.2110 Ratings00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.1102 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.2103 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.2100 Ratings00 Ratings
Minority Ownership8.893 Ratings00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting7.3106 Ratings00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails7.9107 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
115 Ratings
4% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Financial Statement Reporting8.0111 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Reporting8.6112 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.2114 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting9.2104 Ratings00 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing6.975 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
117 Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards8.9116 Ratings00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.9111 Ratings00 Ratings
KPIs8.3114 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.0112 Ratings00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.3112 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data8.283 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
115 Ratings
4% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Flat file integration8.4112 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel data integration8.9113 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.7103 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.9 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(123 ratings)
8.0
(107 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(5 ratings)
9.0
(8 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(69 ratings)
7.6
(17 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.4
(93 ratings)
7.9
(26 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Very powerful modeling capabilities. It has a really good OLAP engine memory. Strong scenario planning for what if analysis. Flexibility of integration with ERPs or WM systems for both cloud and on premises. Centralized planning and alignment of governance is also a plus. Having one single system for many different functions.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft SQL is ubiquitous, while MySQL runs under the hood all over the place. Microsoft SQL is the platform taught in colleges and certification courses and is the one most likely to be used by businesses because it is backed by Microsoft. Its interface is friendly (well, as pleasant as SQL can be) and has been used by so many for so long that resources are freely available if you encounter any issues.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Easy to configure and use with Visual Studio and Dot Net
  • Easy integration with MSBI to perform data analysis
  • Data Security
  • Easy to understand and use
  • Very easy to export database and tables in the form of SQL query or a script
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise edition has a high cost but is the only edition which supports SQL Always On Availability Groups. It would be nice to include this feature in the Standard version.
  • Licensing of Microsoft SQL Server is a quite complex matter, it would be good to simplify licensing in the future. For example, per core vs per user CAL licensing, as well as complex licensing scenarios in the Cloud and on Edge locations.
  • It would be good to include native tools for converting Oracle, DB2, Postgresql and MySQL/MariaDB databases (schema and data) for import into Microsoft SQL Server.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Microsoft
We understand that the Microsoft SQL Server will continue to advance, offering the same robust and reliable platform while adding new features that enable us, as a software center, to create a superior product. That provides excellent performance while reducing the hardware requirements and the total cost of ownership of our solution.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
Microsoft
SQL Server mostly 'just works' or generates error messages to help you sort out the trouble. You can usually count on the product to get the job done and keep an eye on your potential mistakes. Interaction with other Microsoft products makes operating as a Windows user pretty straight forward. Digging through the multitude of dialogs and wizards can be a pain, but the answer is usually there somewhere.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Its does not have outages.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
SSAS data cubes may some time slow down your Excel reports.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
IBM support has been very quick to respond and handle the very few issues we've had. We've had a third-party who partners with IBM to be our consulting team which has helped greatly reduce the need for us to contact IBM directly. I highly recommend researching and selecting a well-respected partner to help with an implementation as well as ongoing support as needed.
Read full review
Microsoft
We managed to handle most of our problems by looking into Microsoft's official documentation that has everything explained and almost every function has an example that illustrates in detail how a particular functionality works. Just like PowerShell has the ability to show you an example of how some cmdlet works, that is the case also here, and in my opinion, it is a very good practice and I like it.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It was good
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
very hands on and detailed training
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Other than SQL taking quite a bit of time to actually install there are no problems with installation. Even on hardware that has good performance SQL can still take close to an hour to install a typical server with management and reporting services.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
As it is related to MS Excel, IBM Planning Analytics is a much more robust and complete solution for the CFO or COO in mind. Oracle Hyperion stacks up nicely against IBM Planning Analytics. However, IBM's investment in AI allows Planning Analytics users more options and speed.
Read full review
Microsoft
[Microsoft] SQL Server has a much better community and professional support and is overall just a more reliable system with Microsoft behind it. I've used MySQL in the past and SQL Server has just become more comfortable for me and is my go to RDBMS.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
SQL server does handle growing demands of a mid sized company.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Automate direct data connections to multiple data sources
  • One secured version of the the truth (for data and formulas)
  • Ability to scale to much more detailed planning with option to create predictive forecasts at detail
  • Business user friendly with powerful Excel integration
  • Very flexible and powerful modeling, can handle custom modeling needs at scale
  • Can make the same data available across finance and ops, but at the level of details and timeline that makes sense for them
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Increased accuracy - We went from multiple users having different versions of an Excel spreadsheet to a single source of truth for our reporting.
  • Increased Efficiency - We can now generate reports at any time from a single source rather than multiple users spending their time collating data and generating reports.
  • Improved Security - Enterprise level security on a dedicated server rather than financial files on multiple laptop hard drives.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis