OpenText eDOCS vs. Tungsten Capture

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText eDOCS
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText eDOCS is presented as a light-footprint, cost-effective and highly-flexible enterprise content management (ECM) solution for Legal, Corporate Legal, Public Sector and Professional Service organizations and corporate law departments. eDOCS aims to ensure sensitive work product is securely managed throughout the content lifecycle, while remaining easily accessible for day-to-day operations, to enable users to deliver exceptional enterprise content services to their clients.N/A
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Tungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture) is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.
$3,500
per year
Pricing
OpenText eDOCSTungsten Capture
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Kofax Capture
$3,500
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText eDOCSTungsten Capture
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText eDOCSTungsten Capture
Features
OpenText eDOCSTungsten Capture
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText eDOCS
8.6
7 Ratings
6% above category average
Tungsten Capture
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging8.85 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving8.67 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.27 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management9.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval9.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration8.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation8.37 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management8.66 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support8.67 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration8.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText eDOCSTungsten Capture
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText eDOCSTungsten Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(7 ratings)
9.2
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText eDOCSTungsten Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
My team and I have benefited positively from the work of this platform. Our content and any data that is created during the project implementation process are securely stored in a safe storage space. Documents are arranged well to enhance faster identification during the time of reference. It provides cloud-based based backup support to minimize file losses. It is best suited to the electronic data management suite.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Kofax [Capture] meets our needs and for the most part is easy to use and setup. Configuration could be a little bit easier. The scripting language is a double edge sword if you will. It gives you nearly unlimited possibilities to script what you need, but the downside is you have to script it. Does a good job at batching and scanning documents. The tool integrates well into our workflow which makes our business partners happy and in turn provides for happy customers.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Secure.
  • Accessibility.
  • User experience.
  • Ease of use.
  • One stop solution for all types of file/data storage.
  • Can be accessed via mobile, tablet, laptops.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • The VRS application included with Kofax Capture is the best image pre-processing platform available on the market today. It can handle a wide array of common document problems such as skew, flipping, wrinkles, lines, and dots.
  • The platform is incredibly scriptable and can be customized to handle all sorts of unusual document contents to allow information to be extracted that many other platforms just struggle on. Table extraction, line item matching, and smart extraction are all strong points with this platform.
  • Through the use of SBL and .NET the platform can be expanded and scaled quite easily to allow for the software to be integrated into existing business processes and platforms with ease.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • Their learning services could improve
  • The cloud management isn't the best in the market
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • We struggled with configuring Kofax with AP Automation. We used to receive vouchers in different formats by different companies, by different departments. The people from different departments used to scan those vouchers through regular scanners to a central location, which ended up as image pdfs. We fed these image pdfs through Kofax Capture for character recognition, which was painful as the accuracy of recognition was 50 to 60%.
  • Having a connectors with a workflow tool would be helpful where people can validate and approve the output.
  • More samples and documentation related to use of API in .NET applications would be a good improvement, that would help users to adapt the product easily into their organization.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
It's good.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Haven't really used their support yet
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Microsoft SharePoint is a simpler alternative for OpenText eDOCS. It can be used for the same objectives, i.e. to share and manage content, search for information, and collaborate across business areas. Integration with other applications and platforms can be rather limited, in comparison to OpenText eDOCS, but the interface can be considered cleaner than the one of OpenText.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Quality of data capture. Automatic data integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic image integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic invoice booking in Oracle and SAP ERP.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • Pros: providing secure application so that we do not worry about security perspective much.
  • Pros : Ease of use.
  • Pros : Accessible via mobile, tablets, cloud, laptops.
  • Cons: Complex.
  • Cons : Pricing can be improved.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
Read full review
ScreenShots