OpenText MBPM vs. Power Apps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText MBPM
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.N/A
Power Apps
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
PowerApps is a low code / rapid application development product from Microsoft that allows users to quickly build apps.
$20
per month per user
Pricing
OpenText MBPMPower Apps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Power Apps Premium
$20
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText MBPMPower Apps
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
OpenText MBPMPower Apps
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.0
3 Ratings
15% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports4.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.3
3 Ratings
14% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Process designer8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation7.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for modeling languages8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder6.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution6.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.6
3 Ratings
7% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools7.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
6.0
2 Ratings
30% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Content management6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
-
Ratings
Power Apps
7.8
19 Ratings
10% below category average
Visual Modeling00 Ratings7.617 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings9.118 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings9.318 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings8.218 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings4.718 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings8.217 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText MBPMPower Apps
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.1 out of 10
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText MBPMPower Apps
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(5 ratings)
8.3
(21 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.7
(6 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText MBPMPower Apps
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Metastorm is well-suited for scenarios in which internal stress testing an application is needed in a hurry before showcasing it to potential customers. It supports different views of the process from Swimlane perspective, so different methodologies can be handled. It is an Enterprise level tool and handles both small and large projects quite well, although smaller companies may be stressed out by the amount of time it takes to properly maintain the application.
Read full review
Microsoft
PowerApps is well suited for "quick-wins" and fast prototypes of business solutions. It also is beneficial for situations where business partners and developers work together - it allows the business folks to provide a "quick-and-dirty" prototype which is then fleshed-out by developers that are trained experts on the platform. The interactive and easy to understand representation of the solution allows business partners to "see" the solution and add, remove, or correct aspects of it themselves. It provides a common view and understanding of the actual solution across business units and tech teams. PowerApps, being a low-code\no-code platform is not well suited for business processes that require many complex computations or large amounts of custom code - such as solutions that are better architected as Web Site or "full-blown" desktop solutions. There are solutions that are just not easy or quick to accomplish in a low-code\no-code platform. Enterprise Architects should know the difference, however business partners often try to create a solution and only when stuck because it becomes too complex do they engage a tech team for assistance - at which point there are sunk-costs involved and hinderences to re-platforming the solution
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Complex routing of tasks based on calculated criteria
  • Linking between tasks and accessing relevant information
  • Organising, scheduling and prioritising
  • Different views for different people
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Power Apps has formats that are pre-built that don't require any coding which makes it easier to achieve your vision. This does become a challenge if your App needs don't fit into that format.
  • We deal with a ton of data so the fact that you can connect to any data source in addition to their pre-stablished data connections makes the process a breeze.
  • The online learning resources and tutorials are helpful as well for those who are tech savvy.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality.
  • Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool.
  • One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • More complicated to understand in comparison with Nintex Forms.
  • Complicated to find errors.
  • Using PowerApps for SharePoint Forms is a bit complicated by setting up the start and load scenario with a lot of JavaScript.
  • Load values, change them by code, and save them back could be easier. Actually quite complicated to handle a lot of variables.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
There are other products that seem to be a better fit for future initiatives.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Usability
OpenText
Although it is intuitive to use it does require training
Read full review
Microsoft
PowerApps is a great solution and I have spent the last year familiarizing myself with the platform and building custom applications to complete a whole range of tasks such as asset management, custom invoice generation, and item restriction tracking. We as a company have barely begun to scratch the surface of what can be achieved with PowerApps.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Great customer service for an API support related query
Read full review
Microsoft
The community forums are extremely responsive to questions asked, there is a good body of online documentation and many community posts to draw from. Although the platform has changed, which means some of the posts are out of date and the solutions provided aren't relevant. Of relevance, I read over 400 articles plus documentation to get this first app built in SharePoint, move it to SQL and make it work exactly the way it should.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components.
Read full review
Microsoft
Much cheaper, much more customizable, and easier to use. There is not much of a learning curve and the licensing cost is much cheaper. PowerApps does one thing very well, whereas other platforms are mediocre. There is much more customization possible for your in-house workflows that you can build yourself vs using NetSuite engineers to build it for you.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • The development of the ticketing system has enabled us to greatly improve customer relationships
  • The scheduling and allocation of the tasks has reduced both the number of open tickets and the turnaround time to resolution
  • Management information from the system has improved decision making
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It has given us a focal point for development. We now have the possibility of connecting to mobile and the default SharePoint online interface isn't always easy to manipulate. PowerApps has given us an opportunity to improve our user experience.
  • An improved user experience has given us a better shot at compliance. When users don't fight the environment, they don't gravitate towards workarounds or non-compliance.
  • As lists and libraries change, the platform scales pretty well.
  • Having users with the capability to create their own forms and tools has dialed back the app dev need (there is a balance though) and distributed power to the process architects and people who actually need the solutions in the first place—much more efficient model of service delivery: self-service.
Read full review
ScreenShots