TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText MBPM vs. Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText MBPM

    Score7.2 out of 10
    N/AOpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.N/A

    Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AThe Salesforce Platform is designed for building and deploying scalable cloud applications with managed hardware provisioning and app stacks. Lightning Web Components are used by developers to build reusable UI components.

    $25

    Per User Per Month

    Pricing
    OpenText MBPMSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Starter
    $25.00
    Per User Per Month
    Plus
    $100.00
    Per User Per Month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText MBPMSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText MBPMSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Salesforce
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Would buy again
    25 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    21 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    25 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    82%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    Features
    OpenText MBPMSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of OpenText MBPM and Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Feature
    OpenText MBPM
    7.0
    3 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports4.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of OpenText MBPM and Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Feature
    OpenText MBPM
    7.3
    3 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    -
    Ratings
    Process designer8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process simulation7.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business rules engine9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    SOA support6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process player7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for modeling languages8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form builder6.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model execution6.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Collaboration
    Comparison of Collaboration features of OpenText MBPM and Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Feature
    OpenText MBPM
    7.6
    3 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    -
    Ratings
    Social collaboration tools7.63 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content Management Capabilties
    Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of OpenText MBPM and Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Feature
    OpenText MBPM
    6.0
    2 Ratings
    30% below category average
    Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    -
    Ratings
    Content management6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of OpenText MBPM and Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Feature
    OpenText MBPM
    -
    Ratings
    Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    7.2
    30 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings7.030 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings8.028 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings8.024 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings8.027 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings7.028 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings7.028 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings7.025 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings6.023 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.026 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings6.025 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.028 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText MBPMSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Small Businesses
    Process Street
    Score8.2 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    TIBCO® BPM Enterprise
    Score8 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Score10 out of 10
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText MBPMSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.1
    (5 ratings)
    8.9
    (36 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (9 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.1
    (15 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText MBPMSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Metastorm is well-suited for scenarios in which internal stress testing an application is needed in a hurry before showcasing it to potential customers. It supports different views of the process from Swimlane perspective, so different methodologies can be handled. It is an Enterprise level tool and handles both small and large projects quite well, although smaller companies may be stressed out by the amount of time it takes to properly maintain the application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Salesforce
    If you have a large customer base and a large amount of data on each of your customers, it is really strong in creating personalized content that your salespeople can use in their pitch meetings—and then setting up workflows for automated for lifecycle journey creations to automatically go out to customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Complex routing of tasks based on calculated criteria
    • Linking between tasks and accessing relevant information
    • Organising, scheduling and prioritising
    • Different views for different people
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Salesforce
    • It has a very smooth integration with Salesforce and third-party tools, ensuring easy tracking of policies and assets.
    • It also has impressive security features like used-based permissions and encrypted data.
    • Everything can be managed from a centralized place which saves a lot of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality.
    • Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool.
    • One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice.
    Read full review
    Salesforce
    • It takes a while before it recognizes bounced emails.
    • We get so many notifications from a single action. Not sure if this can be modified in the settings though.
    • Error messages are sometimes unclear which makes it hard for us to identify the problem.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    There are other products that seem to be a better fit for future initiatives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Salesforce
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    OpenText
    Although it is intuitive to use it does require training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Salesforce
    It's very good, but it's still living in a little bit in an older design aspect, but I think a lot of it is about to come out, just hasn't quite gotten there yet. Still a little clunky from a you have to know it to know it or you know it to use it. It takes a little bit of training to get into it. It's not quite the, anybody can come in and start using it immediately, type feel.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    Great customer service for an API support related query
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Salesforce
    I am not an administrator so there may very well be outstanding Support and I am just not privy to it. On a user level it's hard to gauge the effectiveness and responsiveness of Support because nearly everything has to go through an administrator
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Salesforce
    We were previously using an older version prior to it becoming Salesforce Lightning Platform so we were well adverse on the advantages of using a CRM, to begin with. It made sense to convert to Salesforce Lightning Platform after we were given a free trial of the platform. Certain reps were chosen to experiment with it and from there a decision was made to move forward. We've been customers ever since.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • The development of the ticketing system has enabled us to greatly improve customer relationships
    • The scheduling and allocation of the tasks has reduced both the number of open tickets and the turnaround time to resolution
    • Management information from the system has improved decision making
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Salesforce
    • Better visibility of Accounts and Contacts interactions makes it easier to maintain during employee transitions.
    • Tracking of current jobs and relating them to past jobs is very useful.
    • More efficient use of Sales Reps time.
    • Sales Managers have good visibility into how their people are working.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots