TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle CPQ

    Score5.5 out of 10
    N/AOracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.

    $240

    per month per user

    SAP Subscription Billing

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/ASAP Subscription Billing is a cloud‑based solution that enables businesses to launch, manage, and scale subscription and usage‑based business models with speed and confidence. SAP Subscription Billing helps reduce operational complexity by automating critical order‑to‑cash processes and ensuring accurate, transparent billing.N/A
    Pricing
    Oracle CPQSAP Subscription Billing
    Editions & Modules
    CPQ Pricing
    $240.00
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle CPQSAP Subscription Billing
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Oracle CPQSAP Subscription Billing
    Considered Both Products
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    SAP
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    11 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    11 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    Features
    Oracle CPQSAP Subscription Billing
    CPQ
    Comparison of CPQ features of Oracle CPQ and SAP Subscription Billing
    Feature
    Oracle CPQ
    6.7
    18 Ratings
    26% below category average
    SAP Subscription Billing
    -
    Ratings
    Quote sharing/sending7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product configuration8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration options8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pricing rules7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Price adjustment5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Purchase history and open contracts6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Guided selling/Sales portal7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ reporting & analytics7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ-CRM integration7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
    Attachments to quotes5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order capturing7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Oracle CPQSAP Subscription Billing
    Small Businesses
    QuoteWerks
    Score9.7 out of 10
    WooCommerce Subscriptions
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    QuoteWerks
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Chargebee
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Agentforce Revenue Management
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Zuora
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Oracle CPQSAP Subscription Billing
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (45 ratings)
    8.4
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (26 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    3.0
    (8 ratings)
    8.2
    (11 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    2.0
    (6 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Oracle CPQSAP Subscription Billing
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    The last one, we had to add a historical discount for a customer that sent us its usage data with significant delay. Because the software is designed to have a linear flow of onward-looking data, retroactively fixing previous records felt like working against the system. But when we launched a new product with tiered pricing and setup fees, the configuration was fast
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Leveraged automation to minimize headcount costs despite 10% year-over-year business growth, and enabled staff to focus on more strategic tasks.
    • Established a flexible CPQ system that scales on demand to easily accommodate the company’s multiple global locations.
    • Improved customer relations by reducing configuration time and allowing sales more time to meet with customers and close orders.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • SAP Subscription Billing helps in reconciliations of data , Posting journals and helps in providing accurate data during month end,
    • Subscription Billing integrates with S/4HANA and helps use existing models to create accurate reports.
    • Subscription Billing also provides AI capability to enhance the functionality to provide accuracy in data reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
    • Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
    • Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • It is working fine for our organization no improvement needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Oracle
    So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    Based on ROI, it seems like a good investment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Oracle
    The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    It scores 8 because it dramatically simplifies SaaS rate configuration and automates complex mid cycle proration out of box. It only looses points due to configuration guard rail
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Oracle
    Other than one day two years ago and an hour or two a few times since then due to data center outages, it has been very reliable
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Oracle
    It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Oracle
    Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
    Read full review
    SAP
    No in-house support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Oracle
    They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Oracle
    It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.

    Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.

    EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.

    The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.

    Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
    Read full review
    SAP
    Not involved in implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
    Read full review
    SAP
    SAP BRIM (Billing and Revenue Innovation Management) is part of SAP portfolio and therefore from package perspective a better choice. We implemented Zuora first but moving over to BRIM; faster implementation, better operations cost and support within SAP RISE Contract Package
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
    • Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
    • A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Saves around 20-25% time in creating and checking the invoices/billings data .
    • ability to integrate with S/4HANA which is our legacy system helps to use existing data models to save time in creating new ones.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    SAP Subscription Billing Screenshots

    Screenshot of a bill's detailsScreenshot of bill overviewScreenshot of a customer overviewScreenshot of a launchpadScreenshot of a product pageScreenshot of a product page