Microsoft Teams Rooms vs. Whereby

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
A solution to turn any space into a meeting room designed for inclusive collaboration, where everyone can fully participate.
$40
per month (annual subscription) per room
Whereby
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Norwegian company appear.in offers their flagship video conferencing platform to small teams, both in a free edition hosting up to 4 guests simultaneously in a session or a paid edition that supports up to 12 simultaneous meeting guests, among other features.
$0
per user
Pricing
Microsoft Teams RoomsWhereby
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
per user
Pro
$9.99
per user
Business
$59.99 and up
per user/room
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Teams RoomsWhereby
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Teams RoomsWhereby
Features
Microsoft Teams RoomsWhereby
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
7.9
6 Ratings
0% below category average
Whereby
7.8
14 Ratings
2% below category average
High quality audio8.76 Ratings9.014 Ratings
High quality video8.26 Ratings9.014 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements7.05 Ratings8.012 Ratings
Mobile support7.85 Ratings5.011 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.2
6 Ratings
4% above category average
Whereby
8.0
13 Ratings
1% above category average
Desktop sharing8.56 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Whiteboards7.86 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.4
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Whereby
9.4
13 Ratings
14% above category average
Calendar integration8.76 Ratings9.94 Ratings
Meeting initiation8.65 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Integrates with social media8.03 Ratings9.72 Ratings
Record meetings / events8.76 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Slideshows8.26 Ratings9.35 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.3
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Whereby
8.3
9 Ratings
3% above category average
Live chat8.06 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Audience polling8.36 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Q&A8.56 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.4
6 Ratings
5% above category average
Whereby
6.9
11 Ratings
15% below category average
User authentication9.26 Ratings8.86 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions8.26 Ratings5.09 Ratings
Confidential attendee list8.04 Ratings7.04 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.7
6 Ratings
14% above category average
Whereby
-
Ratings
Video conferencing8.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio conferencing8.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Video screen sharing8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant messaging8.85 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Teams RoomsWhereby
Small Businesses
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.4 out of 10
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 9.7 out of 10
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.5 out of 10
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Teams RoomsWhereby
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(6 ratings)
9.0
(15 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(6 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.1
(9 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Teams RoomsWhereby
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
We use Microsoft Teams Rooms across all of our main conference suites. This ensure our staff have consistent meeting experiences in out part of the education sector - meetings generally become hybrid fairly frequently and can even extend to pupils or staff working from home. We did try some of the poly equipment in a classroom environment but due to noise levels and the amount of pupils and staff it quickly became a non starter. We were advised to stick with participant numbers aligned to our purchased hardware before we tried this.
Read full review
Whereby
If you cannot use another more common solution on the market or are looking for an alternative to the known solutions, it is a great alternative. If you have other tools already, and just want to test [them], that's fine, but I think the better-known ones have a better chance of using, knowing, and the learning curve will be shorter.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Camera view selection is a nice feature which allows remote users to choose the camera feedback to select for better experience.
  • Live reactions like hand claps, thumbs up, raised hands,etc can be used to indicate to presenters that a meeting attendee has a question. This is cool.
  • We can connect our laptop seamlessly to the Microsoft Teams Rooms to share our content or presentation which makes things very simple.
Read full review
Whereby
  • Easy to use: The app is very, very easy to use. Literally just create a chat room (input a name) and access it to chat.
  • Call/video quality: I've experienced better call quality on appear.in than in almost all other chat and video conferencing services out there.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Improve AI Camera to frame participants in large rooms
  • no translation captions in real team for multilingual teams
  • new elements to introduce quizzes and help with engagement
Read full review
Whereby
  • The paid version may have dial-in. But I have always used the free version. Dial-in is typically required for an "official" multi-purpose teleconference platform.
  • I did have some trouble with larger groups (5+) when it was Appear.in but almost always use it for small 1-on-1 or 3 person meetings.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Whereby
We are using a larger tool suite that already includes video conferencing instead of our older approach of using different apps from different vendors. appear.in has a simple but great set of features but its pricing scheme is not as scalable as we really need in a 500+ employee company.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams Rooms has been very useful for our small business. As mentioned, it has allowed us to connect with our team more regularly, share important information, and keep productivity up by allowing our team to get on remotely and not have to commute to be together in person.
Read full review
Whereby
Very easy to use, technical and non-technical colleagues have used it with no instructions needed. That says all about the app and services.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Whereby
Never had to contact support, so we cannot give a rating for their overall support. When we noticed the audio was not always great quality, we simply educated our users to mute the mic and use the in-room conference phone which is connected via a dedicated VOIP link and had much better voice quality. The video performance varied by locations network speed and found it got much worse when the room size increased to over 4 connections.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Whereby
After a recommendation from a partner, as the system is very easy to use, we simply start.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I consider MTR better because it first allows integration with all the Microsoft apps and is more cost-effective, considering all the included services such as the Office app, Cloud Storage, and email.
Read full review
Whereby
I find Zoom more complicated to use and harder to use because a lot of people do not like having to download things to their computers or devices and Whereby is so easy to get connected with . I like that Zoom offers larger rooms, but at this point the cost is not worth the extra expense.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Increase in Staff confidence to use meeting equipment
  • less "device failures" during meetings
  • More and more staff have reduced the need to travel to each of our sites for a meeting.
Read full review
Whereby
  • In general, any sort of online collaborations saves a lot on your budget. The meetings are rather more on time and can be efficient and short.
  • Easy to drop-by and have a small talk with clients/teammates within COVID era.
  • The URL makes you look fancy instead of a random hash.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Whereby Screenshots

Screenshot of Easy video meetings in your browser. No downloads, no login.Screenshot of Up to 50 participants in Townhall rooms.Screenshot of Record, save, and share meetings.