Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Startdeliver
Score10 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$445
per month
Pricing
Oracle CPQ
Startdeliver
Editions & Modules
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Basic
$445
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle CPQ
Startdeliver
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Oracle CPQ
Startdeliver
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Oracle CPQ and Startdeliver
Feature
Oracle CPQ
6.7
18 Ratings
26% below category average
Startdeliver
-
Ratings
Quote sharing/sending
7.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product configuration
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration options
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pricing rules
7.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Price adjustment
5.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal
7.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics
7.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes
5.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order capturing
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Oracle CPQ and Startdeliver
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Startdeliver
10.0
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Oracle CPQ and Startdeliver
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Startdeliver
10.0
1 Ratings
14% above category average
API
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Customer Data Extraction / Integration
Comparison of Customer Data Extraction / Integration features of Oracle CPQ and Startdeliver
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Startdeliver
9.5
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Product usage
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Help desk / support tickets
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customer Success Management
Comparison of Customer Success Management features of Oracle CPQ and Startdeliver
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Startdeliver
9.4
1 Ratings
9% above category average
NPS surveys
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Sponsor tracking
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customer profiles
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Automated workflow
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Internal collaboration
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Customer health scoring
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customer segmentation
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
CSM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CSM Reporting & Analytics features of Oracle CPQ and Startdeliver
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
with Startdeliver, we could instantly know what are clients are doing in our platform, even our salesteam testing out prospects. this is such an invaluable insight to have. And by also adding an integration to a CRM, this is just a cheat code done so simply, that competitors can only look in awe.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Not necessarily a bad thing, but being so simple, it could contain even more advanced features for "customer success", but however, the reason you really use Startdeliver is for its simplicity
could be slightly more distinct separation between customers and internal user (you confuse what is what sometimes)
I don't fully understand the naming and logic about their new packages, but this is subjective opinion
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
from its incredible UI/X, to its easy to use features, to its native integrations, and to its overall approach to easily keep track of your customer success function as such - if you are not using Startdeliver as a CS team - you must be doing something wrong, so don't hesitate.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.
Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.
EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.
The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.
Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
Planhat might be a unicorn headed platform with incredible functions and features as well, but in reality, who will really use all of those features? Most CS teams just wants simplicity, not for things to become rocket science. Stay simple and go for a platform that will keep you grounded to the hardcore basics, and let your CS team do the rest.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info