Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A
Sparkrock
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Sparkrock’s cloud-enabled solution helps organizations manage their finance and accounting, human resources and payroll, human services case management, and donor and fundraising activities. According to the vendor, key benefits and features include: Finance Management with capabilities to help organizations increase transparency and reduce risk. Workforce Management to help front-line employees deliver services to clients, with tools that help them to be…N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERPSparkrock
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERPSparkrock
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee$50,000 per installation
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERPSparkrock
Features
Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERPSparkrock
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
14% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
1 Ratings
30% above category average
Sparkrock
9.4
3 Ratings
24% above category average
Pay calculation9.62 Ratings10.01 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Direct deposit files9.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
21% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
2 Ratings
30% above category average
Sparkrock
10.0
2 Ratings
30% above category average
API for custom integration6.06 Ratings9.92 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Plug-ins6.04 Ratings10.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
4% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
5 Ratings
18% above category average
Sparkrock
9.5
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Single sign-on capability7.49 Ratings10.05 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Role-based user permissions10.09 Ratings10.05 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
8% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
4 Ratings
12% above category average
Sparkrock
9.0
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Dashboards8.06 Ratings7.03 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Standard reports8.010 Ratings9.04 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Custom reports8.010 Ratings9.04 Ratings9.03 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.8
3 Ratings
14% above category average
Sparkrock
8.8
5 Ratings
14% above category average
Accounts payable6.011 Ratings7.03 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.08 Ratings7.03 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.02 Ratings7.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.63 Ratings7.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations3.04 Ratings7.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.03 Ratings7.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.03 Ratings8.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.5
5 Ratings
18% above category average
Sparkrock
9.3
2 Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking5.06 Ratings10.05 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Location management6.03 Ratings10.04 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings8.05 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
23% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
7.9
5 Ratings
1% above category average
Sparkrock
-
Ratings
Pricing6.03 Ratings4.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry3.04 Ratings8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.02 Ratings9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.03 Ratings8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
27% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.0
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Sparkrock
9.6
1 Ratings
25% above category average
Billing Management6.02 Ratings8.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.33 Ratings8.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.32 Ratings8.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Period Close6.04 Ratings8.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Sparkrock
9.4
1 Ratings
21% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting7.33 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Project Costing6.33 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Cost Capture2.12 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
16% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Sparkrock
9.3
1 Ratings
23% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management6.01 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
21% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.8
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Sparkrock
-
Ratings
Production Management6.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Process Design00 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
18% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.8
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Sparkrock
9.3
1 Ratings
26% above category average
Inventory Planning6.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.02 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings8.02 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
1 Ratings
25% above category average
Sparkrock
9.6
1 Ratings
31% above category average
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings9.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
1 Ratings
27% above category average
Sparkrock
-
Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.0
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Sparkrock
-
Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERPSparkrock
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERPSparkrock
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(18 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
9.0
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.4
(8 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
3.0
(7 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
9.9
(2 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.5
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
1.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
1.4
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics SLQAD Adaptive ERPSparkrock
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
Read full review
QAD
If you're setting up operations where you have to manage manufacturing builds from raw components to finished goods, I would recommend QAD. It's nice to have subassemblies part numbers for your builds and enter in the number of accepted quantities and rejects. QAD is very helpful if you have a lot of parts floating around. I would not buy QAD if you only have to manage less than ~20 parts... just use Excel.
Read full review
Sparkrock
For all companies that want to improve the performance of their employees and increase productivity, this software helps all daily business tasks to be executed on time efficiently and smoothly. A very useful program that's why we don't stop using it.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
  • Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
  • A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
  • Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
  • Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
  • Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
Read full review
QAD
  • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
  • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
  • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
Read full review
Sparkrock
  • Data collection - the system is robust and we can tailor it to collect the information we need.
  • Easily configurable - the system is easy to configure to meet our specific business needs.
  • Reporting and data extraction - the system allows for easy access to information that helps inform business decisions.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
  • I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
  • Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
Read full review
QAD
  • The layout is old fashion. Can be more modern.
  • QAD Adaptive ERP has alot of functions that can be overwhelming to new users
Read full review
Sparkrock
  • Many of the improvements are being met with each upgrade. Altus Dynamics has an idea portal that customers can add ideas to and vote on other customer ideas. This means that most issues that come up are resolved with each new upgrade.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
Read full review
QAD
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
Read full review
Sparkrock
We are already scheduled for our upgrade to NAV 2016 beginning in May 2016.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
Read full review
QAD
Easy to use, zero or minimum cost to maintain the database (DBA etc) , no issue with OS ( Linux), stable database
Read full review
Sparkrock
Complete workflow management to keep up to date and orderly the daily activities of employees. Allows for seamless cash flow, invoicing, general ledger, payroll, and inventory.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
Read full review
QAD
No answers on this topic
Sparkrock
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
Read full review
QAD
I haven't contacted support for QAD yet.
Read full review
Sparkrock
Complete tracking of employee performance, hours worked, attendance and absences, vacations, and overtime.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
Read full review
QAD
No answers on this topic
Sparkrock
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
Read full review
QAD
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
Read full review
Sparkrock
  • Real-time data that is available at our fingertips
  • Flexibility of the system to address changing needs over time
  • Elimination of the huge administrative burdens that we were experiencing as a result of the previous system due to lack of integration
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
Read full review
QAD
No answers on this topic
Sparkrock
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • More time is spent on manipulating reports which can and should be automated.
  • Lack of electronic invoicing process and other green technology features creates more cost on printing and storage costs.
  • The lack of a user friendly interface requires more training and a bigger learning curve for staff.
Read full review
QAD
  • It help us to reduce the inventories (FG and RAW)
  • It reduce the time to adjust to the constantly changing international customs laws
Read full review
Sparkrock
  • As a technician it's hard for me to say what effect the ROI has had on our organization, however our finance team seems satisfied on it. We look forward to deploying the staff dashboards for better financial tracking throughout our whole organization.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Sparkrock Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of