Ivenza vs. Oracle CPQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ivenza
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$75
per month
Oracle CPQ
Score 4.9 out of 10
N/A
Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Pricing
IvenzaOracle CPQ
Editions & Modules
Basic
$75
per month
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IvenzaOracle CPQ
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IvenzaOracle CPQ
Considered Both Products
Ivenza

No answer on this topic

Oracle CPQ
Chose Oracle CPQ
Oracle CPQ was only selected as they had bought FPX and were discontinuing that product.
Chose Oracle CPQ
The company had already invested in the tool, so to make enterprise standard, Oracle CPQ was chosen.
Chose Oracle CPQ
Oracle CPQ is more flexible and user-friendly, and it has the necessary features, which helps us with long term maintenance for our product configuration rules.
Chose Oracle CPQ
Oracle CPQ is a mature product, compared to other vendors.
Chose Oracle CPQ
We considered Salesforce. Oracle CPQ gives us more flexibility.
Chose Oracle CPQ
Salesforce forces one to one relationship with their CRM. We wanted one single centralized hub. Apttus wasn't robust enough overall.
Chose Oracle CPQ
None. CPQ is the best so I never tried to look for anything else.
Chose Oracle CPQ
The other tools were fine, but they could not stack up against the power of Oracle CPQ (formerly BigMachines). Hands down Oracle CPQ blew everyone else out of the water.
Chose Oracle CPQ
We debated a few different options, including a home-grown custom program, uCommerce, and just using only Oracle Commerce Cloud. Since we had already decided to use Oracle Commerce Cloud over uCommerce, the integrations available between OCC, Oracle's ERP system, and Oracle …
Chose Oracle CPQ
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
Chose Oracle CPQ
I'm not very familiar with CPQ alternatives but Oracle (BigMachines) is one of if not the best and largest players in the market. BigMachines founders actually created another alternative after their non-compete agreements ended with Oracle who they sold to. I'm sure their …
Chose Oracle CPQ
Our primary concern was a product configurator. Our product configurations and rules are complex and we felt that Oracle CPQ Cloud was best able to demonstrate that they could handle our complex rules. Further, we are an Oracle EBS shop and look forward to an easier time …
Chose Oracle CPQ
BigMachines was chosen by the client company. My task was to automate the interface.
Chose Oracle CPQ
I don't remember exactly which other products I tested, but it eventually came down to pricing and ease of use vs the other solutions. We were in a situation where we needed a budget-conscious solution that wouldn't break the bank. All the other products we tested were way …
Chose Oracle CPQ
BigMachines has many features that other products don't.
Chose Oracle CPQ
BigMachines is very customizable to support complex product configurations and [has the] ability to support price books, as we use different marketplace prices for the same product (SKU) seamless Salesforce integration, which is very good and it's easy to export and import data …
Chose Oracle CPQ
I haven't explored other CPQ vendor options. But I've heard that Selectica's Salesforce/CRM integration capabilities make the software worth exploring.
Chose Oracle CPQ
Bigmachines is by far the best Salesforce integrated CPQ platform.
Chose Oracle CPQ
Apttus, Evapt and some other Salesforce.com add-ons. We felt other solutions could not handle complex order outputs. They had simplistic printer friendlies – could not do split splinter friendlies. Their configuration engines lacked the ability to support complex business rules …
Chose Oracle CPQ
Our shortlist beyond Big Machines was: 1) Apptus – Their biggest downfall was their lack of responsiveness in the sales cycle. It made us very nervous about their ability to be responsive post sale. 2) Using the Salesforce.com Opportunity Products feature. Salesforce.com native …
Features
IvenzaOracle CPQ
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
Ivenza
-
Ratings
Oracle CPQ
6.7
Ratings
26% below category average
Quote sharing/sending00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Product configuration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Configuration options00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Pricing rules00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Price adjustment00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Order capturing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IvenzaOracle CPQ
Small Businesses
SketchUp
SketchUp
Score 8.3 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SketchUp
SketchUp
Score 8.3 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Agentforce Revenue Management
Agentforce Revenue Management
Score 8.6 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IvenzaOracle CPQ
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IvenzaOracle CPQ
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Leveraged automation to minimize headcount costs despite 10% year-over-year business growth, and enabled staff to focus on more strategic tasks.
  • Established a flexible CPQ system that scales on demand to easily accommodate the company’s multiple global locations.
  • Improved customer relations by reducing configuration time and allowing sales more time to meet with customers and close orders.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Advanced coding for some areas in config and pricing engine are written in BML. This Java-like code may be a bit tricky for someone trying to write very advanced configuration rules or advanced pricing.
  • The flagship system needs to have an easier way to enter in pricing. In the BMX version, pricing is handled through multiple matricies, but in the flagship it is compiled into one ugly rule.
  • Customization. Other software comes with tools to help customize the "look and feel" quickly. To get a re-vamped look on the flagship product, you'll need a CSS expert.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
While they have a decent administrator interface (relative to other apps), the part that is unintuitive is the printer friendly output. I view this is as the meat and potatoes. They are very constrained on these abilities. To make a font change is really cumbersome. There is no content management protocol to protocol. This kills us.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Other than one day two years ago and an hour or two a few times since then due to data center outages, it has been very reliable
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Like with any implementation go into it with a clear and realistic plan for getting the implementation completed and it will go much smoother. BigMachines has a clear process and an excellent staff fort getting an implementation completed we just needed to follow more of it instead of creating our own roadblocks
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We debated a few different options, including a home-grown custom program, uCommerce, and just using only Oracle Commerce Cloud. Since we had already decided to use Oracle Commerce Cloud over uCommerce, the integrations available between OCC, Oracle's ERP system, and Oracle CPQ definitely seemed like the easiest option with the greatest benefits. However, the cost/benefit of Oracle CPQ was more apparent when we were ready to launch more complex configurations across all of our product groups.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Sales Operations or IT would have a better understanding of the license user costs and ROI. I do know that Sales has experienced frustrations in the the lead gen-to-close process and have experienced delays with some deals. In other instances, the software has worked fine. I would love to see an analysis on how our lead-conversion rate, sales cycles, and proposal volume stacks up.
Read full review
ScreenShots