LiquidPlanner vs. Structure by Tempo
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LiquidPlanner | Score8.3 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | LiquidPlanner is a cloud based predictive project management solution. Some key features include: Dynamic Timeline View, Workload View, and Real-Time Activity Stream. | $0 per month per user |
Structure by Tempo | N/A | N/A | Structure for Jira, based on technology acquired by Tempo with ALM Works, is a ppm tool that enables users to visualize multiple Jira projects, programs, and portfolios in one place, so as to align execution with strategy. Structure’s hierarchies and spreadsheet-like views help users control their entire portfolio. It can be used for essential tasks across Jira teams and projects, such as project planning, reporting, sprint planning, and release management. | $10 per month per user |
| LiquidPlanner | Structure by Tempo | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| LiquidPlanner | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
86% Would buy again 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
80% Implementation went as expected 4 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| LiquidPlanner | Structure by Tempo | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Professional Services Automation |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LiquidPlanner | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Any.do Score8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | KanbanFlow Score7.3 out of 10 | Microsoft Project Server Score5.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Microsoft To Do Score8 out of 10 | Planview PPM Pro Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| LiquidPlanner | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.5 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 4.4 | - |
| Usability | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | - |
| LiquidPlanner | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | LiquidPlanner Screenshots |







