TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Zelta

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AZelta is a cloud-based unified clinical data management and acquisition platform with customizable modules, that can be tailored to the meet the needs of clinical trials and accelerate outcomes.N/A

    SugarSync

    Score3.6 out of 10
    N/ASugarSync is a cloud storage and backup solution designed for small businesses.

    $7.50

    per month

    Pricing
    ZeltaSugarSync
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    100 GB
    $7.49
    per month
    250 GB
    $9.99
    per month
    500 GB
    $18.95
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ZeltaSugarSync
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsSubscription - For larger organizations and those who need a predictable budget. Most modules included without incurring additional fees. Eligible for volume discounts. Pay per use - For organizations that need flexibility without a long term contractual commitment. Transparent a la carte pricing, no minimums. Fees start when trial goes live.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ZeltaSugarSync
    Considered Both Products
    Merative
    No answer on this topic
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    16 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    19 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    ZeltaSugarSync
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Zelta and SugarSync
    Feature
    Zelta
    -
    Ratings
    SugarSync
    9.4
    8 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Versioning00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Video files00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Audio files00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Document collaboration00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    Access control00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    File search00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Device sync00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    Cloud Storage Security & Administration
    Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Zelta and SugarSync
    Feature
    Zelta
    -
    Ratings
    SugarSync
    9.7
    8 Ratings
    11% above category average
    User and role management00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    File organization00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Device management00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    Cloud Storage Platform
    Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Zelta and SugarSync
    Feature
    Zelta
    -
    Ratings
    SugarSync
    10.0
    8 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Performance00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    Reliability00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    Storage Reports00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ZeltaSugarSync
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    IDrive Online Backup and Object Storage e2
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Apple iCloud
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    ownCloud
    Score9.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ZeltaSugarSync
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (20 ratings)
    10.0
    (10 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (19 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (20 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ZeltaSugarSync
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Merative
    Zelta is a good tool for companies currently utilizing multiple software platforms to create and monitor clinical trial information. Due to the price, it is best suited for large pharmaceutical manufacturers with active pipelines and high R&D spend. Zelta's value is more limited to smaller, more focused companies.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    When doing daily jobs, if you’re sharing large files, I think Dropbox works a lot better but if you have a system where you’re working within that system and you want to be able to work with that system and have certain folders that you have access to all the time then SugarSync might be just the ticket.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Merative
    • It is highly customizable and easy to program.
    • There is a wide variety of data that can be collected from IRB/site information to clinical data.
    • Zelta provides comprehensive edit language to program for accurate results.
    • Page dynamics are very useful when including or hiding certain data questions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • Sync files in any folder - rather than forcing you to store them in a certain place (Although this can be confusing too)
    • Works in the background - although this is true for all
    • You can share with others - including those who do not use SugarSync
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Merative
    • We cannot have multiple study accesses for a study in the studies supported by Zelta. eg. Coder and Data manager.
    • Though all the study-build related errors are flagged on the study-build page, some errors like incorrect dynamics applied, which eventually affects the subject PDF extraction, reports, etc.
    • When the study is imported from another Zelta studies, certain attributes remain running in the background even if it seems to be disabled.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • Can only think of one thing. I have helped others to get going with SugarSync and they if they have problems it is understanding the cloud.... So maybe (if it dosen't exist already) I would like to have a animation of the proces with "flying" folders between desktops, clouds etc. Otherwise SugarSync is just great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Merative
    We are satisfied from our experience with Zelta by Merative, the close collaboration we have with the Zelta team is also something we value. We plan to use Zelta for a long time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    1. Freemium model is the ideal marketing for an app like this. 2. Now their sync methods with Android are worse
    Read full review
    Usability
    Merative
    Zelta has many different functionalities as well as modules that can be used depending on what the sponsor wants. I like that they are optional so that when building a study, you can give the sponsor options if they want them or not. Many of the optional models I like to use (Training Tracking for example) as they make tracking Site training so much easier than sending training forms out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Merative
    available when needed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Merative
    some audit reports are difficult to download and take time subject pdf also takes some time to download
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Merative
    Our organization has been using both Zelta and in-house applications. The main considerations on which one to use for a particular study is time to get the databases running, cost, and ease of use. For some studies, the time and cost of using Zelta are negative factors, and an in-house system is selected.
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    Customer service is amazing, they are always fast to respond and very helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Merative
    very efficient self training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Merative
    again not sure about it, I wasn't part of our organization yet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Merative
    It was easier to understand the usability of the software [Zelta]. For our engineers [it] was easier to migrate our data, and fully set up everything. We found out that comparing other software[s], this one is safe, easy to use, has more functionalities, [and it's] easier to work with team members everywhere making clinical trials more efficient.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    SugarSync, like all solutions, has its place in the data storage stack within a company. The main reason SugarSync is better than the other solutions is that it enables me to leave my hard drive organized and keep my existing file trees. I don't have to constantly move or copy files to a specific folder if I want them backed up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Merative
    • Time savings regarding how long it takes to make an EDC Live.
    • Reduced EDC Go Live time by at least half (from 60 days to 30).
    • Was able to take an EDC live in 14 days on a few occasions.
    • Seamless RTSM IRT integration without adding time to Go Live.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • There were some opensource alternatives but we wanted something with better support which SugarSync offers.
    • We achieved faster project collaboration with SugarSync.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Zelta Screenshots

    Screenshot of the ePRO DiaryScreenshot of Local LabsScreenshot of Medical Coding with AIScreenshot of Site user data entryScreenshot of the Study Connect DashboardScreenshot of the Study Designer Logic Editor