NICE CXone Mpower is a cloud-based contact center platform that manages customer interactions across multiple communication channels. It includes features such as automatic call distribution (ACD), interactive voice response (IVR), omnichannel routing, workforce optimization, feedback management, and interaction analytics.
$71
per month per user
OpenText Magellan
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
N/A
Pricing
NICE CXone Mpower
OpenText Magellan
Editions & Modules
CXone Mpower Digital Agent
$71
per month per user
CXone Mpower Voice Agent
$94
per month per user
CXone Mpower Omnichannel Agent
$110
per month per user
CXone Mpower Essential Suite
$135
per month per user
Cxone Mpower Core Suite
$169
per month per user
CXone Mpower Complete Suite
$209
per month per user
CXone Mpower Ultimate Suite
$249
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NICE CXone Mpower
OpenText Magellan
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NICE CXone Mpower
OpenText Magellan
Features
NICE CXone Mpower
OpenText Magellan
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
NICE CXone Mpower
9.2
581 Ratings
10% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Agent dashboard
9.5559 Ratings
00 Ratings
Validate callers
9.4471 Ratings
00 Ratings
Outbound response
9.6490 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call forwarding
9.3443 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click-to-call (CTC)
8.9403 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warm transfer
9.7531 Ratings
00 Ratings
Predictive dialing
9.2317 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive voice response
9.7376 Ratings
00 Ratings
REST APIs
8.5301 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call scripts
8.5322 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call tracking
9.3510 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multichannel integration
9.4364 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM software integration
9.1365 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
NICE CXone Mpower
9.1
556 Ratings
11% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Inbound call routing
9.0511 Ratings
00 Ratings
Omnichannel inbound routing
8.8373 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recording
9.4495 Ratings
00 Ratings
Quality management
9.0480 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call analytics
8.6486 Ratings
00 Ratings
Historical reporting
9.3479 Ratings
00 Ratings
Live reporting
9.2465 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer surveys
8.7299 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics
9.6319 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
NICE CXone Mpower
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
NICE CXone Mpower
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
3% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
NICE CXone Mpower
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
0% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
NICE CXone Mpower offers a great suite of products and tools appropriate for contact centers. It is a one stop shop for all of the monitoring, scheduling, reporting, and quality tools a large or small contact center may need. It is very feature rich and has many components, some of which we haven't even grown to adopt yet but may in the near future.
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
There can be changes in interface of the app, however it's still very good
I would appreciete detailed web page with all necessary information, but when I need anything, the customer support is very quick and provide all the information
Nice made it possible for employees to work from anywhere with access to the internet, it made it possible to extract data from contacts in a very thorough way. In addition, the meticaes can be fully customized and the day-to-day monitoring of the operation is more visible.With nice, contacts with clients abroad became easier.
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
The lack of written SOPs makes some features (WFM / Performance management) very difficult to use. The training provided by NICE is extensive, but it's hard to remember everything shared in the hour. We spend so much time on the platform just trying to figure out how to use the features; it would be much easier with written instructions and screenshots.
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
NICE inContact CXone is available when you need it. I have been using it for about a year and I have never suffered any issues that caused my not to have access to the product. If there are updates, they must be downloaded and install in the background because I do not see them
NICE inContact CXone performs very well even on old computers that are limited in resources. I use a older computer with limited memory and it seems to handle NICE inContact CXone very well in most cases. There will be times when it acts up for whatever reason bust over ninety percent of the time.
inContact only allows specific users to contact them for support. Even though I use the product daily and it accounts for a large amount of my workload, I still have to contact an authorized user to create an incident. These users are managers and their schedules are very busy. This can result in delays in incidents being opened and resolved.
The In-person training was fine for a general overview. I think it would have been really helpful to have a review of pre-built reports and how to use them as tools.
I would rate 10, since the explanations were far enough to catch all the usabilities.I would rate 10, since the explanations were far enough to catch all the usabilities.I would rate 10, since the explanations were far enough to catch all the usabilities.I would rate 10, since the explanations were far enough to catch all the usabilities.
We love the use of our new tools. However, NICE staff turnover was frustrating. We lost ground each time a new team took over. Some people were good some were not as much. Some people did great training while others were not as helpful
When it comes to this specific situation (cell centers) NICE definitely has an ADP beat. The analytics, scheduling, and forecasts are extremely well-tailored for this situation. ADP has a more comprehensive solution in my opinion - I feel their UI and mobile app are also more user-friendly. But in terms of performance management functionality, NICE has a more robust system and is able to create additional metrics if we need them When I used ADP there were no custom options available.
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
I rated 10, because Nice CX one is very much functional. You can simply acess it by website Nice, in any navigator, desktop, notebook or mobile, so you can in a fast way run on every departament of the company.
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.