TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AWebSphere Hybrid Edition from IBM is a collection of WebSphere application runtimes and modernization tools that provides support for on-premise and major public cloud deployments, in virtual machines, containers and Kubernetes. The user can choose any WebSphere edition and deploy Liberty and application modernization tools to help move to a cloud-native architecture, modernize existing applications and support an existing WebSphere estate.

    $88.50

    per month

    Kapost

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AUpland Kapost helps you create and distribute meaningful content to support the buyer journey for B2B companies.

    $1

    per month

    Pricing
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionKapost
    Editions & Modules
    Application Server
    $88.50
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionKapost
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionKapost
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Upland Software
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    23 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    19 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionKapost
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition and Kapost
    Feature
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
    7.2
    31 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Kapost
    -
    Ratings
    IDE support5.426 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security management8.231 Ratings00 Ratings
    Administration and management7.831 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application server performance8.131 Ratings00 Ratings
    Installation7.530 Ratings00 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance6.626 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content Creation
    Comparison of Content Creation features of IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition and Kapost
    Feature
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
    -
    Ratings
    Kapost
    8.2
    9 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Ideation00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Approval workflows00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Content collaboration00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Content calendar00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Network for content licensing/production00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Content Publishing
    Comparison of Content Publishing features of IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition and Kapost
    Feature
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
    -
    Ratings
    Kapost
    8.0
    9 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Content hub00 Ratings7.18 Ratings
    Forms / Gated content00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Embedded CTAs00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Content distribution00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Content promotion00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
    Content automation00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Content Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition and Kapost
    Feature
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
    -
    Ratings
    Kapost
    8.0
    7 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Audience profiling and targeting00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Closed-loop tracking and reporting00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Content performance analytics00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Campaign optimization dashboard00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Competitive analytics00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionKapost
    Small Businesses
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Contently
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Oracle WebLogic Server
    Score7.3 out of 10
    CoSchedule Marketing Suite
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    PathFactory
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionKapost
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (33 ratings)
    7.0
    (12 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionKapost
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid edition is well-suited for the development and deployment of large enterprise-level applications such as Electronic Health Records that are used in our organization. IBM WebSphere is appropriate for organizations that require strong security and compliance as it provides a high level of security and compliance features. This works well with organizations that are subject to strict regulatory requirements, such as hospitals.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    Kapost has potential to be a great asset in small and large orgs. If you're not producing a great deal of content, or coordinating across a large team, there's still tremendous value, but it scales as your org scales because it makes it easier to coordinate and manage large teams and large content archives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition has done marvelous in building and deploying Java Enterprise applications.
    • It also does well in automating deployment and scaling. This has made it easier for our organization to deploy updates to our applications.
    • IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition does well in security by providing features that protect enterprise applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    • Filtering: If you make the most out of your custom details and custom fields, you can gain newfound access to materials that may have long been lost in the ether. It's really easy for us, for instance, to see all of our videos at once. Or everything targeting a certain buying stage. Or you can keyword search to see everything on one topic.
    • Workflows: It's really nice to lay out "who sees what when" in a digital way, because everyone involved on an asset can easily see what stage things are at. You can also set deadlines to tasks, which seems a bit more firm than a casual email, because you can visually see how meeting your deadline fits within the whole timeline.
    • Calendars: The calendar feature is nice for us because we have a blog, so we can see when everything is (supposed) to go live. It's easy to see when I, as a copy editor, should be expecting work, so I can align my day accordingly. Way better than the old-fashioned "mental note" system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Ease of use in terms of deployment, give simple interface to do simple stuff like Tomcat, JBoss or GlassFish.
    • Takes long time to start the server.
    • The Liferay wars need to be decorated and then deployed. Perhaps we could simplify that.
    • Some of the concepts are good for complexity that WAS can handle but could be simplified and better documented, like concepts of well and profile, context, etc.
    • A Liferay war file created using Liferay Developer studio runs fine in Tomcat, however that may not run in WAS 7.x because it needs to be decorated. I had one war for a Liferay portlet with a simple cron job, and had hard time running to WAS server. It was running on the latest free download done on my friends m/c. Other times I have seen that there are issues running a war file that runs on Tomcat but runs on WAS after lot of customization for WAS.
    • The corporations like this however, the product may need better vibrant community of users where issues can be discussed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    • Social media distribution needs improvement. Specifically a calendar for planned Tweets and a better way to schedule multiple shares of the same content.
    • System performance is somewhat slow.
    • Should be an easier way to make changes, like adding custom fields or publication destinations, to all content types, rather than one at a time.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    Mostly we will be renewing unless the strategic direction changes drastically or there are other complelling external circumstances. We've been on a multi year project to modernize our legacy applications and that effort will continue for the foreseeable future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    We are using some other systems that might have replaced Kapost, but none of them had the workflow functionality we were looking for. So, we're sticking with Kapost for now.
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    WebSphere Application Server is used across our organization. Most projects use this for Java products and applications. Being robust and scalable makes it even more usable. We love using WebSphere Application Server due to its configuration management ability made simple and vast across all java related parameters. It is dependent on the features and upgrades and IBM releases some great upgrades to WebSphere Application Server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    The calendar view is a great feature and so are the custom views. It is relatively easy to see a clear view of what content the user is responsible for and then the due dates associated to it. The ability to create and update workflows for the team is easy to navigate and keeps us on track.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    Deploys fairly quick enough and like the roll-out update feature decreasing the downtime and also plays well with other integration tools as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    IBM was quick to respond when we had an issue with our specific infrastructure. We raised a PMR, which they picked up quickly and updated us about every step of the way. We had an appropriate fix for quite a business critical issue within a fortnight, which was impressive!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    The reputation of the product matches up to its reputation as one of the leaders in the space. I love that you can share and access content at your fingertips from anywhere. The downside is that it does not have the prettiest interface but you can get over this with its functionality.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Cleo Integration Clould has many bells and whistles; however, when we added more maps and trading partners, it really slowed down. We found that the Cleo support was very slow to respond and there was a language barrier. IBM Websphere had better customer support and its processing was much faster than Cleo Integration Cloud
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    Workfront has a lot of great features, but Kapost was the right tool for what we needed at the time. With a team of our size, we had to make sure we weren't biting off more than we could chew and the project never got off the ground. We had to be thoughtful with how we rolled it out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Upland Software
    It's easy to expand across an organization and the software is continuously being improved with new features rolled out to all users
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Continuous uptime of the business applications we manage
    • It's now much simpler for me to build and deploy cloud-native applications.
    • Because it can offload for me management and maintenance of the application server to IBM I can focus on the development, deployment and testing of the applications which is more important
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Upland Software
    • It allows us all to compare other email campaigns to each other. We are also able to get almost instant results.
    • By having a working one system - we all can expect the same quality newsletters versus using an outside designer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots