TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

LoadComplete vs. OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs. Tricentis Tosca

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Tricentis Tosca

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Tricentis

Connect with Tricentis

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Tricentis so that Tricentis and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    LoadComplete

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ASmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.

    $287

    one-time fee

    LoadRunner Professional

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AA solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A

    Tricentis Tosca

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ATricentis Tosca provides an approach to test automation that is AI-powered, codeless, and end-to-end so it can test everything in a complex IT landscape, to ensure business processes work flawlessly no matter where changes occurs. Its 160+ technology support helps users test everything at the UI, API and data layer, including virtually any enterprise, custom, homegrown and mobile application. With its model-based approach, Tosca enables business, QA and IT teams to…N/A
    Pricing
    LoadCompleteLoadRunner ProfessionalTricentis Tosca
    Editions & Modules
    Subscription Starter
    $239
    per month 100 virtual users
    On-demand Starter
    $287
    one-time fee 100 virtual users
    Subscription Pro
    $699
    per month 1000 virtual users
    On-demand Pro
    $887
    one-time fee 1000 virtual users
    Subscription Premium
    $899
    per month 2500 virtual users
    On-demand Premium
    $1,139
    one-time fee 2500 virtual users
    Enterprise
    Let's chat
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    LoadCompleteLoadRunner ProfessionalTricentis Tosca
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsOn-demand plans contain a $4.99 monthly maintenance fee.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    LoadCompleteLoadRunner ProfessionalTricentis Tosca
    Considered Multiple Products
    SmartBear
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Because of it's great support for cross browser/cross device and devops, this really makes the cut against it's peers.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Would buy again
    39 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    34 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    41 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    29 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    35 Answers
    Features
    LoadCompleteLoadRunner ProfessionalTricentis Tosca
    Load Testing
    Comparison of Load Testing features of LoadComplete and OpenText LoadRunner Professional and Tricentis Tosca
    Feature
    LoadComplete
    8.8
    4 Ratings
    3% above category average
    OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    8.4
    6 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Tricentis Tosca
    -
    Ratings
    End to end performance management8.84 Ratings9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrated performance data9.93 Ratings10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility7.84 Ratings9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Real time monitoring7.94 Ratings6.15 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated anomaly detection9.83 Ratings8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of LoadComplete and OpenText LoadRunner Professional and Tricentis Tosca
    Feature
    LoadComplete
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Tricentis Tosca
    7.5
    29 Ratings
    12% below category average
    Record and Automate00 Ratings00 Ratings7.728 Ratings
    Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.627 Ratings
    Mobile Testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.024 Ratings
    Test Scheduling00 Ratings00 Ratings8.330 Ratings
    Test Management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.526 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.426 Ratings
    Integrated Version Control00 Ratings00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Parallel Testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.628 Ratings
    Object Recognition00 Ratings00 Ratings8.828 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings00 Ratings8.328 Ratings
    Real Device Testing00 Ratings00 Ratings7.418 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings6.729 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    LoadCompleteLoadRunner ProfessionalTricentis Tosca
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    LoadCompleteLoadRunner ProfessionalTricentis Tosca
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    8.9
    (45 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.5
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (39 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    LoadCompleteLoadRunner ProfessionalTricentis Tosca
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SmartBear
    I think that LoadComplete is adequate when you have Testcomplete. If LoadComplete is not paired with Testcomplete then there would be a bit of a learning curve. People who are already using Testcomplete will find it easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has a lot to improve and support customization to suit our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Micro Focus LoadRunner and its suite of tools, specifically VuGen works wonderfully for us for all web, http/https and web service calls. We've been able to build tests for near any scenario we need with relative ease. As long as we have crafted up requirements for our scenarios / scripts to managed scope, we've had high success working with scripting and data driving. Our main tests are web service calls - typically chained together to form a full scenario with transactions measuring the journey or a similar (measure along the way) journey through a browser. For web services we will use VuGen and browser we've shifted to Tru Client I have had little-to-no experience scripting against a thick client where a ui-driven test would be required. I know its possible but quite costly due to the need to run the actual desktop client to drive tests. We've been fortunate enough to leverage http calls to represent client traffic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    I still love to test some desktop applications as well as API's with Tosca. For web applications Tosca is OK but there are better alternatives. As a user, Tosca is really great to work with as you can set up a clean project quite fast. It is also quite easy to make a mess as a non-experienced user, using configurations (but in the wrong way), using TCD (but in the wrong way). It would help if there was more focus on generic test automation fundamentals, many more clear examples and instead of just mentioning the best practices, make users really understand the best practices so they know how and when to (not) apply them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    SmartBear
    • Easy and handy UI options to select
    • Good support from documentation
    • Eye-catching results
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
    • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
    • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Ease of maintenance with the help of Reusable TestStep Blocks (Libraries)
    • Flexible and scalable execution infrastructure to support organizations to ramp up or ramp down the resources based on the requirement.
    • Various certification courses available on Tricentis Academy to enable users to learn all the available products based on the role desired by the user.
    • Creation of Execution packs based on the type of testing cycle
    • AI enabled test case designing with features like test case generation using plain text prompts.
    • With the help of co pilot, we can now auto generate complex TQL.
    • Co pilot will summarize what a given test cases will do when executed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    SmartBear
    • Some graphs remain empty, I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data.
    • Allow user to customize the graph.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
    • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
    • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
    • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Documentation - struggled multiple times with features not explained very well, or not explained at all
    • The only support is on Tricentis Forums, where, sometimes, based on 'luck' - you will open a support case, and wait few days until you get the chance to speak with someone from Tricentis and show case your issue
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    SmartBear
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    Tricentis Tosca has consistently delivered value through its model‑based, low‑code automation, strong SAP ECC/S/4HANA and Fiori support, and the ability to reuse test assets across regression, upgrades, and transformation projects. Its coverage across SAP, Web, APIs, and desktop within a single platform reduces tool sprawl and maintenance effort, while features like risk‑based testing, CI/CD integration, and business‑readable tests align well with our quality and release goals
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    SmartBear
    Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    Tricentis Tosca supports a large number of technologies and applications. it is easier to start and progress on test automation using Tosca. It is a codeless tool which makes it easier to learn for even a entry level engineer.The modular approach makes it easier to create test cases and maintain them for future enhancements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    SmartBear
    Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    Tricentis team was very supportive. Support is expensive but they helped us at many level. Setting up timeline, implementation, precise questions on automation challenges. We had an account manager and technical people we could as to talk to. Support was generally timely and helping. They often proposed to come on site to help us which would cost more but could be helpful
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    SmartBear
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    It would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    SmartBear
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    okIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    SmartBear
    JMeter is a more flexible tool because it gives the possibility to write scripts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    Tricentis Tosca is codeless and therefore easier to use. It's a great tool for people that would start doing automation and have no coding background. It seems like it has the same capabilities as other test automation suites but I felt it lacked a bit of capabilities on the test management suite such as defects test suites organizations etc
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    SmartBear
    • This tool always yields eye-catching results. It has good support from the documentation. Also, it generates detailed reports which is a very good thing.
    • There is also a record and play feature in LoadComplete which means all applications can be recorded like Applications Servers’ Metric and so on.
    • This tool has a good reporting and record playback due to which I will recommend it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
    • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • It really had a very good impact on our ROI. We were able to automate most of the apps and layers with in it and get a very short execution time which led to increased releases with in short span of time.
    • Time to market really improved and efficiency of developing scripts was not too bad.
    • With built in test dashboards, it was easy to pull metrics and share the insights with management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tricentis Tosca Screenshots

    Screenshot of where no-code, model-based test automation separates the technical information of an application into reusable, no-code modules that can be updated as applications change, which auto-updates test cases.Screenshot of a test case design for risk optimization - this displays a flexible testing model that enables fast, easy test case creation and maintenance and reduces risk in app releases.Screenshot of requirements coverage for risk optimization - this enables users to prioritize requirements by business risk/ impact, understand what is needed to test, and gain business insight on defects to ensure smarter and faster release decisions.Screenshot of Vision AI - AI powered test automation using patented neural network technology to deliver resilient UI automation. Includes self-healing AI capabilities.Screenshot of service virtualization, which enables users to build realistic, simulated services in minutes to remove bottlenecks and run end-to-end tests faster in the software development lifecycle.Screenshot of test data management. This offers test data when it is needed and helps keep track of the data as it gets consumed across end-to-end business processes.