Mattermost vs. Thomson Reuters HighQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mattermost
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Mattermost from the company of the same name in Palo Alto is a messaging, collaboration and communication platform providing high security and compliance for the businesses that need it.
$0
per month per user
HighQ
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
HighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A
Pricing
MattermostThomson Reuters HighQ
Editions & Modules
Free Self-Hosted
$0
per month per user
Professional
$10
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Us
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MattermostHighQ
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MattermostThomson Reuters HighQ
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
MattermostThomson Reuters HighQ
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Mattermost
8.3
29 Ratings
6% above category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.2
2 Ratings
4% above category average
Task Management7.318 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.310 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling8.410 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.413 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Mobile Access8.528 Ratings9.32 Ratings
Search9.225 Ratings9.62 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.912 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Mattermost
8.9
31 Ratings
11% above category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.6
2 Ratings
7% above category average
Chat9.831 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Notifications8.531 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Discussions9.429 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Surveys9.118 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase8.617 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting8.69 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts8.613 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook8.29 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Mattermost
8.9
29 Ratings
9% above category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
9.4
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Versioning8.912 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Video files9.123 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Audio files9.123 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Document collaboration8.419 Ratings9.22 Ratings
Access control9.023 Ratings9.22 Ratings
Advanced security features8.520 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive8.613 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync9.317 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MattermostThomson Reuters HighQ
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.7 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MattermostThomson Reuters HighQ
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(32 ratings)
9.2
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.8
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(9 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(19 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MattermostThomson Reuters HighQ
Likelihood to Recommend
Mattermost
Mattermost is definitely appropriate for a growing company with team members spread out across the u.s. and Canada. It’s given me the ability to have access to anyone with the information I need or the ability to develop friendships, working relationships with people I otherwise wouldn’t have access to
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
Read full review
Pros
Mattermost
  • We collaborate as a team with great efficiency and ease, we solve any problem or need together through the Mattermost chat.
  • Communication is made regardless of the distance where my colleagues are, it is very fast and does not slow down the progress of our work.
  • We can create many channels and be more efficient, we enhance the internal productivity of each department.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
  • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
  • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
Read full review
Cons
Mattermost
  • Some of the features in paid plans could be free, however, they have much offered in free plan (self-hosted)
  • The Desktop App we use on windows has some bugs, like when Mattermost is down and comes back up, the app needs restart
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Mattermost
Mattermost has been an excellent tool for our business, allowing for a very cost-effective means of communicating, collaborating, and sharing project and business documentation and resources. The free community edition allows for simple installation on existing cloud server resources which results in significantly lower recurring costs compared to the competition
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Usability
Mattermost
It's an extremely easy to use software, and I would recommend it to every company that is growing. I think they could improve their notification system, as it gets a little spammy sometimes and important notifications get lost. Also needs to improve the number of private chats that you are allowed to create.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Mattermost
We have not had to contact support for Mattermost ever. All that we have needed has been available in the documentation or website. One of our DevOps team members set it up in a couple of hours. The whole team was using Mattermost that same day. No support needed.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Mattermost
This went as expected. No surprises or major hurdles.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Mattermost
Before Mattermost, we used Stride first, and then Slack as our communication platform. Stride got discontinued so it is not comparable, but Slack got very costly for us, with basically the same features as Mattermost - a matter of fact, the "reply" feature is surprisingly non-existent on Slack (you can reply by opening a different thread, but that is hard to follow in most cases), and not only exists in Mattermost but very straightforward. We have considered using Discord too, but then chose Mattermost for its open-source nature, and the possibility of running our very own self-hosted servers, with total control.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Mattermost
  • Very high performing data migration functions and easy to navigate.
  • Creating analytics on multiple big data is a very simple and reliable report with multiple benefits.
  • Collaboration is effective, and easy project documentation.
  • Lead generation is excellent and easy on access control management.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
  • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
  • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Mattermost Screenshots

Screenshot of Channels: All team communications in one place.Screenshot of Playbooks: Orchestrates work across tools and teams.Screenshot of Boards: Project planning and milestones.Screenshot of Connections: Unites the entire technology stack through a single point of collaboration.