TrustRadius Insights
AttackFlow has proven to be a valuable tool in the DevOps cycle, addressing security vulnerabilities and aiding users in their development …
Overview
Recent Reviews
Leaving a review helps other professionals like you evaluate Automation Testing Tools
Be the first one in your network to review AttackFlow, and make your voice heard!
Get StartedPricing
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
Alternatives Pricing
What is AutomationHQ?
AutomationHQ™ (AHQ) is a complete TAAS (Test Automation As Service) solution. Its NLP driven, cloud-based No-Code test automation platform is presented as ideal for agile delivery team. Any one in agile team can develop In-Sprint test automation in plain English with AHQ. User can create virtual…
What is TestComplete?
TestComplete is a GUI test automation tool that enables users of all skill levels to test the UI of every desktop, web, and mobile application. TestComplete is best suited for testers, automation engineers, and QA teams in any industry.
Product Details
- About
- Tech Details
What is AttackFlow?
AttackFlow Features
- Supported: Hierarchical View
- Supported: Move & Copy
- Supported: Parameterized Testing
- Supported: Requirements-Based Testing
- Supported: Security Testing
- Supported: Supports Parallel Execution
AttackFlow Technical Details
| Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems | Web-Based, Windows |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews
Community Insights
TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
AttackFlow has proven to be a valuable tool in the DevOps cycle, addressing security vulnerabilities and aiding users in their development processes. Users have found that the tool seamlessly integrates into their development environment, allowing them to quickly identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in real-time. By running tests against their code, users are able to promptly address security issues and prevent potential leaks.
One of the key use cases for AttackFlow is its ability to help users effectively identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities. This is particularly beneficial in a DevOps culture where speed and efficiency are paramount. Users appreciate how AttackFlow allows them to run tests against their code and provides them with actionable results, enabling them to address any issues promptly.
Another important use case of AttackFlow is its seamless integration into the development environment. The tool is easily installed and updated, providing an effortless experience for users. Furthermore, customers have praised the responsiveness of the customer support team, as they take their job seriously and promptly respond to any problems or queries.
Overall, AttackFlow has been well-received by users, who recommend it as a good tool for security testing in the DevOps cycle. Its ability to quickly identify vulnerabilities and run tests against code has proved invaluable in helping users address security issues efficiently while keeping their development processes moving forward.
Convenient tool for security testing: Several users have found AttackFlow to be a convenient tool for security testing, particularly in the context of Continuous Integration with DevOps. Its user-friendly interfaces make it easy to navigate and perform tasks efficiently.
Effective static code analysis: Many reviewers have highly regarded AttackFlow for its effectiveness in static code analysis within the software development life cycle. It excels in inline security analysis and has a strong ability to identify potential security and vulnerability leaks.
Comprehensive assessment and solution suggestions: Users appreciate the depth of analysis provided by each scan in AttackFlow, as it offers a comprehensive assessment of potential risks. Additionally, the software provides potential solutions for the identified risks, further aiding developers in addressing vulnerabilities.
Lack of Language Support: Multiple users have expressed their dissatisfaction with the limited language support in AttackFlow. Some reviewers have specifically mentioned that the software should improve its Java support and include additional programming languages. In particular, some users felt that AttackFlow needs enhancement for JavaScript and HTML scripts.
Limited Compatibility with Docker Containers: A number of reviewers have pointed out that AttackFlow does not read inside Docker containers, which poses a limitation for companies using a micro-services architecture. This can be seen as a drawback for organizations relying on containerization technologies to secure their applications.
Unintuitive User Interface: Several users have criticized the user interface of AttackFlow, considering it the most problematic aspect of the software. Reviewers have described it as lacking intuitiveness and not being natural to navigate. This feedback suggests that there is room for improvement in terms of usability and user experience.