Looker vs. PingPlotter
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Looker | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Looker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems. | N/A |
PingPlotter | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | PingPlotter is a graphical traceroute and ping tool that visualizes network performance in a way that makes identifying the source of problems quicker and easier for everyone from online gamers and video streamers to VoIP admins and IT pros. Features for remote deployment, network monitoring, scripting, and a web interface are included along with several additional capabilities. | $0 per user |
| Looker | PingPlotter | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Must contact sales team for pricing. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Looker | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 85 Answers | 100% Would buy again 33 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
99% Delivers good value for the price 75 Answers | 96% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 87 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 33 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 55 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 21 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 69 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 31 Answers | |
| Looker | PingPlotter | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BI Standard Reporting |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Ad-hoc Reporting |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Report Output and Scheduling |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Data Discovery and Visualization |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Access Control and Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Mobile Capabilities |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Network Performance Monitoring |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Looker | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Cyfe Score4 out of 10 | Auvik Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense) Score8.1 out of 10 | Paessler PRTG Score8.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Sisense Score6.9 out of 10 | Nmap Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Looker | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 9.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.2 | - |
| Usability | 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Availability | 10.0 | - |
| Performance | 6.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Configurability | 10.0 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 10.0 | - |
| Data Sharing and Collaboration | 8.5 | - |
| Data Sources | 7.3 | - |
| Ease of integration | 10.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 | - |
| Professional Services | 10.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 10.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 10.0 | - |
| Looker | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Looker Screenshots | PingPlotter Screenshots |










