Asset Tiger vs. UpKeep Maintenance Management
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Asset Tiger | Score5.8 out of 10 | N/A | Asset Tiger is cloud-based asset management software from MyAssetTag.com / SmartSign headquartered in Brooklyn, including fixed asset management and asset tracking capabilities. Developed by a maker of asset tags, Asset Tiger's mission is to make asset tracking efficient and cost effective. Asset Tiger is free for up to 500 assets, and free for purchasers of the company's asset tags. | $0 up to 250 assets |
UpKeep Maintenance Management | Score7 out of 10 | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | UpKeep allows users to snap a picture of a broken piece of equipment, create a work order, and schedule it for repair - all from a mobile device. UpKeep is designed for facility, property, restaurant, and manufacturing managers looking to improve communication by enabling real-time status updates for their teams. The vendor says it is a modern, intuitive, and customizable CMMS that is proven to expedite workflow processes. Capabilities include: -Add co-workers and easily assign work… | $40 per technician/per month |
| Asset Tiger | UpKeep Maintenance Management | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Asset Tiger | UpKeep Maintenance Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 19 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 19 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 19 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 16 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Implementation went as expected 18 Answers | |
| Asset Tiger | UpKeep Maintenance Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | - | 8.2 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.8 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Asset Tiger | UpKeep Maintenance Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | UpKeep Maintenance Management Screenshots |



