IBM Targetprocess vs. PractiTest vs. Jile

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Targetprocess
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Targetprocess is a Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) SaaS that connects strategy, funding, and execution. It helps enterprises prioritize work, dynamically allocate resources, and continuously adapt plans. With real-time visibility and financial insights, organizations can deliver faster, clearer business outcomes.N/A
PractiTest
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
PractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.
$39
user
Jile
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Jile from TCS (Tata Consultany Services) is an agile devops platform, supporting users with release management and iteration planning, task management for continuous integration and delivery (CI / CD), and OKR.
$12
per month per user
Pricing
IBM TargetprocessPractiTestJile
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$39.00
user
Enterprise
$49.00
user
Standard Edition
$12
per month per user
Enterprise Edition
$20
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM TargetprocessPractiTestJile
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details1. Standard Edition -$12 per user/per month: Ideal for organizations with multiple program and project team 2. Enterprise Edition - $20 per user/per month: Ideal for organizations with multiple portfolios
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM TargetprocessPractiTestJile
Features
IBM TargetprocessPractiTestJile
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Targetprocess
7.0
39 Ratings
7% below category average
PractiTest
-
Ratings
Jile
-
Ratings
Task Management7.437 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management8.135 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts6.526 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling6.529 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.338 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology5.733 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management7.226 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.327 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.619 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.123 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management6.723 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management7.625 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Search5.236 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools6.735 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
IBM Targetprocess
7.2
40 Ratings
9% below category average
PractiTest
-
Ratings
Jile
-
Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations8.031 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review7.421 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Collaboration7.420 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Velocity Calculation6.432 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers6.638 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Targetprocess
-
Ratings
PractiTest
8.5
4 Ratings
5% above category average
Jile
-
Ratings
Centralized test management00 Ratings9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM TargetprocessPractiTestJile
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.4 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.4 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM TargetprocessPractiTestJile
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(42 ratings)
8.7
(4 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.9
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM TargetprocessPractiTestJile
Likelihood to Recommend
Apptio an IBM Company
Apptio Targetprocess is well suited to track work and progress of that work. In addition it is easy to tie that work to OKRs. Cost and hours rollup across the work hierarchy works well. Our users like the flexibility of Targetprocess and the ability to develop their own views and reports Scenarios where it is less appropriate is to do executive level reporting and develop reports that can pull in all of our time data since there is a 300k record limit
Read full review
PractiTest
PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
Read full review
Tata Consultancy Services
Jile can be used by enterprises of any size irrespective of which part they are in the Agile journey. Jile is an Agile DevOps platform to manage end-to-end Agile planning, execution, automating your CI/CD pipeline, and delivery of value to the customers. Jile itself is a platform to manage agile planning and delivery. On the DevOps part, Jile acts as an orchestrator that integrates with market-leading tools like Cucumber, JUnit, SonarQube, and many more for the smoother deployment of the CI/CD pipeline. Jile will help you to identify bottlenecks or what went wrong during the execution of the pipeline and show you reports in this regard.
Read full review
Pros
Apptio an IBM Company
  • Extremely flexible: We are able to setup work for different groups in ways that work best for them.
  • Fantastic support group: They are extremely knowledgeable and helpful. I enjoy working with them.
  • Automation: Their automation capabilities have saved us a lot of time.
  • Customizing screens: We can go into code for the different entities, move fields around or hide them, add tabs or additional sections as needed to make for a streamlined user experience.
  • Reporting: Their reporting is flexible and phenomenal. There are so many different ways to pull data and the interface is easy to use.
  • Their user guide is well built and extremely helpful.
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Effective Test case template.
  • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
  • Report generation.
Read full review
Tata Consultancy Services
  • Makes DevOps tools integration simple.
  • Out-of-the-box plugins store and additional plugins are included on the Jile roadmap.
  • REST APIs for all key entities, enabling teams to read data from Jile or update data into Jile.
Read full review
Cons
Apptio an IBM Company
  • The UI is bit complex for new users who never used it. i think this can be sorted out by providing the steps to access?
  • dashboards with large datasets can cause performance lags or timeouts
  • Introduce more flexible, template-based RBAC configurations.
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
Read full review
Tata Consultancy Services
  • They do not integrate with any apps, have only DevOps 3rd party tools integration.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apptio an IBM Company
Targetprocess is the most flexible application for tracking work among teams that we have found. This power comes from near limitless ability to customize your views on the work tracked in the system, and from the myriad reporting options to draw metrics and stats out of the data there. Custom fields, processes, and mashups all add to this flexibility and appeal.
Read full review
PractiTest
No answers on this topic
Tata Consultancy Services
No answers on this topic
Usability
Apptio an IBM Company
Overall Targetprocess's usability is good. the tool is easy to use and has features which most BUs and organizations can use. Additional features like AI integration would help the tool and its overall usability. providing additional dashboards for specific roles and executives within the tool would benefit Targetprocess with its scale
Read full review
PractiTest
No answers on this topic
Tata Consultancy Services
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Apptio an IBM Company
Some minor outages are experienced, though these tend to pass within an hour usually and work can continue
Read full review
PractiTest
No answers on this topic
Tata Consultancy Services
No answers on this topic
Performance
Apptio an IBM Company
Reports are fast loading, considering they can refresh in a second or less and we have 7 years of work tracked in over 40k entities. Pages can load slowly when the views are very busy, but not frustratingly. I am a console user most of my career and generally prefer it over webUI interfaces, but Targetprocess won me over from the beginning and I spend half my day using it now.
Read full review
PractiTest
No answers on this topic
Tata Consultancy Services
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Apptio an IBM Company
TargetProcess' support is one of its strengths. The support team is very responsive and helpful when there is a problem but they're also proactive in providing good release notes and engaging with the community through a voting scheme to influence the priority of new features.
The team also releases new versions frequently with new features but with no knock-ons to currently working features.
Read full review
PractiTest
The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
Read full review
Tata Consultancy Services
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Apptio an IBM Company
You should take some time to get everyone to agree how the system should be setup before work starts being tracked in Targetprocess, this avoids difficult and disruptive changes to processes or plugins later when everyone relies on it daily.
Read full review
PractiTest
No answers on this topic
Tata Consultancy Services
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Apptio an IBM Company
I would say TargetProcess is an incredibly wonderful tool. As compare to JIRA Software, it is a fully featured product. It fulfills all my business needs. Tracking efficiency of this application is quite favorable
in order to track all the details from a certain project in just a few minutes.
Read full review
PractiTest
I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
Read full review
Tata Consultancy Services
With Jile, teams can choose an Agile Way of Working (WoW) template that best fits their delivery needs, and then customize their WoW by turning applications on or off from a list of more than 50 applications and features. The WoW templates in Jile include Scrum, Kanban, Disciplined Agile, Large Scale Scrum, Agile Portfolio, and more. This flexibility provides an adaptive and tailored way for organizations to adopt Agile at scale across the enterprise, and digitally transform into a Business 4.0™ enterprise.
Read full review
Scalability
Apptio an IBM Company
We use the hosted version of Targetprocess and have never run into limitations or degraded performance due to scalability. Excellent performance over 7 years!
Read full review
PractiTest
No answers on this topic
Tata Consultancy Services
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Apptio an IBM Company
  • No direct positive business ROI has caused executive leadership to play down use of the tool
  • We are hoping to use this to track progress of OKRs and business strategy, but don't have but in from executives on the value of this yet.
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Test Reporting
  • Defect Management
Read full review
Tata Consultancy Services
  • Cost efficiency on collaboration.
  • More visibility on budgetary which is great!
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Targetprocess Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource Management: Reduces risk by dynamically managing resources, capacity, and demandScreenshot of Program Management: To deliver value throughout a strategic portfolioScreenshot of Portfolio Budgeting: Shifting from project to product fundingScreenshot of Strategic Planning: Continuously links work, labor, and investments to business strategyScreenshot of Workforce ManagementScreenshot of Work

PractiTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of