Microsoft SQL is a valuable tool to manage and present information across platforms.
October 10, 2024
Microsoft SQL is a valuable tool to manage and present information across platforms.

Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Microsoft SQL Server
I work for a company that creates a software suite that allows our customers to manage and track their work, their companies and contacts, user logins, etc. We use an extensive database built over the years and several stored procedures that can be called from our software to perform calculations and format data in needed layouts.
Pros
- It stores information.
- It is very reliable, with a few notable exceptions.
- It connects with other software quickly, and tools are provided to facilitate that.
Cons
- SQL does not run on Snapdragon or any ARM processors in general. Vendors like Dell are starting to sell laptops with ARM-based processors, and while Windows will work, SQL refuses to run.
- When Windows 11 came out, SQL would fail after the upgrade from 10 to 11 because Windows 11 formatted the disk with larger sector sizes than SQL allows. This left a lot of our customers unable to use our software until they reverted to Windows 10. Since then, a registry hack has been made available to let SQL run, but we lost quite a bit of customer goodwill. Microsoft needs to test its software, Windows, and SQL on various platforms before pushing upgrades to avoid this.
- Since 2008, the maximum database size available to SQL Express has been 10 gigabytes. However, 10 gigs does not go nearly as far now as it did then, and this needs to be doubled.
- Microsoft was a massive upgrade from the Access database our company used previously. It's more reliable and easier to manage.
- It seems more fragile than access was. I have had several customers call in with database corruption. Sometimes, we can fix it with a DBCC CHECKDB, but we never trust the results and always have them move their data to a fresh database afterward.
- If you're including SQL Express with your product, you need to be mindful of its limitations. One processor core, one GB RAM, and ten gigabytes of disk space are consumed far faster than you'd think.
Microsoft SQL is slower than MySQL and Access but far more feature-rich and reliable. Access is almost obsolete nowadays, so not too many people are considering it, but unless budget or an open-source ethos is a factor, Microsoft SQL is superior in every way. Many commonly used tools, like Crystal Reports, support it.
Do you think Microsoft SQL Server delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Microsoft SQL Server's feature set?
Yes
Did Microsoft SQL Server live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Microsoft SQL Server go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Microsoft SQL Server again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation