ONTRAPORT offers customer relations management services that help with content management (creating and hosting webpages), lead tracking, traditional marketing approaches (e-mail, SMS, social media, direct mail), managing online payments, and workflow automation.
$29
per month
Workamajig
Score7.6 out of 10
N/A
Workamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.
$41
per month per user
Pricing
Ontraport
Workamajig
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
In-house
$41
per month per user
Agency
$41
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ontraport
Workamajig
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Ontraport offers a variety of plans to choose from based on the features needed. Pricing adjusts with the number of contacts in the database and users in the account. Monthly or annual plans are available, and all plans start with a 14-day free trial.
Ontraport offers a Done-With-You Setup and Training Package for getting set up in the account quickly. Users can also access a free video library with step-by-step instructions on getting started and using every feature of the platform.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Ontraport
Workamajig
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Ontraport and Workamajig
Feature
Ontraport
9.0
17 Ratings
15% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG email editor
8.216 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic content
10.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
8.37 Ratings
00 Ratings
Landing pages
10.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B testing
9.912 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization
8.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
List management
10.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
9.813 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Ontraport and Workamajig
Feature
Ontraport
5.5
17 Ratings
36% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Lead nurturing automation
7.115 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
2.413 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
2.614 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
10.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Ontraport and Workamajig
Feature
Ontraport
7.7
8 Ratings
2% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Calendaring
6.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
9.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Ontraport and Workamajig
Feature
Ontraport
7.1
4 Ratings
6% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Social sharing and campaigns
7.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social profile integration
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Ontraport and Workamajig
Feature
Ontraport
9.3
16 Ratings
21% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Dashboards
10.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
10.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Ontraport and Workamajig
Feature
Ontraport
7.3
15 Ratings
4% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
API
3.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based workflow & approvals
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizability
10.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Microsoft Dynamics CRM
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with SugarCRM
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Ontraport and Workamajig
Feature
Ontraport
-
Ratings
Workamajig
4.9
13 Ratings
44% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
5.513 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.16 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
5.011 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
4.011 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
4.013 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
5.510 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
1.08 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
8.011 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
4.08 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Ontraport and Workamajig
Here are some cases where Ontraport is well suited : - When writing emails, you can easily access to preview, manage the changes and go back to what you did before - When using automations, if there's an error, you can go back to a previous version of it. There are also some super tools that allows to see where a clients is on an automation without having to go through the all automation. It is less appropriate when you are several colleague that are addressing an issue on an email/automation as it doesn't allows you to be multiple person on the item.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you're looking for a system to help you address accounting that's not suited for marketing agency structures, this is the right tool. It is a bit cumbersome, but it has streamlined our reporting, billing, estimating, and tracking. As for project management, it's great that it integrates with the estimating and finances, but it's just not enjoyable to use. The interface is clunky. So if project management is your main criteria, I'd choose something else. We would never use it to collaborate with clients either because I'd be afraid of making them frustrated by the tool, so we use Basecamp to do that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The Platinum version has a particularly robust time tracking system, down to a 'timer' function that can be critical for an agency like mine where you want to be accountable for billing a client arruately
The ability to make projects available only to those who are permitted to assign their time to it has apparently been very helpful during our revenue reconciliation meetings where time incurred is reviewed against scope
The mobile app, while I still feel needs some work, is pretty handy for a quick calendar check if I'm in a client meeting and cannot utilize my browser to get information
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
WMJ's interface is dated. Despite an html5 driven "sheets"-based interface, it takes a lot of time and effort to manage the interface, which could be streamlined considerably. On a UX/UI scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, WMJ would earn a 6 from me.
Despite the amount of documentation available, there is a distinct lack of clarity in that documentation, and it doesn't fully cover everything you would expect. Branching thoughts, for instance, are not addressed. Additionally, because there are two editions of the software online, there are two support sites that aren't sequestered. So information from both commingles, creating confusion.
Support is available on an email and phone basis. They strongly encourage you to use email, however, and they are resistant to phone time. This is likely because the support staff is limited in number, but has a great depth of knowledge. If you want immediate phone support, however, YOU ARE OUT OF LUCK. You are placed in a queue and the odds of same-day help are low. For email, the response is usually within an hour, but when you are stuck with a configuration issue, or need to generate a report and don't know how to do something, waiting is not optimal. That said, the support team is TERRIFIC.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
My client was already using Ontraport and had a decent investment in the tool. As soon as we turn around the revenue situation with my client's products, we will be ditching OAP immediately, despite the significant re-implementation cost we are going to face moving to a new system. I am part of a high-end, professional marketing group, and the overwhelming sentiment with these other professionals is that one should run away from this as fast as humanly possible. I thought their words were just ungrounded opinion, and I deeply regret that I did not heed them more closely before sinking still more time and effort into OAP.
The software is just easy to use. The UI is fairly intuitive. The help system is pretty good. I find it is pretty quick to get my work completed and if I don't document my things well, I can always figure out how I did something when I need to make changes. When I have a problem the tech support is easy to deal with and when things need to get escalated they are resolved quickly.
Most of the time OP runs fine. But I've had to submit more support tickets this year do to messages, seq.'s or rules not running correctly. Also experienced slow response times moving in and around OP.
The techs are reasonably savvy, highly courteous and want to do right by their customers. Unfortunately, the product they are supporting is so deeply flawed that there's only so much they can do when your legitimate business requirements are simply not supported.
Task management was the main thing that separated ONTRAPORT for me. Keeping things accountable. As well, I felt the campaign builder was slicker, and that the contact management was more robust. Custom fields are very customizable.
Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on premises server behind a VPN although now there are plenty of cloud based solutions that have security compliance greater than what we can provide (fedRamp, etc.)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We are providing better customer service as a direct result of Ontraport. We can track where all of our customers are, what pages/sites/modules they are visiting with ease and tailor our communication accordingly.
Our marketing funnel has become vastly improved, meaning that our ROI for marketing has gone up. Sales this April are double what they were last year.
Our team works better together because we all have a better idea of what the other needs and when. The tasks that we can assign in Ontraport mean nothing gets missed, creating a better customer and employee experience.
The agency switched to an hourly allocation so our clients were subject to a certain amount of hours each quarter. JIG helped us keep track of who was going over hours or who had some to spare. Once the clients went over we would use JIG to help charge the additional fees for going over. It helped keep clients accountable.
It was used to keep track of time sheets and through those time sheets, the directors were able to make a case for more employees on certain accounts. The corporate team hired 3 additional people that were truly needed and our time sheets helped reflect that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info