IBM Planning Analytics vs. Vena

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Vena
Score 8.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsVena
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsVena
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsThe Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Planning AnalyticsVena
Considered Both Products
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In this case, Vena and Planful are considered as other products that can be compared with IBM Planning Analytics, but among them, IBM Planning Analytics is more optimal in terms of user interface and integration. Its preconfigure risk assessment model and its format and …
Vena
Chose Vena
Vena doesn't require technical knowledge to build reports, so maintenance of the system can be maintained by the finance team.
Chose Vena
We partnered with Vena Solutions because our customers love Excel. This solution provides the ability for our customers to have an integrated and collaborative planning process while still leveraging the tool they love so much.
Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsVena
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.5
109 Ratings
2% below category average
Vena
8.4
154 Ratings
9% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.496 Ratings8.5104 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.4109 Ratings8.6140 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.8103 Ratings8.1146 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.7
115 Ratings
5% below category average
Vena
8.5
252 Ratings
5% above category average
Drill-down analysis7.9111 Ratings8.8239 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.4113 Ratings8.8239 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.487 Ratings7.8100 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.9111 Ratings8.6215 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.0
109 Ratings
3% below category average
Vena
8.5
203 Ratings
3% above category average
Publish to Web7.9103 Ratings8.2118 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.9102 Ratings8.7156 Ratings
Report Versioning8.3100 Ratings8.6170 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.993 Ratings8.6155 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.4
110 Ratings
4% below category average
Vena
8.6
145 Ratings
11% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.8110 Ratings9.0132 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization6.9102 Ratings8.9110 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.9100 Ratings8.1120 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.932 Ratings8.464 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.9
115 Ratings
9% below category average
Vena
8.8
244 Ratings
2% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)7.9113 Ratings8.7229 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.5114 Ratings8.8229 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.0115 Ratings8.8230 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.642 Ratings8.997 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.4107 Ratings8.8179 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.2
101 Ratings
5% below category average
Vena
7.9
134 Ratings
4% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access7.597 Ratings7.7130 Ratings
Mobile Application6.962 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.173 Ratings8.1117 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
124 Ratings
5% above category average
Vena
8.8
299 Ratings
6% above category average
Long-term financial planning8.3120 Ratings9.0273 Ratings
Financial budgeting8.6123 Ratings9.0291 Ratings
Forecasting9.2123 Ratings8.8281 Ratings
Scenario modeling8.9122 Ratings8.4254 Ratings
Management reporting8.3123 Ratings8.7281 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
115 Ratings
5% above category average
Vena
7.9
262 Ratings
1% below category average
Financial data consolidation9.2111 Ratings8.2231 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.2103 Ratings7.7178 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.2104 Ratings7.4166 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.2101 Ratings8.2164 Ratings
Minority Ownership8.894 Ratings7.0122 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting7.3107 Ratings8.0203 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails7.9108 Ratings8.8230 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
116 Ratings
4% above category average
Vena
8.7
284 Ratings
8% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting8.0112 Ratings8.9255 Ratings
Management Reporting8.6113 Ratings8.8268 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.3115 Ratings9.4274 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting9.2105 Ratings8.9215 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing7.076 Ratings7.797 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
118 Ratings
2% above category average
Vena
8.7
229 Ratings
7% above category average
Personalized dashboards8.9117 Ratings8.8200 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.9112 Ratings9.4154 Ratings
KPIs8.3115 Ratings8.7176 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.0113 Ratings8.4191 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.3113 Ratings8.6172 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data8.284 Ratings8.3136 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
116 Ratings
4% above category average
Vena
8.7
277 Ratings
4% above category average
Flat file integration8.4113 Ratings8.4229 Ratings
Excel data integration8.9114 Ratings9.4259 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.7104 Ratings8.4212 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsVena
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 9.0 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsVena
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(123 ratings)
8.8
(288 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(5 ratings)
8.8
(21 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(69 ratings)
8.7
(33 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(9 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(8 ratings)
Support Rating
7.4
(93 ratings)
8.9
(102 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(8 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(5 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(4 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.2
(8 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(5 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsVena
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Very powerful modeling capabilities. It has a really good OLAP engine memory. Strong scenario planning for what if analysis. Flexibility of integration with ERPs or WM systems for both cloud and on premises. Centralized planning and alignment of governance is also a plus. Having one single system for many different functions.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena is great for managing data and putting all of your information in one easy-to-locate spot. It also makes finding data faster and easier. It is also great for tracking project performance and budgeting. It is fairly user-friendly and easy to use from an admin side.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Bringing all of our financial processes together in one place
  • Helps Operations and Finance to see what is happening in real time at each site.
  • It makes the budgeting process very easy for Operations to input and Finance to go in and check alongside at the same time.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Preparing forecasts under different scenarios can be challenging. Your input templates need to be set up to toggle between the various scenarios. We found that certain templates, particularly workforce were not able to easily switch between different scenarios.
  • Connection to Bamboo - initial testing of this resulted in the history being deleted and only showing the current employees. For us it was important to have the history in Vena.
  • No native connection to Tableau - while a CSV upload is a way around would be great to have this since you already have a Power BI connection.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena has been a huge win for us as an organization, as it vastly improved our budgeting process by removing manual consolidation that was incredibly time consuming, and it allows us to see a multi-year view of our organizational budget across all of our funding sources. We've seen Vena's platform grow over the years and we've not yet fully adopted some of them so it feels like there's still potential to get even more value out of the platform.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
I would rate Vena's overall usability as an 8 out of 10. Vena offers a user-friendly interface, especially for those familiar with Excel, making it relatively easy to use. Most features are intuitive. However, some advanced functionalities may require more training or time to master, so it's not a perfect score. Overall, Vena provides a solid user experience that supports efficient financial planning.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
Vena has been available and running. There are notifications well ahead of scheduled maintenance and so far, scheduled maintenance has been occurring during off hours and fortunately has not occurred during a time that is crucial for us to be actively using.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
Vena Solutions pages load quickly and only a few times does it get a bit slow, only when there are many integrations and the reports are long. But in general it is always fast and honestly I am very satisfied with the speed in the generation of statistical reports and the pages
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
IBM support has been very quick to respond and handle the very few issues we've had. We've had a third-party who partners with IBM to be our consulting team which has helped greatly reduce the need for us to contact IBM directly. I highly recommend researching and selecting a well-respected partner to help with an implementation as well as ongoing support as needed.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
They are very quick to respond when you submit a ticket and typically fix issues quickly as well. I only didn't give this a 10 because there is still an open issue with our Salesforce connection that we've been waiting on now for a few months.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
Our initial in person training was a little rough b/c I felt like our trainer wanted to focus on maximizing Vena rather than understanding what we were needing for our organization. He was very responsive and added insights, but could have worked to understand our needs a little better.
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
As it is related to MS Excel, IBM Planning Analytics is a much more robust and complete solution for the CFO or COO in mind. Oracle Hyperion stacks up nicely against IBM Planning Analytics. However, IBM's investment in AI allows Planning Analytics users more options and speed.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena is a strong fit for teams that want to keep working in Excel while adding structure, workflows, and a centralized database. Vena emphasizes its native Excel experience, along with planning templates, workflow automation, and integrations for budgeting/forecasting.


Planful is more positioned as an end-to-end financial performance platform, with a broader emphasis on planning, budgeting, forecasting, reporting, AI/ML-driven forecasting support, real-time collaboration, and enterprise-scale (including multi-entity/multi-currency environments). It also supports Microsoft 365 reporting via Spotlight. We selected Vena because it was a better fit for our current use case and team setup:

Our Operations and FP&A teams primarily use it for budgeting and forecasting, so the Excel-based workflow made adoption easier.


It was easier to implement and simpler for users to learn and operate day-to-day.


It fit well with our need to improve planning structure without forcing a major process change.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Automate direct data connections to multiple data sources
  • One secured version of the the truth (for data and formulas)
  • Ability to scale to much more detailed planning with option to create predictive forecasts at detail
  • Business user friendly with powerful Excel integration
  • Very flexible and powerful modeling, can handle custom modeling needs at scale
  • Can make the same data available across finance and ops, but at the level of details and timeline that makes sense for them
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Automated monthly financial statements saves us 3 hours a month.
  • Moving reporting away from IT has begun to save hours of IT involvement, which will only grow as we shift more reports to Vena. This frees up IT to work on more important IT initiatives.
  • Using budget templates saved hours of copy and paste time when gathering inputs from each department.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard