IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Submittable
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Submittable offers tools to launch, measure, and grow social impact programs, locally and globally. From grants and scholarships to awards and CSR programs, Submittable partners with users to make a difference. The vendor states Submittable has supported over 95,000 social impact programs, receiving nearly 20 million applications, and that teams save an average of 12 hours per week and launch in an average of 14 days.
$10,000
per year
Pricing
IFS Applications
Submittable
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Submittable
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Submittable
Features
IFS Applications
Submittable
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.4
3 Ratings
50% below category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
6.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
5.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.1
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Billing Management
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.4
2 Ratings
24% above category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
22% above category average
Submittable
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Submittable is great for grant management, grantmaking, and scholarship awards. It's a very useful tool also when there are multiple reviewers and committees involved in the assessment of the application. The table feature is helpful, but to download the information in a usable report is a pain. Overall a very useful tool for funding.
Form-logic: Allows application forms to adjust based on answers to crucial questions (if-then-else) so that all applications don't have to see extended questions that may not apply to them or their situation.
Messaging Platform: This platform allows interactions with applicants or internal review teams to be associated with the specific submission, allowing for an easier, complete view of an application being considered and as an audit trail.
Good Voting/Polling Management: It makes it easier to record the latest vote/feedback from assigned team members and allows customization of the vote/feedback review as a form. It also summarizes the votes for easy review in a submissions dashboard view.
We are some of the earliest users of employee volunteerism, so there have been some things to work out. However, because of that, we've gotten a lot of one-on-one support to help make minor tweaks to the system in a way that works for us.
We use this software annually to help with our grant processes. Without it, I'd be so lost! Our team relies on the data from our past years to sift applications and we try to prioritize those who have applied and been a finalist but perhaps didn't win in years prior
A submittable requires a great deal of thought to set up. It would be best if you really did an outline and flowcharting. Once you have a detailed plan and set up the system, you have to think of the process that you would manually do step-by-step to deal with the what-ifs; it’s beautiful. The ability to Clone events is invaluable. The onboarding can be complex, but the ease of use afterward is worth it.
We have thankfully never experienced an outage nor been affected by a technology issue on Submittable's side that has delayed our grant process. We have instead been able to distribute over $6M in donated dollars to AAPI small business owners because Submittable is trustworthy and available
We've had a quick and efficient submittable experience that has always been easy to use. When we need a report it downloads within seconds, even the larger reports are 30 seconds or less to download. Pages are quick to load and reports complete in a more than reasonable time frame
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
I think that they are good at answering our questions and solving our problems. We occasionally get reports from applicants about problems the Submittable team has not solved, but I do not know what the applicant has done to get the problem solved.
We have been using this for many years but my memory is that we had a human walk us through how to use basic features. We also used the resource library to learn about specific topics or issues as they came up.
10/10 because we were able to meet virtually and still get all of our questions answered! Online was effective too because we could easily record the sessions and review them later. Since we had to onboard our reviewers virtually, it was actually convenient that this was the same method we learned how to use the entire program virtually too.
I would say, provide Submittable as much detailed information on your planned use of the platform and your desires with the platform as possible, and the implementation will be tailored to accommodate your organization with minimal lag time and issues/problems.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Submittable isn't in the same league as these other platforms. It's trying to get there but it's been a rocky road. Neither customer support nor the account people we've dealt with at Submittable seem particularly knowledgeable about how the product actually works for foundations and can't provide detailed recommendations for how to use the product more effectively. The decision to use Submittable was made before I came on board. We are moving to another platform next year, probably SmartSimple.
I wish we could choose our own number of applications we want for the year and have the price be changed because we are in-between buyable numbers and always have to add more applications at the end of the year
We have been easily able to grow. Not only are we able to process different applications, but Submittable makes it easy to add applications onto our plan. Additionally, their eligibility form before the application does a good job of screening applicants so we do not pay for extra applications.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.