Quick Simple solution for Indirect Buys.
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We mainly use Coupa for the procurement of indirect materials and services. The purchases/invoices will be checked for compliance with corporate requirements (e.g., are the Correct Cost elements used, does it exceed the given budget, etc.) and then sent for approval as appropriate, based on the organization's setup and the dollar amount of the requested item.
Pros
- Visibility and control over Spendings.
- Compliance to corporate standards.
- Routing for approval.
Cons
- Handling of multiple currencies and conversion.
- Support for another language - not just display, but also data entry (e.g., Vendor name in a foreign language).
- Lots of integration work with SAP to make it work.
Likelihood to Recommend
Suitable: Simple indirect procurement. Low cost; short cycle implementation. Less Suitable: Complex procurement scenario requiring serious vendor collaboration. End-to-end integration. Direct Material Procurement, especially when planning, quality inspection, and other miscellaneous activities are involved, requires handling various special statuses and updates to meet industry- or country-specific requirements.
