Jirav vs. Synoptix

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jirav
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Jirav, headquartered in San Francisco, aims to deliver smarter financials and faster insights, helping to understand where a business has been and predict where it will go. The system joins cloud-based Accounting, HR, CRM and billing data to automatically surface an interconnected model that is unique to a business. The solution helps eradicate spreadsheet errors, produce monthly reports that occur in real-time, and connected data enables teams to collaborate on multiple scenarios – bookings,…
$10,000
per year
Synoptix
Score 7.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Synoptic provides ERP financial reporting tools and analysis. This solution is designed to deliver real-time data. The vendor’s value proposition is that their solution empowers users to create financial and operational reports with spreadsheet ease of use.N/A
Pricing
JiravSynoptix
Editions & Modules
Starter
$10,000
per year
Pro
$15,000
per year
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JiravSynoptix
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JiravSynoptix
Features
JiravSynoptix
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
6.0
5 Ratings
24% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings5.83 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings5.85 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings6.44 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
7.4
7 Ratings
9% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings7.37 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
7.7
5 Ratings
7% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings7.64 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.45 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.63 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
6.9
3 Ratings
11% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings7.33 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings6.82 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings6.82 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings6.82 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
7.6
6 Ratings
12% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings7.36 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings7.75 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings7.35 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings7.86 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
6.7
4 Ratings
12% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings6.82 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings6.73 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
6.6
8 Ratings
22% below category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings6.06 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings6.57 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings6.64 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings5.94 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings7.88 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
7.6
7 Ratings
4% below category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings8.26 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings7.14 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings6.82 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings7.55 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings7.46 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
7.2
8 Ratings
11% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings7.18 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings7.78 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings7.37 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings5.83 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
6.5
6 Ratings
22% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings6.46 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings5.94 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings6.73 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings6.73 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings6.73 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings6.73 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Jirav
-
Ratings
Synoptix
7.4
6 Ratings
11% below category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings7.33 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings6.96 Ratings
Best Alternatives
JiravSynoptix
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JiravSynoptix
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(1 ratings)
7.5
(18 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
JiravSynoptix
Likelihood to Recommend
Jirav
I feel that Jirav would be best suited for companies with less than 75 employees that need a more robust software than Fathom (Quickbooks Onlne integrated FP&A tool based in Australia) that is very customizable, with simple revenue modeling, few personnel changes every month, few departments, no multi currency, and need collaboration only with top-level personnel. I think Jirav is a product that is being highly recommended in the accounting industry for outsourced accounting firms, but accounting only looks at historical information and there needs to more finance industry influence, approval, and input so they can improve their product.
Read full review
Synoptix
Synoptix has been great for us to allow end users access to the data and information they need to make informed decisions without letting them have full access to all ERP functions. It has also been very easy to create custom reports that meet our needs. It is also nimble enough to create quick reports that are needed with a small turnaround
Read full review
Pros
Jirav
  • Jirav integrates well with Quickbooks Online (QBO), and I like how you can easily customize the reporting presentation by combining GL accounts and showing more or less details as needed for managerial reporting
  • I like that Jirav is browser-based and that I can easily share reports with internal and external parties for comments
  • I feel more confident using Jirav than I do with Excel because there is more data validation, and some notifications will appear if there are errors in the model
  • The sales capacity model and ramping employees schedule that their implementation / professional services team built for us works well overall (with some limitations)
  • Ideally, having a direct integration into Jirav would be great for all our data. However, some of our software didn't have a direct integration, so I was glad that Jirav offered the ability to use a connected Google Sheet that lets me input data that can be imported directly into the system
Read full review
Synoptix
  • Easy report building interface with an query interface that allows financial users the ability to conduct complex queries without difficulty.
  • The ability to create reporting that allows us to review in-depth financial review by drilling down into accounts to find transnational data easily.
  • Easily maintained and monitored with simple upgrade installations and end point installation.
  • Great knowledge base for review and trouble-shooting.
  • Highly knowledgeable and easy to work with staff.
Read full review
Cons
Jirav
  • At times, I feel that Jirav is too customizable. It would be great if they could tailor the system to be more industry-specific. For example, if the system could provide standard formulas for SaaS industry metrics already within the system, then that would have saved me a ton of time with having to create the metrics myself. The formula creation for metrics is quite tedious as well because you can only do simple calculations, such as A + B or A x C. You cannot do A + B + C or A x B x C.
  • I struggle with the way they have their staff planning set up because I have to reimport an Excel every month with all the changes (new hires, terminations, pay changes), and the changes appear to be retroactive on reports, which doesn't make sense if someone receives a raise or pay change during the year. It would be much easier for planning for bookings if they could add a column for quota by salesperson.
  • If there are notifications of errors in the model, then the notifications will continue to present themselves after I resolve the issue. It would be nice if I could clear out notifications I know are not relevant anymore. I also still find errors in the system that I would have expected the system to notify me about, such as Assumptions that are set up but they are not included in any formulas, so I should delete that assumption to prevent anyone from thinking changing that assumption will impact the model.
  • There is some functionality for sharing reports and information, but there is not enough granularity in security settings to allow me to share certain information easily. For example, if I want to share information with managers to manage their departments' budget, but also not see their boss' compensation, then it takes some work to set that up. Or, if I want to share a report with a recruiter of planned headcount and salary, then I need to export it to Excel first and delete Actual headcount and salary, so they don't see current employees' compensation (including the person's boss' salary).
  • Customer and vendor names do not import, only the totals, so if you look at Actuals vs Plan, the actuals will show a total figure and the plan will show detail, creating the need for an external and manual reconciliation
  • There is no multi-currency available
  • Scenario analysis can be difficult to do quickly. For example, if I want to see the plan with planned hires and without planned hires, then I would need to create two separate plans, individually select and delete the planned hires in one plan and keep then in another plan, which is time-consuming
  • Using Google Sign-In causes the system to time-out frequently for me, so I get kicked out of the system and have to log back in. If I have multiple tabs of Jirav open, then re-logging in sometimes doesn't bring me back to where I was originally at.
  • You can export reports to Excel, but there are no formulas of the calculations, which makes it more difficult to understand how calculations are being performed unless you look in the browser and dig into the calculations. This also might make it more difficult if you decide to go to another software in the future since you may need to start from scratch in the next software
  • Seasonality has been difficult to model. For example, the way our model is set up, I can use an assumption for Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4. However, if I update Q3 for this year, then it also updates Q3 of all subsequent years, which I don't want. A more complex model and additional maintenance would be needed to accomplish more accurate seasonality planning
Read full review
Synoptix
  • It has a poor install procedure which is not standard. It almost requires copying folders from an existing computer to the new install.
  • The update process is less than desirable. It seems like Compusoft needs to do a better job of testing before releasing updates.
  • The interface is a bit archaic. It looks more like a program from 20 years ago than one used today.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Jirav
No answers on this topic
Synoptix
There is no question that we will continue to use this product for as long as it's available
Read full review
Usability
Jirav
No answers on this topic
Synoptix
It didn't take long to learn how it works and has always been easy to navigate and accomplish all that we have needed. Whenever there have been any issues Synopotix has been great to address them in a timely manner and have always been able to resolve the issues we have had
Read full review
Support Rating
Jirav
No answers on this topic
Synoptix
Support does not know much about software solutions. As an example, I have struggled for weeks just to set up LDAP that should be fairly simple.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Jirav
No answers on this topic
Synoptix
Good guidance of what steps will halppen.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Jirav
Fathom was the cheapest and most basic as an add-on directly to QuickBooks Online Plus, but you lose functionality with Fathom if you use QuickBooks Online Advanced (QBOA). The main loss of functionality for me was the lack of multiple department reporting, which was absolutely necessary for my analysis. Jirav was half the price of Moscaic.tech, but I've heard Mosaic has standard metrics for the SaaS-industry, which is appealing after going through the tedious process of setting up metrics in Jirav. QBOA has additional reporting than QBO Plus, but not enough robust features for planning and modeling. PlaceCPM is Salesforce-based and a I felt having a strong Salesforce admin that can great reports made their unnecessary, and I feel like most of the time you need a Salesforce admin just to run Salesforce. Cube, Vena and OnPlan are spreadsheet-based, but I don't want to use spreadsheets. Prophix, Board and Anaplan seem outdated. Workday was more than what I needed
Read full review
Synoptix
Synoptix is more oriented to users as their own developers. You do not need to understand any sort of coding or languages. If you are working in financials you just need to know your trial balance. The menus and programing are so user friendly the programming is "kinda obvious"
Read full review
Return on Investment
Jirav
  • 1-3 day shortening of post-month end close analysis from integration with our accounting software
  • Elimination of several manual Excels related to headcount variance, salary variance, and planning
Read full review
Synoptix
  • As a reporting tool it has allowed us to make fact based decisions. We have a significant annual cost with relation to our legacy system and Synoptix provides us with the best tool to mine the data that resides in our legacy system.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Jirav Screenshots

Screenshot of Dynamic dashboards can be sharedScreenshot of Customizable reporting for leadership teams, investors, and stakeholdersScreenshot of Scenario planningScreenshot of Customizable driversScreenshot of Out of the box integrations with accounting, payroll and sales data