PandaDoc vs. Tungsten SignDoc
PandaDoc vs. Tungsten SignDoc
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PandaDoc | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat | |
Tungsten SignDoc | N/A | Tungsten SignDoc is an enterprise-level electronic signature solution for the cloud that has functionality for complete signing scenarios. It helps organizations remove the need for capturing wet ink signatures on paper documents. | $2,500 per year Includes 1000 Signing Packages, Unlimited users |
| PandaDoc | Tungsten SignDoc | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | Pricing is per signing package that decreases with volume purchases. There is no limit on the number of users with SignDoc! Price does not include the cost of 3rd party certification. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| PandaDoc | Tungsten SignDoc |
|---|
| PandaDoc | Tungsten SignDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Foxit eSign Score 9.0 out of 10 | Foxit eSign Score 9.0 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | MSB Docs Score 9.4 out of 10 | MSB Docs Score 9.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | DocuSign Score 8.7 out of 10 | DocuSign Score 8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| PandaDoc | Tungsten SignDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.8 (329 ratings) | 9.5 (2 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 (18 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Usability | 8.3 (23 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Availability | 9.1 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Performance | 9.6 (21 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 6.1 (23 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | 6.3 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Configurability | 2.8 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | 8.6 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.7 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | 6.7 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| PandaDoc | Tungsten SignDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
|
| Pros | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
|
| Cons | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
|
| Likelihood to Renew | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax) No answers on this topic |
| Usability | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax) No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax) No answers on this topic |
| Performance | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax) No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax) No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax) No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
|
| Scalability | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax) No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | PandaDoc
| ![]() Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
|
| ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots | Tungsten SignDoc Screenshots |












