Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.N/A
Proxmox VE
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Proxmox Virtual Environment is an open source server virtualization management solution based on QEMU/KVM and LXC. Users can manage virtual machines, containers, highly available clusters, storage and networks via a web interface or CLI. Proxmox VE code is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License, version 3. The project is developed and maintained by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH.
$90
year & CPU socket
Untangle NG Firewall
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Untangle NG Firewall is an open-source firewall and gateway security platform. It offers a free core firewall platform with paid add-ons, and a cloud-based management platform with a variety of deployment options for smaller teams.
$0
free under the GNU General Public License (GPL)
Pricing
Red Hat OpenShiftProxmox VEUntangle NG Firewall
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Community
€ 90
year & CPU socket
Basic
€ 280
year & CPU socket
Standard
€ 420
year & CPU socket
Premium
€ 840
year & CPU socket
Open Source Firewall
$0.00
free under the GNU General Public License (GPL)
NG Firewall Complete
$25.00
per month
z4 appliance
$299
one-time purchase
z4w appliance
$329
one-time purchase
z4 Plus appliance
$399.00
one-time purchase
z6 appliance
$1199.00
one-time purchase
z12 appliance
$1999.00
one-time purchase
z20 appliance
$3499.00
one-time purchase
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat OpenShiftProxmox VEUntangle NG Firewall
Free Trial
YesNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsProxmox Virtual Environment's source code is published under the free software license GNU AGPL, v3 and thus is freely available for download, use and share. A Proxmox VE Subscription is an additional service program that helps IT professionals and businesses keep Proxmox VE deployments up-to-date. A subscription provides access to the stable Proxmox VE Enterprise Repository delivering software updates and security enhancements, technical help and support.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat OpenShiftProxmox VEUntangle NG Firewall
Considered Multiple Products
Red Hat OpenShift
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat maintains a consistent user interface across their products, and their feature sets facilitate easy and rapid adoption. Configuration as code is the optimal approach for all of them, and they all provide a level of command-line access that ensures teams can work in the …
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
Cost effective and does they job at a cheaper price point and better. Highly recommend swapping off of VMware ESXI. Especially with the price point.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
More complex but more features
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
OCP and OpenShift Virtualization are better for a code based infrastructure our organization is attempting to move towards shortly. VMware has also been acquired which has added instability with their future. We are planning to move all VMware workloads to OpenShift …
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
I don't have as much experience with the other two, I have heard of them and know they are container management systems. I have the most experience with Red Hat OpenShift.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
only used for Virt. Red Hat OpenShift has more offerings
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Red Hat Data Grid, Red Hat Integration, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
As a specialized partner in container platform Red Hat OpenShift is our preffered solution. It provides a supported kubernetes platform which contains all the required tools to make the life of customers easier and offer them the same experience accross all hyperscalers, …
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
I find OpenShift opinionated but also requiring less configuration to be functional than the other platforms that I've mentioned, and Tanzu requires Faustian contracts to be signed.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
K3s Lightweight Kubernetes and Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes
Chose Red Hat OpenShift
In my experience, Red Hat OpenShift is Much much easier to provision
Proxmox VE
Chose Proxmox VE
Proxmox is somewhat more flexible (for being a Linux distro) than VMware. VMWare's network configuration is more robust and well implemented, but it lacks lots of resources that Proxmox has, like ZFS for example. Overall I think both solutions offer good tools and the best …
Chose Proxmox VE
Proxmox Virtual Environment is better, less costly, it has better CAPEX and OPEX, is open source and more robust and flexible.
It is an agnostic product, one can use a PC clone or a high end server to install it, and it works flawlessly on both.
The product has a large life …
Chose Proxmox VE
Based on my experience , I selected Proxmox VE because it offers a range of powerful features and functionalities at a lower cost than proprietary platforms such as VMware ESXi and Citrix Hypervisor. Additionally, Proxmox VE is an open-source platform, which means that users …
Chose Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE is cheaper than VMware, especially upscaling an HA architecture. Compared with other free or less expensive solutions, Proxmox VE is high compatible with more types of hardware solutions and more VM types. From my point of view, Proxmox VE has no competitor at the …
Chose Proxmox VE
Proxmox emulates hardware exceptionally well. This makes migration easier between systems. Additionally, the licensing model is friendly and the system is quite featureful. On top of that, by having a common base (Debian Linux) we have access to tools without needing to jump …
Chose Proxmox VE
well previously we try to find the fast and lite virtualization platform, we try VMware, we try Citrix, but finally we decided to use Proxmox because it suitable for the development software team, fast provision and delete VM, save a lot of time for DevOps Team.
Chose Proxmox VE
With an incredibly easy to use interface, quick setup, and wide support for different hardware we found it was the perfect lab tool for our department to build, stage, and eventually move VMs into production with.
Chose Proxmox VE
We've used VirtualBox on desktop systems. It's great for what it is, but it's a whole different ballgame to Proxmox VE. Proxmox provides the virtualisation, like VirtualBox, but on top of that you get a very well oiled management layer, storage integration, clustering, etc.

Chose Proxmox VE
I have tried VMWare ESXi, as that was free, but then quickly found out that for cluster I needed the paid version.
Hyper-V server was also tried but did not have an easy high available cluster install without creating a separate domain.
XenServer was a great free alternative, but …
Chose Proxmox VE
VMWare pricing is steep when compared to the Proxmox VE licensing model. You can use Proxmox VE GPL for free to fully evaluate every aspect of it. VMWare also requires you to install software on your virtual machine instances to which you wouldn't normally need. Proxmox VE just …
Untangle NG Firewall
Chose Untangle NG Firewall
Untangle is easier to use and a bit more reliable. Plus the support is very good.
Chose Untangle NG Firewall
I could never come close with these two products to the level of functionality and security I have with Untangle. Simply put, there is absolutely no contest. In addition, the cost of these other solutions was many thousands more than the academic cost for Untangle.
Many times …
Chose Untangle NG Firewall
pfSense and Fortinet FortiGate
Chose Untangle NG Firewall
Simple GUI interface and can run on your hardware a.k.a. old servers with 2 or more NIC's.
Chose Untangle NG Firewall
Untangle NG Firewall has a partnership with third parties to provide an amazing suite of applications. You pay for those. With free software, you have to wait for it to be updated. With Unifi, the hardware was too underpowered to do anything meaningful. I don't mind the monthly …
Chose Untangle NG Firewall
NG Firewall was much more friendly in terms of layout and ease of use, the apps section is familiar to anyone and the config while in a sort of odd order is very clearly laid out. I also appreciate Untangle's endless educational videos and the support can't be beat. Overall …
Chose Untangle NG Firewall
We selected untangle NG due to the flexibility, and the rack based architecture. Period.
Chose Untangle NG Firewall
The Untangle NG Firewall is way more intuitive but the last barracuda I used was almost 8 years ago.
Chose Untangle NG Firewall
We looked at Sonicwall Web Content Filtering Services that can be added to our SonicWall firewall by purchasing a license. Untangle offered more functionality that solved a few of our problems at a cheaper price. Untangle offers a non-profit discount for 501c3 organizations …
Features
Red Hat OpenShiftProxmox VEUntangle NG Firewall
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat OpenShift
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Proxmox VE
-
Ratings
Untangle NG Firewall
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces8.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability9.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead8.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability8.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control8.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration8.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation8.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication8.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery8.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes8.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server Virtualization
Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat OpenShift
-
Ratings
Proxmox VE
7.2
Ratings
11% below category average
Untangle NG Firewall
-
Ratings
Virtual machine automated provisioning00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management console00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Live virtual machine backup00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Live virtual machine migration00 Ratings6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Hypervisor-level security00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat OpenShift
-
Ratings
Proxmox VE
-
Ratings
Untangle NG Firewall
8.2
Ratings
5% below category average
Identification Technologies00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Visualization Tools00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Content Inspection00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Policy-based Controls00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Reporting and Logging00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
VPN00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
High Availability00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Proxy Server00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat OpenShiftProxmox VEUntangle NG Firewall
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.2 out of 10
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.6 out of 10
pfSense
pfSense
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.6 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.6 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat OpenShiftProxmox VEUntangle NG Firewall
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.2
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.9
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat OpenShiftProxmox VEUntangle NG Firewall
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat OpenShift, despite its complexity and overhead, remains the most complete and enterprise-ready Kubernetes platform available. It excels in research projects like ours, where we need robust CI/CD, GPU scheduling, and tight integration with tools like Jupyter, OpenDataHub, and Quiskit. Its security, scalability, and operator ecosystem make it ideal for experimental and production-grade AI workloads. However, for simpler general hosting tasks—such as serving static websites or lightweight backend services—we find traditional VMs, Docker, or LXD more practical and resource-efficient. Red Hat OpenShift shines in complex, container-native workflows, but can be overkill for basic infrastructure needs.
Read full review
Proxmox VE is a virtualization platform that provides a range of features and functionalities suitable for various scenarios. Here are some specific scenarios where Proxmox VE is well suited and some scenarios where it might not be the best choice:Well-suited scenarios:Virtualization of server workloads: Proxmox VE is well suited for virtualizing server workloads such as web servers, mail servers, database servers, and other similar applications. Its high-performance virtualization capabilities allow these workloads to run smoothly and efficiently.Hosting multiple virtual machines (VMs): Proxmox VE is ideal for hosting multiple VMs on a single server. It provides efficient resource management, allowing users to easily allocate resources to each VM.Clustered environments: Proxmox VE is a great choice for clustered environments. It supports clustering and can easily manage multiple servers, providing high availability and load balancing for mission-critical applications. Less appropriate scenarios: Limited hardware resources: Proxmox VE requires significant hardware resources to run efficiently. If you have limited hardware resources, it might not be the best choice. Simple applications: If you only need to run a single, simple application, Proxmox VE might be overkill. Other virtualization platforms or even a basic web hosting service might be more appropriate.
Read full review
Midsized business is where I have used it. Have used it to connect to other Untangle boxes across town and in other countries with NO issues and works with MS Domains across these VPN connections. Probably less appropriate for small home networks or large businesses.
Read full review
Pros
  • One of the big advantages of Red Hat OpenShift is, especially over Kubernetes itself, is that it provides a lot of built-in operators for doing a lot of different things right out of the box that you don't have to worry about trying to configure. So one of the big ones is, I mean, right in your face is that user interface and being able to work with it inside of a browser. And I think that works very, very well.
Read full review
  • ZFS storage out of the box. The integration with ZFS is fantastic. You can easily create pools to store your VM images and data on, and the Proxmox web UI provides an easy way to check drive health, ZFS scrub status, etc.
  • Great web UI. Practically everything configurable is available to do so from the web user interface. You'll rarely need to drop to the command line for administrative tasks, unless you want to, in which case you can do that too. The UI also provides graphs and visualisations to help you keep check of how everything is performing.
  • Easy to setup a high availability cluster. Although Proxmox VE works perfectly well on a single server, you can also install it on multiple hosts and setup a cluster.
  • Uses a Debian core system with an Ubuntu based kernel. This means everything to do with the base operating system is tried and trusted. We use a lot of Debian and Ubuntu installs, so having this run underneath Proxmox VE was an added bonus for us.
Read full review
  • The firewall is easy to set up and manage.
  • The open VPN while not as feature rich as some other options is rock solid and consistently needs nothing
  • The web filter app is great, it's easy to block broad categories or specific things as well as white list whatever is needed.
  • Support is responsive and accurate.
Read full review
Cons
  • I would say that's the logging part because Red Hat OpenShift write tons of locks and if most time in the finance industry, we cannot use the built in logging infrastructure for compliance reasons. And we have to forward the logs out of the system and this is, it's too much, which we forward from one cluster. Most time we'll build up multi clusters, so we speak about 10 or more clusters. And if you send log files from 10 or more clusters, the logging systems are not prepared to take that much load. And then really often you have license problems with the logging system, so that's not really, really fun. So logging could be improved.
Read full review
  • The web UI does not work as well on mobile devices. It is useable, but a mobile optimised / responsive UI would be nice to have. There is a mobile app, so that may alleviate this issue, but I have not yet tried it.
  • Support in the community forums could be better. There are paid support plans, but new users trying out the software will not have access to this. Answers to questions can sometimes be terse, and I can imagine this may put some people off.
  • The wiki is a bit hit and miss with certain topics. I've often seen outdated or missing information, and the whole thing looks like it could do with some polish. I'd love to see it opened up for the community to add to.
Read full review
  • The UI could be a little flashier.
  • Getting your license file moved from one firewall to another can be tough at times... but support is great if you need it.
  • Ability to upload reports to a portal versus getting them emailed would be best (some reports can get 100+ Mb depending on all the bells and whistles).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Going to stay with this platform for the unforeseeable future. It matches our Target Architecture 2030 strategy internally to adopt more modularized platforms with Open Source on the back-end so that if needed containerized workloads can move to a different platform. With open-source based application telemetry collection being utilized on the back-end, integrating our already existing oTeL observability based platform makes it easier for our apps to be monitored
Read full review
Proxmox VE provides the most capable, yet stable virtualization platform in the market today. Licensing options are also competitive and cost-effective for support, and support is extremely fast and knowledgable of getting issues resolved as quickly and soundly as possible.
Read full review
Service renewal is in Feb 2021. We will be renewing!
Read full review
Usability
As I said before, the obserability is one of the weakest point of OpenShift and that has a lot to do with usability. The Kibana console is not fully integrated with OpenShift console and you have to switch from tab to tab to use it. Same with Prometheus, Jaeger and Grafan, it's a "simple" integration but if you want to do complex queries or dashboards you have to go to the specific console
Read full review
The interface is easy to use for most of it, but still lacks screens for some configurations. Also, a few of the screens are not as intuitive as they could be. This is specially true with disk and network configuration, where some graphic/visual representations of the configurations would be very useful
Read full review
Generally works well but seeing more and more bugs with the OpenVPN app.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Redhat openshift is generally reliable and available platform, it ensures high availability for most the situations. in fact the product where we put openshift in a box, we ensure that the availability is also happening at node and network level and also at storage level, so some of the factors that are outside of Openshift realm are also working in HA manner.
Read full review
Proxmox VE's ha-cluster functionality is very much improved, though does have a not-very-often occurrence of failure. In a 2-node cluster of Proxmox VE, HA can fail causing an instance that is supposed to migrate between the two nodes stop and fail until manually recovered through the command-line tools provided. Other than this, the HA clustering capability of Proxmox VE has proven to be reliable in 3 or more clustered environments with much less chance of these failures to occur.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Overall, this platform is beneficial. The only downsides we have encountered have been with pods that occasionally hang. This results in resources being dedicated to dead or zombie pods. Over time, these wasted resources occasionally cause us issues, and we have had difficulty monitoring these pods. However, this issue does not overshadow the benefits we get from Openshift.
Read full review
Proxmox VE's interfacing is always fast to load, both the Web interface and the command-line tool interfaces. Reporting is practically real time almost all the time, and you can see everything in mere seconds, easily able to identify if something is wrong or it everything is in tip-top shape as always desired
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Their customer support team is good and quick to respond. On a couple of occassions, they have helped us in solving some issues which we were finding a tad difficult to comprehend. On a rare occasion, the response was a bit slow but maybe it was because of the festival season. Overall a good experience on this front.
Read full review
They are fast, understanding, very intelligent, know their product very well, fast, responsive, and concise. Need I say more?
Read full review
The phone support reps are highly competent and native-English speakers. big plus vs some other vendors with difficult to understand or less knowledgable support engineers.
Read full review
In-Person Training
I was not involved in the in person training, so i
can not answer this question, but the team in my org worked directly
with Openshift and able to get the in person training done easily, i did not
hear problem or complain in this space, so i hope things happen
seamlessly without any issue.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Online Training
We went thru the training material on RH webesite, i think its very descriptive and the handson lab sesssions are very useful. It would be good to create more short duration videos covering one single aspect of openshift, this wll keep the interest and also it breaks down the complexity to reasonable chunks.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It worked, was easy and super fast to deploy, and provided everything we needed in a matter of minutes
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We utilized the Thycotic Secret Service to manage all our application secrets, resulting in seamless integration with our applications. We developed all the applications using Red Hat Fuse (currently migrated to Quarkus). We used the built-in Kali Linux support of OpenShift to manage and configure the services and API. Additionally, the Red Hat Developer Studio facilitates faster development.
Read full review
Proxmox Virtual Environment is better, less costly, it has better CAPEX and OPEX, is open source and more robust and flexible.
It is an agnostic product, one can use a PC clone or a high end server to install it, and it works flawlessly on both.
The product has a large life cycle, is stable and has few problems and vulnerabilities than the other propietary products.
Read full review
I could never come close with these two products to the level of functionality and security I have with Untangle. Simply put, there is absolutely no contest. In addition, the cost of these other solutions was many thousands more than the academic cost for Untangle. Many times have I experienced threats and inappropriate content passing through these other products. All of that was stopped the moment I implemented Untangle, even before I started to customize the settings.
Read full review
Scalability
This is a great platform to deployment container applications designed for multiple use cases. Its reasonably scalable platform, that can host multiple instances of applications, which can seamlessly handle the node and pod failure, if they are configured properly. There should be some scalability best practices guide would be very useful
Read full review
Proxmox VE provides everything you need to quickly add new storage mediums, network and local, as well as networking interfaces, such as using Linux standard bridges and now Open-vSwitch bridges which can be even more scalable than before. Proxmox VE 4.0 dropped support for OpenVZ in favor of the more well supported and native LXC and made an upgrade path to it very simple.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • When you talk about ROIs, I don't have any negative impacts I wanted to call out here. There is no negative impacts. In fact, it's all positive impacts what we set as our milestones towards achieving our goals, towards achieving our greater vision. Red Hat OpenShift has got a big role in it and it is certainly helping us.
Read full review
  • Due to the open source nature of Proxmox, we have no licensing costs while training our employees
  • We've migrated 100% of our clients to Proxmox and have found improved uptime, and flexibility.
  • In the 10 years of using Proxmox, we've yet to lose any data or not be notified of backup issues.
Read full review
  • Easy setup and implementation made ROI easy to achieve. An Untangle HA solution is 1/2-1/3 the cost of a comparable Cisco/Checkpoint/Palo Alto solution.
  • non-business internet usage has nearly ground to a halt.
  • SD-WAN integration made it easy to connect branch offices quickly without complicated IPSEC configuration.
Read full review
ScreenShots