PandaDoc vs. Powertrak CPQ
PandaDoc vs. Powertrak CPQ
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
PandaDoc | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $19 per user/per month | |
Powertrak CPQ | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Axonom is the developer of cloud-based configure, price, quote CPQ software with virtual reality and augmented reality experiences for the high-tech, manufacturing, and services industries. Powertrak Visual CPQ and VR suite enables sales, channel partners, and customers around the world to interactively build products and visually design environments, then experience it in immersive virtual reality. Powertrak CPQ features interactive 2D and 3D… | $300 per month |
PandaDoc | Powertrak CPQ | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation starting at $19 per month per user. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
PandaDoc | Powertrak CPQ | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
|
|
Top Cons |
|
|
PandaDoc | Powertrak CPQ | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | PDFfiller Score 9.0 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score 9.2 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | MSB Docs Score 9.6 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score 9.2 out of 10 |
Enterprises | DocuSign Score 8.4 out of 10 | SAP Sales Cloud Score 8.2 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
PandaDoc | Powertrak CPQ | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 (270 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 (18 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 8.0 (23 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Availability | 9.1 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 9.6 (21 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 5.2 (23 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 6.3 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 2.8 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 9.0 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 8.6 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 9.9 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | 6.7 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
PandaDoc | Powertrak CPQ | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Pros | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Cons | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Likelihood to Renew | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Usability | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Reliability and Availability | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Performance | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Implementation Rating | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Scalability | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | PandaDoc | Axonom No answers on this topic |
ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots | Powertrak CPQ Screenshots |