Siteimprove vs. UXCam Product Analytics

Siteimprove works well for managing the health and performance of your customer-facing sites in terms of performance, digital experience, and accessibility. It also helps to define policies to proactively avoid experience breaks or issues for customers before they occur. It can improve by providing more options to configure policies for large sites with thousands of pages.

Incentivized

UXCam App Analytics help identify the user pain points and improvement areas within our app. It helps observe the app from a customer's perspective and hence communication around any new updates with stakeholders get easy. These can be times when we aren't able to view the complete recordings due to delays in loading or randomisation of samples.

Incentivized

• User-friendly customisable dashboards, easy to make a dashboard from a template, or create your own, and add in whichever 'widgets' are relevant for what you are looking at
• Flagging words to review, allowing users to check and confirm if the word is 'accepted' or is a misspelling

Incentivized

• User flow mapping. It shows how users are navigating in the app.
• App crashes
• User session recordings
• Segmentation on devices, OS versions, processors etc

Incentivized

• I don't like that there are different navigation paths to go from point A to point B. When I want to navigate to a specific place, I have more than one way to get there, which means I have to make a decision about how I want to there and I'd rather the designer make that design based on what would be most efficient for me.

• Loading time is high due to which we have to wait a lot sometimes
• In heatmaps, more properties can be added eg. User cohort, experiment id
• Provide filters to easily check the recordings by screen and feature dropoffs

Incentivized

Tool has undergone numerous changes, both to function and UX/CX. Makes it less than user friendly at times. But on the other hand, that does indicate a willingness to improve the product in a continual manner - which they've done nearly year after year - but it's always a case of who moved my cheese with each new iteration.

I've used support often and it has been responsive, thorough and considerate of our needs. I can get a tech right away, they understand the issue, and work with us to resolve it. Often the problem is with the site we are trying to scan, sometimes it is with their product. I appreciate that they go beyond support into continually helping us implement SiteImprove in more places with 3rd party integration.

We have used or tested other tools that get installed on a computer or that are hosted online, but none of them offer the features that come with Siteimprove. TotalValidator Pro will check your site for accessibility issues, but it is a manual check and there is no historical reporting. I can;t remember the names of the other online solutions, but even if they offered similar features as Siteimprove, they were all very expensive .

Incentivized

UXCam provided higher coverage of features than Mixpanel or Inspectlet standalone. In fact, it has the features if you combine both the products which is amazing. In a single integration I can get multiple use-cases covered.

Incentivized

• Siteimprove has helped bring our accessibility scores up from middling to near-perfect.
• Siteimprove has helped reduce our broken links, style violations and misspellings.
• Siteimprove's heatmaps have helped us make the case for enforcing best practices on the website among key stakeholders.

Incentivized

• Improved conversions and funnels
• Better user experience and NPS
• Achieving our ambitious yearly targets well before year end

Incentivized