PandaDoc vs. Tungsten SignDoc
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PandaDoc | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat |
Tungsten SignDoc | Score7.7 out of 10 | N/A | Tungsten SignDoc is an enterprise-level electronic signature solution for the cloud that has functionality for complete signing scenarios. It helps organizations remove the need for capturing wet ink signatures on paper documents. | $2,500 per year Includes 1000 Signing Packages, Unlimited users |
| PandaDoc | Tungsten SignDoc | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | Pricing is per signing package that decreases with volume purchases. There is no limit on the number of users with SignDoc! Price does not include the cost of 3rd party certification. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| PandaDoc | Tungsten SignDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 222 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
97% Delivers good value for the price 204 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 221 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 174 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 182 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| PandaDoc | Tungsten SignDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | BoldSign, by Syncfusion Score10 out of 10 | BoldSign, by Syncfusion Score10 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | OneSpan Sign Score9.6 out of 10 | OneSpan Sign Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | DocuSign Score8.7 out of 10 | DocuSign Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| PandaDoc | Tungsten SignDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | - |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 9.6 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.1 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 6.3 | - |
| Configurability | 2.8 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 8.6 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.7 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 6.7 | - |
| PandaDoc | Tungsten SignDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots | Tungsten SignDoc Screenshots |












