PostgreSQL vs. SAP HANA Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PostgreSQL
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
PostgreSQL (alternately Postgres) is a free and open source object-relational database system boasting over 30 years of active development, reliability, feature robustness, and performance. It supports SQL and is designed to support various workloads flexibly.N/A
SAP HANA Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
SAP HANA is an application that uses in-memory database technology to process very large amounts of real-time data from relational databases, both SAP and non-SAP, in a very short time. The in-memory computing engine allows HANA to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk which means that the data can be accessed in real time by the applications using HANA. The product is sold both as an appliance and as a cloud-based software solution.N/A
Pricing
PostgreSQLSAP HANA Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PostgreSQLSAP HANA Cloud
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsIncludes a one year free trial.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PostgreSQLSAP HANA Cloud
Considered Both Products
PostgreSQL
Chose PostgreSQL
My expirence with other solutions is very limited, but what I saw/heard is, that on Azure the managed MS SQL Server is said to be more flexible and you can use it in a serverless-ish fashion. But on the other hand, PostgresSQL is still strong regarding its efficiency. And in my …
Chose PostgreSQL
Being open source, PostgreSQL offers the highest performance among its peers. It has a strong support community where we can find solutions to most of the queries. It's suited for GIS (Geospatial) based applications, making it unique from its peers. There are fewer databases …
Chose PostgreSQL
We had to use PostgreSQL as that is the DB preferred by our SaaS Provider.
Chose PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL holds it own against both these options. Some of these DBs are in play for certain needs but the majority are PostgreSQL because of cost and operational performance.
Chose PostgreSQL
In my experience using all of these products over many years, PostgreSQL is better than any of them in reliability, performance, productivity, cost, scalability and interoperability across operating systems.
Chose PostgreSQL
MySQL is an Oracle product which has in itself some known issues due to that (support, contract terms). Based on my knowledge, PostgreSQL support everything that MySQL support (syntax wise) and it adds more improvements and syntaxes that make the life of database engineers and …
Chose PostgreSQL
First It's open source and it's cost-effective compared to other databases.PostgreSQL can be easily integrated with numerous platforms. It is well known and appreciated so relying on it as our system database can be easily accepted by our customers. And if your developing a …
Chose PostgreSQL
For our use cases, PostgreSQL is just as feature rich as other options, costs less, and is simple to get up and running. There is also a plethora of documentation to support it which makes it a great option for a small scale startup without needing high levels of expertise to …
Chose PostgreSQL
In this case, Postgres is preferred because it handles large data sets and requires fewer hardware resources than its competitor, MySQL. Compared to PostgreSQL, Microsoft products are excellent, but the installation process for MS SQL is lengthy. PostgreSQL has an advantage …
Chose PostgreSQL
I've been using different databases for the past 20 years, solutions like MS SQL Server, MySQL, MariaDB, Interbase, Firebird, DB2, etc., and by using them I wasn't able to be neither close to the performance PostgreSQL deliver. Also, it is one of the most popular databases on …
Chose PostgreSQL
Although the competition between the different databases is increasingly aggressive in the sense that they provide many improvements, new functionalities, compatibility with complementary components or environments, in some cases it requires that it be followed within the same …
Chose PostgreSQL
We evaluated both PostgreSQL and MySQL, two popular open source relational databases. While they are very similar in most areas, PostgreSQL's reliability and performance won us over, plus it has much better support from cloud vendors we also work with.
Chose PostgreSQL
Postgres stacks up just [fine] along the other big players in the RDBMS world. It's very popular for a reason. It's very close to mySQL in terms of cost and features - I'd pick either solution and be just as happy. Compared to Oracle it is a MUCH cheaper solution that is just …
Chose PostgreSQL
A free corporate professional product. Who does not want to have such a thing, we hesitated because we did not know the product before and frankly we did not want it at first. But when we give it a chance, it has been running smoothly for years.
Chose PostgreSQL
When we were originally evaluating Redshift we ran into some issue with dates. Either way, Postgres is a better choice than Redshift because it avoids vendor lockin. We ended up choosing Postgres over MySQL because it was easier at the time to get a hosted Postgres cluster up …
Chose PostgreSQL
As I have been telling all along, PostgreSQL is much cheaper compared to the other RDBMS solutions. It has got better performance with some of the application services that we are using and is easy to maintain. Overall, we are satisfied migrating to PostgreSQL database clusters.
Chose PostgreSQL
Much more mature and stable when compared to MySQL with features such as MVCC, complex subquery plans, ORDBMS, and NoSQL support. With Oracle retaining rights to MySQL its future as an open database is less secure and is no longer in the hands of the community. PostgreSQL also …
Chose PostgreSQL
Its main characteristic is the integrity of the data. In addition, being free software, it has no costs associated with its license, which allows the number of installations to be scaled without problems.
The technical staff quickly learns about its installation, configuration …
Chose PostgreSQL
Both Oracle and MS-SQL database option fell when we evaluated the effect on our overall solution cost to our customers. customer examine the overall cost of the solution they buy, selecting Oracle or MS-SQL would leave less money in our pockets.
We are Linux based solutions and …
Chose PostgreSQL
PostgrPostgreSQL as a transaction db engine against oracle and sql server works well. TPM wise compared to MySQL and MariaDB, on an evan scale.
SQL function supports, far outweighs compared to MySQL and MariaDB. PG Extensions allow for flexibiltity and scalability. Allows …
Chose PostgreSQL
We selected PostgreSQL due to the number of employees who have used it in the past.
The data consistency guarantees.
The multiple transaction isolation levels support.
Chose PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL outperforms every other option. It is faster, more flexible, more reliable, easier to maintain, and more consistent in behaviour than any of the other offerings.
Chose PostgreSQL
The main reason for select PostgreSQL against MS SQL Server Express edition is the necessity to use open-source platform, without any issues for licensing, client licensing, etc. etc, which is usually follows developers and project managers when they start to use products and …
Chose PostgreSQL
I think Postgres stacks up great against all modern database solutions and has continued to be a trend leader in this space.
SAP HANA Cloud
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
As our organization was already using various SAP applications we choose SAP HANA Cloud. It was easier to integrate various SAP applications in SAP HANA Cloud than IBM Cloud Databases.
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
A standard Laboratory information systems, QEdge and Trackwise all are functional application. They are brilliant in providing information and data in real time, where SAP HANA Cloud is a data platform,which seats beneath the data managing system and helps for QA oversight for …
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
Faster implementation and easy to use. When we compare to other ERPs in the market. It provides unified processing of transactional data and better memory processing. Compared to other platforms, it better supports the AI area. It also has a strong infrastructure to support …
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud is a leading Database-as-a-Service solution which offers more advanced features than IBM Cloud databases
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
Webonise Olympus Platform, DataWalk and AFrame
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
SAP Fieldglass and SAP Concur
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
In my experience, SAP HANA Cloud has an easy setup
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud was overall much better for professional service
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
Orbit Reporting and Analytics
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud offers high-performance analytical capabilities than IBM Cloud databases. It also offers smooth SAP applications integration.
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
We choose SAP HANA Cloud because it offers high-performance in-memory database which provides faster data processing and real time analytics.
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
We choose SAP HANA Cloud over IBM Cloud Database because we are more familiar with SAP products. It also provides many advanced features than IBM Cloud Databases
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
The reason for the selection was that, after reviewing several, it is the one with the best recommendations in the market.

el tema de la seleccion fue por que despues de que se revisaorn varios es el que tiene mejores recomendaciones en el marcado
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
They are both easy to work with.
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
They are best-in-class as a SAP product for integrating with SAP & non-SAP applications. A clean core approach makes the Application more stable.
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
Much more integrated with other SAP offerings and very powerful response. Less focused on pro-code scenarios, e.g., using notebooks. Extreme workloads can become expensive and more difficult to scale than the dedicated tools that separate the compute completely from the …
Chose SAP HANA Cloud
Evaluated for its separation of compute and storage and lower entry cost, but it lacked the native understanding of complex SAP ERP semantics (ABAP logic) without extensive data reconstruction
Features
PostgreSQLSAP HANA Cloud
Relational Databases
Comparison of Relational Databases features of Product A and Product B
PostgreSQL
-
Ratings
SAP HANA Cloud
8.6
Ratings
7% above category average
ACID compliance00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Database monitoring00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Database locking00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Disaster recovery00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Multiple datatypes00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PostgreSQLSAP HANA Cloud
Small Businesses
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 9.0 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SQLite
SQLite
Score 8.0 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
SQLite
SQLite
Score 8.0 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 6.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PostgreSQLSAP HANA Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.3
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PostgreSQLSAP HANA Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Based on my experience, PostgreSQL is exactly what I imagine when thinking of a relational database: it is fast for querying and intuitive (if the underlying relations have been well written) and its writes are also efficient. Of course you need to know that a relational database is what you need, for example I would not recommend it if you have a lot of unstructured data that have no way to create a relation from and if you need to run heavy aggregations over your data, as it is not where PostgreSQL would shine.
Read full review
I think if you have a large organization, it's probably the product and the marketplace to go to. We're a large management consulting firm operating in four to seven countries. And generally speaking, I think that's the size and the scope where it scales best. I can't speak to smaller companies, but I can't see smaller companies leveraging the benefits as much as a larger organization can.
Read full review
Pros
  • The stability it offers, its speed of response and its resource management is excellent even in complex database environments and with low-resource machines.
  • The large amount of resources it has in addition to the many own and third-party tools that are compatible that make productivity greatly increase.
  • The adaptability in various environments, whether distributed or not, [is a] complete set of configuration options which allows to greatly customize the work configuration according to the needs that are required.
  • The excellent handling of referential and transactional integrity, its internal security scheme, the ease with which we can create backups are some of the strengths that can be mentioned.
Read full review
  • SAP HANA Cloud can help drive data analytics, data migration, and data management exceptionally well.
  • It offers an integration service that lets you integrate data and processes with 3rd party app or any other cloud app.
  • In-memory capability helps in faster data processing.
Read full review
Cons
  • The query syntax for JSON fields is unwieldy when you start getting into complex queries with many joins.
  • I wish there was a distinction (a flag) you could set for automated scripts vs working in the psql CLI, which would provide an 'Are you sure you want to do X?' type prompt if your query is likely to affect more than a certain number of rows. Especially on updates/deletes. Setting the flag in the headless(scripted) flow would disable the prompt.
  • Better documentation around JSON and Array aggregation, with more examples of how the data is transformed.
Read full review
  • Requires higher processing power, otherwise it won't fly. How ever computing costs are lower. Incase you are migrating to cloud please do not select the highest config available in that series . Upgrading it later against a reserved instance can cost you dearly with a series change
  • Lack of clarity on licensing is one major challenge
  • Unless S/4 with additional features are enabled mere migration HANA DB is not a rewarding journey. Power is in S/4
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
As a needed software for day to day development activities
Read full review
At this moment we are not focusing on SAP, however would love to in the future. This is primarily because of our limited ability to generate more revenue to fund for SAP partnerships and products. Our initial tryst with SAP Partneredge open ecosystem didn't go as planned and we have shelved that for now. Hope we can revive in the future
Read full review
Usability
Postgresql is the best tool out there for relational data so I have to give it a high rating when it comes to analytics, data availability and consistency, so on and so forth. SQL is also a relatively consistent language so when it comes to building new tables and loading data in from the OLTP database, there are enough tools where we can perform ETL on a scalable basis.
Read full review
It is very useful solution which provides you speedier data processing, real-time analytics. It helps you manage diverse data types. It also offers you excellent disaster management. It has user friendly interface which helps you navigate system and transactions easily and perform task smoothly.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
PostgreSQL's availability is top notch. Apart from connection time-out for an idle user, the database is super reliable.
Read full review
so far, we didn't get any outage
Read full review
Performance
The data queries are relatively quick for a small to medium sized table. With complex joins, and a wide and deep table however, the performance of the query has room for improvement.
Read full review
so far good
Read full review
Support Rating
There are several companies that you can contract for technical support, like EnterpriseDB or Percona, both first level in expertise and commitment to the software.
But we do not have contracts with them, we have done all the way from googling to forums, and never have a problem that we cannot resolve or pass around. And for dozens of projects and more than 15 years now.
Read full review
One specific example of how the support for SAP HANA Cloud impacted us is in our efforts to troubleshoot and resolve technical issues. Whenever we encountered an issue or had a question, the support team was quick to respond and provided us with clear and actionable guidance. This helped us avoid downtime and keep our analytics operations running smoothly.
Read full review
Online Training
The online training is request based. Had there been recorded videos available online for potential users to benefit from, I could have rated it higher. The online documentation however is very helpful. The online documentation PDF is downloadable and allows users to pace their own learning. With examples and code snippets, the documentation is great starting point.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The online documentation of the PostgreSQL product is elaborate and takes users step by step.
Read full review
Professional GIS people are some of the most risk-averse there are, and it's difficult to get them to move to HANA in one step. Start with small projects building to 80% use of HANA spatial over time.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
In my experience using all of these products over many years, PostgreSQL is better than any of them in reliability, performance, productivity, cost, scalability and interoperability across operating systems.
Read full review
It enables preview and better cloud service than other cloud platforms. Easy document transfer and faster document transfer are the key points for the selection of the HANA cloud server. The preview of data before its execution is also one of the factors in the selection of the HANA server.
Read full review
Scalability
The DB is reliable, scalable, easy to use and resolves most DB needs
Read full review
Limitation of training deliverable by organization
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • A robust and reliable platform reduces the risk of data loss and confusion.
  • Using an almost free product is economical. No license fees = minimal ownership cost.
  • Efficiency is high due to quickness and excellent resource management.
  • PostgreSQL helps us achieve our goals, and there are no time-consuming management tasks.
Read full review
  • Enhanced agility and innovation, improved decision-making, and reduced IT infrastructure costs are some positive impacts.
  • The process of migrating data and applications to the cloud may require downtime and disrupt operations.
  • It involves implementing additional security controls and addressing data residency requirements, which can have a negative impact.
Read full review
ScreenShots