A solution to turn any space into a meeting room designed for inclusive collaboration, where everyone can fully participate.
$40
per month (annual subscription) per room
Whereby
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Norwegian company appear.in offers their flagship video conferencing platform to small teams, both in a free edition hosting up to 4 guests simultaneously in a session or a paid edition that supports up to 12 simultaneous meeting guests, among other features.
$0
per user
Pricing
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Whereby
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
per user
Pro
$9.99
per user
Business
$59.99 and up
per user/room
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Whereby
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Whereby
Features
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Whereby
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
7.9
6 Ratings
0% below category average
Whereby
7.8
14 Ratings
2% below category average
High quality audio
8.76 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
High quality video
8.26 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements
7.05 Ratings
8.012 Ratings
Mobile support
7.85 Ratings
5.011 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.2
6 Ratings
4% above category average
Whereby
8.0
13 Ratings
1% above category average
Desktop sharing
8.56 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Whiteboards
7.86 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.4
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Whereby
9.4
13 Ratings
14% above category average
Calendar integration
8.76 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Meeting initiation
8.65 Ratings
9.010 Ratings
Integrates with social media
8.03 Ratings
9.72 Ratings
Record meetings / events
8.76 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Slideshows
8.26 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.3
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Whereby
8.3
9 Ratings
3% above category average
Live chat
8.06 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Audience polling
8.36 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Q&A
8.56 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams Rooms
8.4
6 Ratings
5% above category average
Whereby
6.9
11 Ratings
15% below category average
User authentication
9.26 Ratings
8.86 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions
8.26 Ratings
5.09 Ratings
Confidential attendee list
8.04 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
We use Microsoft Teams Rooms across all of our main conference suites. This ensure our staff have consistent meeting experiences in out part of the education sector - meetings generally become hybrid fairly frequently and can even extend to pupils or staff working from home. We did try some of the poly equipment in a classroom environment but due to noise levels and the amount of pupils and staff it quickly became a non starter. We were advised to stick with participant numbers aligned to our purchased hardware before we tried this.
If you cannot use another more common solution on the market or are looking for an alternative to the known solutions, it is a great alternative. If you have other tools already, and just want to test [them], that's fine, but I think the better-known ones have a better chance of using, knowing, and the learning curve will be shorter.
Camera view selection is a nice feature which allows remote users to choose the camera feedback to select for better experience.
Live reactions like hand claps, thumbs up, raised hands,etc can be used to indicate to presenters that a meeting attendee has a question. This is cool.
We can connect our laptop seamlessly to the Microsoft Teams Rooms to share our content or presentation which makes things very simple.
The paid version may have dial-in. But I have always used the free version. Dial-in is typically required for an "official" multi-purpose teleconference platform.
I did have some trouble with larger groups (5+) when it was Appear.in but almost always use it for small 1-on-1 or 3 person meetings.
We are using a larger tool suite that already includes video conferencing instead of our older approach of using different apps from different vendors. appear.in has a simple but great set of features but its pricing scheme is not as scalable as we really need in a 500+ employee company.
Microsoft Teams Rooms has been very useful for our small business. As mentioned, it has allowed us to connect with our team more regularly, share important information, and keep productivity up by allowing our team to get on remotely and not have to commute to be together in person.
Never had to contact support, so we cannot give a rating for their overall support. When we noticed the audio was not always great quality, we simply educated our users to mute the mic and use the in-room conference phone which is connected via a dedicated VOIP link and had much better voice quality. The video performance varied by locations network speed and found it got much worse when the room size increased to over 4 connections.
I consider MTR better because it first allows integration with all the Microsoft apps and is more cost-effective, considering all the included services such as the Office app, Cloud Storage, and email.
I find Zoom more complicated to use and harder to use because a lot of people do not like having to download things to their computers or devices and Whereby is so easy to get connected with . I like that Zoom offers larger rooms, but at this point the cost is not worth the extra expense.