Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
Workiva
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Workiva is a cloud platform supporting ESG protecting, designed to provide collaboration, data integration, and an audit trail. The platform helps mitigate risk, and improves productivity.
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Workiva
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Workiva
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Workiva
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Workiva
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
6.319 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
5.915 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.518 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
6.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
2.526 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
5.932 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.240 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
37% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Dashboards
3.529 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.239 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.539 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
40% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
6.445 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
5.936 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash management
6.436 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
5.741 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
4.531 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
8.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
4.628 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
2.919 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
3.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
3.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
7.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
4.721 Ratings
00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
3.918 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
4.513 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
4.726 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
2.916 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
4.117 Ratings
00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
3.814 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.219 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.6
26 Ratings
46% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
6.224 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
1.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
4.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing module
4.615 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Pricing
3.618 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
3.621 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
1.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
5.225 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
5.39 Ratings
00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
3.812 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution
3.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Workiva
7.9
6 Ratings
5% above category average
Common repository of GRC items
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Risk management
00 Ratings
7.75 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Wdesk is best suited for companies with demanding SEC filings and documents, with multiple revisions due to auditor/counsel review, and where financial reporting is extremely manual. Wdesk really helps take out the potential errors out of extremely manual processes, and helps automate regular financial reporting by allowing companies to link financial information and build customized flows of their information into financial statements and other documents (such as presentations or other internal reporting).
Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
The biggest strength of the program for our team is that multiple users can work in the document at the same time. Multiple users can be in the program updating financial statements, footnotes, MD&A - all without stepping on each other's toes.
Rolling forward the documents from one period to the next is pretty simple. Links to source documents are maintained and new ones can be added without much hassle.
Edits and changes can be made right up until the last minute before filing. There is no waiting period or pencils-down period unless we enforce one ourselves - the Financial Reporting team is in control of the timing of our filings.
With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Overall it's a good-to-go product because of its features. It's easy to set up, meets requirements, has quality support, etc. So far, it has been working quite well for me, and I wish to continue using it for as long as it meets my requirements.
Workiva's technical support is impeccable and undoubtedly one of the best. The times we needed them, they were super quick and willing to help. It works 24 hours a day, and there will always be someone to help with doubts or technical problems regarding the tool.
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
We moved from a third party filer to doing it in house. Have seen demos of products like Active Disclosure, which has come a long way from the beta version I saw and but we are not too far gone with Wdesk for us to evaluate other products. When we first signed up with Webfilings, (former name of Workiva), there were no viable products in the market. I had seen an Oracle product and a beta version of Active Disclosure. It was not hard to see the ease and intuitive-screens, to guide one through the filing process. The excel-like spreadsheets were an added bonus.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
We spend less than we used to with a traditional printer.
We have been able to do turn-on-a-dime equity offerings with last minute changes and still file on time.
Inviting external legal into the platform has helped with communication but we actually suspect they spend MORE time (and billing) on our documents than they used to just simply because it's so easy to get at them anytime they want.