TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    eDOCS

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AOpenText eDOCS is presented as a light-footprint, cost-effective and highly-flexible enterprise content management (ECM) solution for Legal, Corporate Legal, Public Sector and Professional Service organizations and corporate law departments. eDOCS aims to ensure sensitive work product is securely managed throughout the content lifecycle, while remaining easily accessible for day-to-day operations, to enable users to deliver exceptional enterprise content services to their clients.N/A

    HighQ

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AHighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A
    Pricing
    eDOCSHighQ
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    eDOCSHighQ
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    eDOCSHighQ
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    eDOCSHighQ
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of eDOCS and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    eDOCS
    8.6
    7 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging8.85 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving8.67 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management9.27 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management9.17 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval9.17 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration8.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation8.37 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management8.66 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile support8.67 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration8.87 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of eDOCS and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    eDOCS
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Task Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Scheduling00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Mobile Access00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Search00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
    Visual planning tools00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of eDOCS and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    eDOCS
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.6
    2 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Chat00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Notifications00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Discussions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Surveys00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of eDOCS and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    eDOCS
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    9.4
    2 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Versioning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Video files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Audio files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Document collaboration00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
    Access control00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
    Advanced security features00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    eDOCSHighQ
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    eDOCSHighQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (7 ratings)
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    eDOCSHighQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    My team and I have benefited positively from the work of this platform. Our content and any data that is created during the project implementation process are securely stored in a safe storage space. Documents are arranged well to enhance faster identification during the time of reference. It provides cloud-based based backup support to minimize file losses. It is best suited to the electronic data management suite.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Secure.
    • Accessibility.
    • User experience.
    • Ease of use.
    • One stop solution for all types of file/data storage.
    • Can be accessed via mobile, tablet, laptops.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
    • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
    • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Their learning services could improve
    • The cloud management isn't the best in the market
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    Microsoft SharePoint is a simpler alternative for OpenText eDOCS. It can be used for the same objectives, i.e. to share and manage content, search for information, and collaborate across business areas. Integration with other applications and platforms can be rather limited, in comparison to OpenText eDOCS, but the interface can be considered cleaner than the one of OpenText.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Pros: providing secure application so that we do not worry about security perspective much.
    • Pros : Ease of use.
    • Pros : Accessible via mobile, tablets, cloud, laptops.
    • Cons: Complex.
    • Cons : Pricing can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
    • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
    • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots