QT9 QMS vs. Verint Automated Quality Management

I like using QT9 because it's easy to use, easy to train others and is very user friendly. QT9 has all that we need to be successful. Our data tracking, corrective actions, documentation tracking and the reporting of that data is extremely easy to use and implement. We also think that the EC process is very useful for updating designs

Getting a view of all calls and a good pool of calls is the automated qualities strong suite. It can validate and score anything that is within he applicable rule set. Usually, AQM is good for answering yes/no questions, would like to see some functionality around call segments or actions like hold

Incentivized

• Tracks document reviews well.
• Makes creating NCP's and CARs easier than paper.
• Tracks and maintains calibration records well.

• Agent Score Cards
• Advise when agents need coaching / additional training
• Enable 100% scaling of call / interaction monitoring
• Reduce resources needed to otherwise manually review agents.

Incentivized

• Better graphics/visually appealing and easier to navigate
• It would be nice to have a chat feature
• The interface with our vendors/customers isn't always smooth.

• Layering in additional conditions into questions could probably be improved slightly. A lot of time is being spent on rebuilds and customizing additional layers of questioning.

Incentivized

document tracking and updating has been clearer.

ease of use and implementation. user defined fields allow customization. exporting information into excel permits the use of pivot tables to analyze data and create reports. In geneneral, the main features required by our QMS are in the software

Incentivized

Access cannot be restricted in the form designer at the form level. In order to give admin access for AQM it opens up access to all form. In a company with multiple organizations, we wouldn't want others to be able to modify forms.

Incentivized

QT9 QMS has always been available. Even in instances where there would be an update, notifications would be sent out to provide a heads up to the users. Any issues where QT9 QMS would have problems, glitches, or run slow, support was always available to take care of the issues.

I give it a 10 as the information is always readily available. As for speed, For the most part, loading of the sometimes takes a little longer than others. There are occasional times that it does run a little slow, but when that happens, the support team has always been there to help.

The usability and clarity of documentation and tracking is fantastic. Calibration is always open and trackable as well.

I had online training which was wonderful. The training was open and inviting to ask questions. I came on just after QT9 QMS was accepted in the company. SO I was in almost at the ground floor.

Training was open and was able to ask any questions. This provided clarity in all the areas that I would use. There has been training readily offered by the QT9 company and provided opportunities to grow our understanding of the software and additional ways that we could utilize it.

It went well and is used daily.

We have not used any other systems Prior to QT9 QMS our systems were all manual and down through excel and email.

We did not know how to use it effectively at first so we got extra training but it doesn't really help us where we spend the most time evaluating quality - on procedural/technical accuracy.

Incentivized

We have sites in many different areas within and outside of our current state. The use of QT9 QMS allows all sites to be in one database so everyone has the same information. The rollout of the software was rather easy as online training could be used for all sites and provided an excellent tool for all areas.

not sure if this is something other than the professionalism of the individuals that I worked with, but the people were Very professional. Always able to answer questions and if they did not have answers they would find out what they are and then follow up.

• visiablity of controlled documents and those that are out for revision has been good
• great central hub to allow users from other facitilities to use the same documents/processes
• visiabiliy of the status of the engineering changes

Incentivized

• We had another product that we decommissioned so we have been without AQM for 9 months now
• Negative, Still not up and running as expected

Incentivized